|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
In a message dated 4/12/07 5:37:58 AM, bobdemaa@mac.com writes:
> The sound of the ensemble will make the firepod seem dark. The
> Presonus converters are very nice, very musical, but dark by
> comparison. To answer your number one question, yes, the converters
> are that much better. I'm pretty sure the ensemble costs about a
> Grand more than a firepod, the converters between the two are not
> even in the same league IMHO.
>
>
Can you say anything about your experience with latency,buffer settings,etc.
Thanks -Joel
On Apr 12, 2007, at 4:28 AM, PrjStd@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 4/12/07 5:37:58 AM, bobdemaa@mac.com writes:
>> The sound of the ensemble will make the firepod seem dark. The
>> Presonus converters are very nice, very musical, but dark by
>> comparison. To answer your number one question, yes, the converters
>> are that much better. I'm pretty sure the ensemble costs about a
>> Grand more than a firepod, the converters between the two are not
>> even in the same league IMHO.
>>
> Can you say anything about your experience with latency,buffer
> settings,etc.
> Thanks -Joel
no I really can't, but I'd expect it to be about the same as anything
else, possibly better knowing that Apogee has devoted a lot of
attention to it. I think there is a small amount of DSP in the unit
itself which handles routing, which might help keep latency lower
than you basic FW interface.
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |