|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
I collected all my BeOS comments in one mail...
on 01.02.2000 7:49, Softworks at softworks@... wrote:
> At this point I suspect LAB is and has always been chats and marketing
hype,
> wasn't Markus supposed to be chief developper for Be as well ?
Nice idea, but totally wrong :-)
At the beginning I was responsible for the BeOS support at Emagic, but
because I only have limited time (I also have to do many things on Mac OS
and also some new projects in the works :-) and we wanted to do _MORE_ on
BeOS we _hired_ somebody for that job...
############## ############## ############## ############## ##############
on 01.02.2000 1:57, Dennis Gunn at mightyjohn@... wrote:
> If logic could run with a given version of the BeOS and run more
> efficiently than it does on any other OS, who would care if the BeOS
was
> *ever* ugraded again.
Which also means: you can _never_ buy a new mainboard, new graphics card,
etc. in the future, because the OS has to support it...
############## ############## ############## ############## ##############
on 01.02.2000 5:30, Adrian Gill at adrian@... wrote:
> It`s not suprising developers start getting nervous.
Well, AFAIK Steinberg already pulled the plug in Nuendo for Be, and so did
several other companies! And Be didn't do anything to stop them from doing
it!
> I haven't anywhere heard them say support will end.
> Quite the reverse, in fact.
??? Nobody got an official statement from Be... But how can they make money
from a product, when they are giving it away for free? How do they pay the
guys in the support? It seems that they only focus on Stinger (AFAIK a sort
of set-top-box OS), which can mean that the internet stack in BeOS will
become better :-)
> Maybe if just a quarter of this list were to email and encourage
> Be to clear up some of the 'FUD' perhaps Emagic et al would get some
> of the reassurance they feel they need to continue.
THIS comes to the main problem: Emagic has to plan for the future and I
think, that Emagic simply can't _TRUST_ a company that didn't gave a clean
statement in the last weeks.
[BTW: I am not involved in the BeOS development at the moment and these
comments about Be and Emagic are my _private_ opinion!]
MMM
--
Markus Fritze
Emagic Soft- und Hardware GmbH <http://www.emagic.de>
Chief Developer New Technology Integration, MacOS
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |