jump to beginning show previous Showing Logic-users Thread 103831 of 105816 show next jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: timothy eilers <timothyeilers@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 at 12:51:47 AM
Subject: Buying a Mac Pro????
Message #239507
Hey Gang, I've been trying to update my system. I need to pick a new computer. Are the dual quad processors overkill? I don't want to spend more than I have to. Anything will be an improvement on my old G4. If I buy a dual 2.66, will I outgrow it too quickly? Mac Store is no help. I will also have to get a new Audio interface. Any advice is very welcome. Thank you.
Viewed 249 times, 3 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Eric" <ericdano@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 at 2:01:28 AM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Buying a Mac Pro????
Message #239509
This is a reply to #239507.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "timothy eilers" <forums@...> wrote: > > Message posted by timothy eilers <timothyeilers@...>: > > Hey Gang, > I've been trying to update my system. I need to pick a new computer. Are the > dual quad processors overkill? I don't want to spend more than I have to. > Anything will be an improvement on my old G4. If I buy a dual 2.66, will I > outgrow it too quickly? Mac Store is no help. I will also have to get a new > Audio interface. > Any advice is very welcome. Thank you. > Base model now is a 2.88 model. I just got one. It is amazing. I can run a ton of virtual instruments and I haven't gotten the processor load to 1/2 yet.
Viewed 237 times, 0 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Andy Hardwake" <andyhardwake@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 at 5:33:42 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Buying a Mac Pro????
Message #239515
This is a reply to #239507.
> Message posted by timothy eilers <timothyeilers@sbcglobal.net>: > > Hey Gang, > I've been trying to update my system. I need to pick a new computer. Are the > dual quad processors overkill? I don't want to spend more than I have to. > Anything will be an improvement on my old G4. If I buy a dual 2.66, will I > outgrow it too quickly? Mac Store is no help. I will also have to get a new > Audio interface. > Any advice is very welcome. Thank you. I switched from a dual 867 G4 to a 2.66 in December and I'm loving it. I run tens of VIs and hunderd plus plug-ins and my performance meters never go above 25%. Regarding audio interfaces, I absolutely love the sound of Apogee to the extent of not being able to work on other equipment anymore (I previously did lots of location work on RME and some other gear). Get either Duet or Ensemble depending on your I/O configuration. Best, Andy (Mac Pro quad 2.66, 10.5.2, Apogee Ensemble, Logic 8.0.1(
Viewed 211 times, 1 reply, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: "Paul" <resomania@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 at 8:47:13 AM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Buying a Mac Pro????
Message #239520
This is a reply to #239507.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "timothy eilers" <forums@...> wrote: > > Message posted by timothy eilers <timothyeilers@...>: > > Hey Gang, > I've been trying to update my system. I need to pick a new computer. Are the > dual quad processors overkill? I don't want to spend more than I have to. > Anything will be an improvement on my old G4. If I buy a dual 2.66, will I > outgrow it too quickly? Mac Store is no help. I will also have to get a new > Audio interface. > Any advice is very welcome. Thank you. > I just upgraded to from a dual 867 G4 to the base 8-core and its amazing how much more processing power I have. You should go with the base 8-core model for $2800. It doesn't make sense to get the 4-core just to save a few hundred dollars. Paul
Viewed 223 times, 0 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Andrew Hunt <andy@toolshed.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 at 9:48:36 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Buying a Mac Pro????
Message #239522
This is a reply to #239515.
On Feb 29, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Andy Hardwake wrote: >> I absolutely love the sound of Apogee to the extent of not being >> able to work on other equipment anymore (I previously did lots of >> location work on RME and some other gear). Get either Duet or >> Ensemble depending on your I/O configuration. Is the sound quality of the Duet equal to the Ensemble, but limited to 2 inputs, or is the Ensemble higher quality overall in addition to having more inputs? thanks, / dy
Viewed 230 times, 1 reply, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message.
From: Andy Hardwake <andyhardwake@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 at 11:54:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Buying a Mac Pro????
Message #239526
This is a reply to #239522.
On Feb 29, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Andrew Hunt wrote: > > Is the sound quality of the Duet equal to the Ensemble, but limited > to 2 inputs, or is the Ensemble higher quality overall in addition to > having more inputs? Dunno, never tested them side-by-side. All I can say is the Duet has the same warm (I'd call it analog warm) and smooth sound as my Ensemble. Speaking of the latter, it has a decent clock generator (tested by syncing my samplers and other digital equipment to it) and the warmth is achieved by boosting 80 - 100 Hz a dB or 2 and very very slightly (around -0.5 dB) cutting the 3 k range. Best, Andy
Viewed 748 times, 0 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.