Zeroeat@goodmedia.com wrote: >... does not compute.... >I don't understand this sentence. >The lower the buffer, the smaller the latency and the bigger >the burden on the CPU. Posted by: "PrjStd@aol.com" PrjStd@aol.com forteman1 Sun Nov 4, 2007 7:47 am (PST) > Thanks for your response.I had already read the manual. Was looking > for > others experience to verify what I read before purchasing Ivory.(In > fact i generally deal in large Orchestral pieces with many vocal > tracks > and have found the "Low Latency Mode" to be less than perfect.) Hence > the first part of the original question.Also-I know about the > relationship between buffer size and CPU hit,hence the second part of > the original question . My deepest apologies for not being clearer. I > meant to say can I use a buffer size of 256 or less to accomplish the > task?If this still doesn't compute perhaps you might want to try > turning on your own "Low Latency Mode" :-) Ivory is an exceptionally well programmed instrument with an efficient player that has a good voice-stealing algorithm. You don't have to limit the polyphony, but I leave it set at 24 notes and never notice anything. If you're happy with any V.I.s you'll be happy with Ivory. Nick Batzdorf, editor/publisher Virtual Instruments Magazine www.Virtualinstrumentsmag.com 1-877 VImagzn (846-2496) +1818/905-9101, cell 590-9101