Hello again, and you don´t want to spend money for the crossgrades? but i bet with you, you must, because the next logic update comes, and (for example) for a multi proc system you must have a totally new sofware programmed especially for to use with this multiprocessor system. Do you think logic will give us the next big update for free? or a LA Software for a Multiprocessorsystem also for free? Probably not!!! greetings, tobi ----- Original Message ----- From: Tobias Woelki <riva@...> To: <logic-users@onelist.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 5:09 PM Subject: [LUG] Logic on BeOS - Would be very very great!! > From: "Tobias Woelki" <riva@...> > > Hi there... > I think I have also something to say to the beos letteres in here!! > Here is my statement: > I have worked with beos 4 the last time, I used it and the SPEED and POWER > of this OS was (AUDIO+VIDEO) the fastest, I had ever seen!!!!! We tested it > on one machine (P2 300 (the fastest Proc this time) ) > We had found out, that the p2300 was runnunig 3 (!) times faster on Be as on > the windows plattform! > This is the reason why i cant wait for to get (?) logic on be.........AND I > am not in your oppinion that if you have to pay a lot of money for the > crossgrade it would be better to invest the money in a new proc. > this is because WINDOWS is (and you can ask anybody you want!) the badest OS > for our veryvery fast computers... > Let´s take an old amiga (eg a500). This was a machine runs only with 7 mhz, > but the graphics for example were running sooo much faster than the graphic > on a p100 (and this machine is about 14 times faster than the good old > a500!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) - And why ? Was the processor faster ? - No! The > only thing is: Microsoft OS vs Amiga OS!!!!! thats it... > now lets see: > i an using a p3 600 with 256 ram, 40 gb u2w hd - lap 411 and some plugins / > es1 - And what is the messge I got? > -"CPU TOO SLOW OR DISK..." (How can this be?) And of course, i am not new to > the pc (I am working as a administrator/hardware rep and so on, and i know > what i am talking about!!!!!) > here is my advance: > My system will run under beOS/Logic as FAST as a futere system with > windows(P4-1200 768MB 200MHz fsb, 80 gb u3w and so on...) and the best > thing is : i do not have to reboot my computer after all new hardware or one > of the 1000 bugs or bluescreens....) You see, it depends not on a faster > proc, its the os that makes your hardware getting so slow!! (If you don´t > believe - ask the mac user here in the list! On a definetely slower mac > computer logic runs much more faster (for example NO latency at all!) than > on our winpc..... > > And to Windows 2000 : This is really great i tesed it, and it was as slow as > if i had make a DOWNgrade to > a p2-400 > > Thats why it would be great if we could work with logic on be!! > > greetings to everyone out there using logic on win and waiting for getting > logic on be. > > P.S.: sorry for my bad english and don´t be angry about me. i am only very > angry about this fucking windows system, that runs bad as hell!! > > tobi > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mat Jarvis <mat@...> > To: .Logic@Onelist <logic-users@onelist.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 4:06 PM > Subject: [LUG] Re: Logic on BeOS > > > > From: "Mat Jarvis" <mat@...> > > > > From: Dennis Gunn <mightyjohn@...> > > >If logic could run with a given version of the BeOS and run more > > >efficiently than it does on any other OS, who would care if the BeOS was > > >*ever* ugraded again. Logic is my primary application. Not the OS. If > > >the OS were efficient I would be happy to see the OS untouched and > > >subsequent releases of logic be tailored to a specific version of the OS. > > > > >That way would not only be easier for me but the programmers as well > > >wouldn't it? > > > > Hypothesising - What if you'd said the same thing 5 years ago, that you > were > > totally happy with the Atari OS, which as it happens has stayed the same. > > You'd be stuck with old, out of date hardware and software. Can you > imagine > > what hardware and software everyone else will be running in 5 years time, > > far outstripping your old and slow media OS (if it was never updated > again). > > > > Also, BeOS is a very early, but promising OS from what I've seen. It has > > only very recently been able to handle multiple audio channels. I'm > > guessing that this won't be perfect or bug free. > > > > What are the advantages of BeOS over Win98/ 2000 or Mac OS 9/ X. I'm > > speculating > > here. Slightly better midi timing, lower latency, less potential audio > > glitches and faster scrolling (graphics). All these things have been > > greatly improved over the last few years on Mac and Windows, and will > > continue to do so. In 5 years there may not be much traditional midi > around > > anyway, having gone inside the computer via sample accurate VST2 or > Yamaha's > > mLAN Firewire. So in a year or two Logic on Mac/ Win dual processor 2GHz > > machines will far outstrip a dual processor 600MHz BeOS machine with old > > software > > and hardware. Just look at where the Atari is now. > > > > If there is no developer help Emagic may not be able to bypass certain > bugs > > unless Be fixes them first, like the multi channel audio thing. > > > > I WOULD like to see Logic on BeOS, and I hope to see BeOS 6 and 7 > (desktop) > > sometime. But if this IS the last version, then you can understand that > not > > many large software companies are going to hold up development on Mac and > > Win to write for Be. > > > > I'm largely happy with Logic on Win98 and look forward to Logic on Win2000 > > (next month?). > > Even if full development went ahead, I think it would be a few years to > get > > to the same level as Mac/ Win in regards to Sample editors, useful audio > > utilities, plugins and drivers. I don't think there is a plugin standar d > on > > Be yet. So this would mean Be or Emagic developing their own. > > > > However, I think it depends on how Emagic would handle crossgrades to > Logic > > Be before I switched. I would not spend another £4/500 UK to switch to > Be, > > as I would still need LAWP to use all my existing software/ plugins etc. > If > > I spent this money on better CPU or sound card I would get a lot more than > > simply switching to Be. > > > > Cheers > > > > Mat > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@onelist.com > > > > > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@onelist.com > >