jump to beginning previous thread #8819 Showing Logic-users Digest 8820 of 9800 next thread #8821 jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "The Doghouse NYC" <doghousenyc2@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 12:33:05 PM
Subject: RE: [LUG] Groove TEMPLATES QUESTIONS-how to save grooves
Message #220476
This is a reply to #220474.
> Alternatively you can just save the MIDI files the templates are based on > to > some place on your harddrive. Whenever you need them, you can simply drag > them into your arrangement and perform the groove template creation again. > > Regards > Sascha Right. It's probably also worth mentioning for the original poster that the midi files or regions must be in the song. Delete them from the arrange, you loose them which makes it somewhat cumbersome to keep a whole bunch of them in an autoload. If you do, it probably makes sense to stuff them into a folder and hide it so you aren't looking at it all the time. ___ Nathan Rosenberg Music Production The Doghouse NYC www.doghouseNYC.com -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.18/506 - Release Date: 10/30/2006
Viewed 2065 times, 0 replies, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Peter Ostry <po@ostry.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 12:50:13 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: Sample Edit - Swap LR?
Message #220477
This is a reply to #220435.
On 30.10.2006 Mathias and Mark wrote: > "Stereo Pan" Thanks, works good. The "legal" version obviously better than the "illegal" version ;-) For those who are interested in splitting a stereo track: Stereo track routed to a stereo bus. 2 stereo (!) Aux'es with inputs set to the stereo bus. A StereoPan in both Aux'es with R/L levels far down. Sends from the Aux'es to 2 mono busses. You can of course split any stereo bus with that method, that could be helpful if you want to process the two sides independently. That maneuvre would be easier if the L and R setting on an Aux would work. And it would not be necessary at all if we had L/R settings for sends. ___ Peter Ostry
Viewed 1559 times, 1 reply, 23 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: aaron <aaron@cirruscirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 1:53:33 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Core Audio error Mac Pro
Message #220478
This is a reply to #220477.
I just got my new Mac Pro 2.66 / 2 gig Ram and MOTU traveler. I'm running my new sessions at 192k / 24 bit. Currently running 25 stereo audio tracks and 5 Instruments Ultra beat, Sculpture. I keep getting A Core Audio error message that says "System Overload, the audio engine was not able to process all required data in time. I've adjusted the I / O buffer size settings and still no luck. Am I missing something? I expected to get better performance from this set up. thanks Aaron
Viewed 1561 times, 1 reply, 23 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "darealbasoski" <mail@olavbasoski.nl>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 1:20:02 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: UAD 1 Effects
Message #220479
This is a reply to #220475.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "Mathias Hagenah" <forums@...> wrote: > I´ve overtaken some studio equipment. > There´s a G4 DP 2 GHz/Mac OSX 10.3.9 with an UAD 1 Card in it. > When I open a UAD Plug In in Logic Pro 7.1 there are no Parameters, > only Presets. > I´ve seen a Screenshot (somewhere here ?) that looked the same. > > I can like the inserted Effect Presets as they appear or shut it down > and rather use another. > > My question: > Is it really supposed to be that way or do I need to Upgrade > the UAD or ??? > > I remember the were some issues with UAD when converting to Core Audio/AU. > Ist it that I´m suffering from ? You mean you see no interface? No knobs, buttons, etc? O.
Viewed 1467 times, 2 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Pete Thomas <logic@petethomas.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 2:47:47 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Sample Edit - Swap LR?
Message #220480
This is a reply to #220410.
stephband wrote: >> >>> stephband <stephband@...> wrote: >> >>> Is there really no easy way to swap the left and right >> >>> channels of an audio file (destructively, while sample >> >>> editing)? >> >> >> >> Posted by: "markdvc2002" mark@logic-users.org >> >> You could try logic's gain plugin, which allows swapping >> >> of the L and R channels, or use this helpful freeware >> >> plugin >> > >> > On 28.10.2006, at 01:08, stephband wrote: >> > Yes, I know. But I said destructively, while sample editing. >> > It still surprises me that such a simple thing is missed out >> > of the Sample Editor. Oh well. >> >> Posted by: "Peter Ostry" po@ostry.com peter_ostry >> Does it even make sense? We have the Gain plugin to swap the >> sides and the DirectionMixer to do it continuously. Where is >> the advantage of swapping in the sample editor? > > When editing samples! Say you are using the EXS Instrument > Editor, and you click on the E to edit. I often have samples I > want to play back with LR swapped compared to other samples in > the same instrument. > There's no easy way to do this. You must import them into the > Audio window, insert them on a track, instantiate the Gain > plug-in, set the locators, bounce down and save the file to good > location where you can import it back into the Instrument Zone. > Either that, or the other way is to convert them to split > stereo... blah blah, you get the gist. > > It's a laborious process if you're editing a layered, multi-zone > instrument. > > Also at times when you have recorded an MS signal but as an SM, > and you just want to standardise your MS tracks to avoid future > confusion. Or you've recorded with a couple of LR mic inputs > reversed (it does happen!) and you want to avoid confusion when > you come to mix later, perhaps importing the files elsewhere. > You want to be able to fix problems before they happen. > > It seems to me a simple, helpful tool and an obvious omission > from a Sample Editor. > Audiofinder is very good at this kind of stuff. As well as being useful for other things! Check it out. -- Pete Thomas www.petethomas.co.uk Logic Tutorials, Hints, Tips, free Icons, Environments EXS Instruments (donationware)
Viewed 1489 times, 0 replies, 23 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Paul Najar <pnajar@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 4:16:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: UAD 1 Effects
Message #220481
This is a reply to #220479.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "Mathias Hagenah" <forums@...> wrote: > I´ve overtaken some studio equipment. > There´s a G4 DP 2 GHz/Mac OSX 10.3.9 with an UAD 1 Card in it. > When I open a UAD Plug In in Logic Pro 7.1 there are no Parameters, > only Presets. > I´ve seen a Screenshot (somewhere here ?) that looked the same. > > I can like the inserted Effect Presets as they appear or shut it down > and rather use another. > > My question: > Is it really supposed to be that way or do I need to Upgrade > the UAD or ??? > > I remember the were some issues with UAD when converting to Core > Audio/AU. > Ist it that I´m suffering from ? Do you have the latest UAD Software? 4.4 I think. You should - but first check for Panther compatibility. We've been in Tiger for a while now... Also I have a vague memory that plugin display uses Quicktime so maybe it's a system problem. Maybe run Apple Software Update as well... Regards ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Paul Najar Jaminajar Music Production www.jaminajar.com
Viewed 1447 times, 1 reply, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: malik lovely <aama02@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 2:05:57 PM
Subject: Re: [LAW] Logic for PC Question
Message #220482
I am still using an older version of Logic Audio (for PC). I have one question: How do I sample from a CD I put in my CD Rom Drive? What do I select to sample directly from my CD Drive? Is it in the Options menu or is it under Audio? Thanks!
Viewed 1453 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Mathias Hagenah <niteblind@niteblind.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 3:35:41 PM
Subject: Re: UAD 1 Effects
Message #220483
This is a reply to #220479.
>You mean you see no interface? No knobs, buttons, etc? O. Yes. But I can hear the Effect.
Viewed 1470 times, 1 reply, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Anders Enkvist <enkvist@home.se>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 4:16:53 PM
Subject: [LUG] PM causes crash while scanning the firewire disk
Message #220484
Hi all! I¹ve been trying to update my Projekt Managers path references, due to migrating from my old (un)trusty G4 Quicksilver ,but it crashes all the time. It seems to happen when the scanning reaches the firewire drive. Anyone who has had the same problem? I¹m on an iMac Intel Core Duo 2.0 and Logic Pro 7.2.3. I have disabled all AU-plugins to see if any of them caused the problem. Regards Anders Enkvist, Stockholm
Viewed 1338 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Dandi Wayne <dandi.wayne@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 4:58:15 PM
Subject: Re: [LAW] Platinum upgrade
Message #220485
This is a reply to #220466.
Mark Cahill <mark@logic-users.org> wrote: > Actually, it doesn't stand to reason. AFAIK, updating directly from logic 5 > to logic pro 7 will NOT allow you to use those instruments in Logic 5 Which > became part of logic pro. As Danilo mentioned in his mail, he had already > added Logic 6 which did give you this windows authorisation. Sorry, I meant to say I just want to activate those that already exist in Logic 5--those of EXS24, EVoc, ES1, and ES2. I agree....I wouldn't expect instruments that were newly released with Logic 6 and Logic 7 to be available in Logic 5. Thanks again....
Viewed 1547 times, 1 reply, 16 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Mark Cahill <mark@logic-users.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 5:13:30 PM
Subject: Re: [LAW] Platinum upgrade
Message #220486
This is a reply to #220485.
Dandi Wayne <dandi.wayne@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I meant to say I just want to activate those >that already exist in Logic 5--those of EXS24, EVoc, >ES1, and ES2. I agree....I wouldn't expect instruments >that were newly released with Logic 6 and Logic 7 to >be available in Logic 5. Thanks again.... Those are the ones I was referring to. Just to spell it out - A user of LAW was able to buy Logic Pro 6, get it autohorised on his XSkey, and use these plugins in LAWP 5.5.1: ES1, ES2, Evoc, EVP 88, EVB 3, EXS 24, EVD 6 Obviously, the plugins that came after Logic 5.x, notably Space Designer in Logic 6, and Sculpture and Ultrabeat in Logic Pro 7, would not work with 5 anyway. What I am saying is, if you have Logic 5 Windows and buy the Logic pro 7 upgrade, it will NOT give you authorisations of the Logic 5 instruments I listed. Logic Pro 6 did this, Logic Pro 7 does not. Hope that is clear kind regards Mark Cahill
Viewed 1584 times, 2 replies, 16 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Mathias Hagenah <niteblind@niteblind.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 5:21:15 PM
Subject: Re: UAD 1 Effects
Message #220487
This is a reply to #220481.
> Do you have the latest UAD Software? 4.4 I think. You should - > but first check for Panther compatibility. We've been in Tiger > for a while now... Also I have a vague memory that plugin > display uses Quicktime so maybe it's a system problem. Maybe > run Apple Software Update as well... I just registered and downloaded it. I guess that´s it. I´ll see on monday when I´m back there. I don´t believe it´s a Quicktime thing. Thanks a lot Matzy
Viewed 1464 times, 0 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Mathias Hagenah <niteblind@niteblind.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 5:33:05 PM
Subject: Re: [LAW] Platinum upgrade
Message #220488
This is a reply to #220486.
There was a radical change in the programming of the Key from Version 5 to 6 (blue key) and some additions to Logic 7 (for Spacedesigner, Sculpture, Ultrabeat and Guitaramp a.s.o.) which weren´t available before, if I remember right. regards
Viewed 1570 times, 0 replies, 16 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "darealbasoski" <mail@olavbasoski.nl>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 5:28:57 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: UAD 1 Effects
Message #220489
This is a reply to #220483.
> Message posted by Mathias Hagenah <niteblind@...>: > >You mean you see no interface? No knobs, buttons, etc? O. "Mathias Hagenah" <forums@...> wrote: > Yes. > But I can hear the Effect. OK. No, it's not supposed to work that way. You should see a UAD icon in the dock, which opens the UAD driver. This should tell you which UAD software is on your G4. Make sure you download the latest from www.uaudio.com. In Tiger UAD plugins should work perfectly normal, maybe you have a real old version there. Also, a good source of UAD related info is http://www.chrismilne.com/uadforums/index.php O.
Viewed 1448 times, 0 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "pancenter" <hwooten@dakotacom.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 5:02:22 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Core Audio error Mac Pro
Message #220490
This is a reply to #220478.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, aaron wrote: > >I just got my new Mac Pro 2.66 / 2 gig Ram and MOTU traveler. >I'm running my new sessions at 192k / 24 bit. >Currently running 25 stereo audio tracks and 5 Instruments Ultra >beat, Sculpture. >I keep getting A Core Audio error message that says >"System Overload, the audio engine was not able to process all >required data in time. >I've adjusted the I / O buffer size settings and still no luck. >Am I missing something? I expected to get better performance from >this set up. I would say that's damn good performance considering you're running at 192/24. Data I/O at 192 is huge... either the system bus will saturate or the drives cannot keep up. Are you using a separate high speed audio only drive? One question.... why 192, it makes absolutely no sense, your audio interface qualiry is far below the threshhold of any possible gain 192kHz could provide. Manufacturers use the 192kHz as mostly a marketing device. To benifit from 192kHz your hardware and recording environment would need to be pristine, and even then....... Howard
Viewed 1550 times, 1 reply, 23 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "pancenter" <hwooten@dakotacom.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 5:27:32 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: [LAW] Increased RAM creates problem with logic 5.5.1
Message #220491
This is a reply to #220461.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Posadka" wrote: > >Hi Howard, >Thank you very much for your reply. Normally, I don't fool around >with my computer and therefore I am not exactly sure how to apply >your recommendations safely. Please if you can give me more detailed >info I will appreciate it. No problem, see below. >I looked into my Windows files but couldn't find the System.ini text >file. Is it in the Windows? Please lead me to where it is and how to >do it. It's in the Windows directory: Do this first. Go to "control panel" and then open "Folder Options". Under the "View" tab scroll down a short way and uncheck "Hide extensions for known file types". If it's already unchecked move on to the next part. This will lett you see the .ini part of the file. Next open Notepad. Navigate to the Windows directory on your system drive (C:) tell notepad to show ALL files, not just text documents. Find system.ini and open it, paste the lines below to the end and save it. [VCACHE] MinFileCache920 MaxFileCache920 Reboot. What is the symbol between the word cache and the number 920? In your answer it shows as thick black line. A mistake somewhere, either in my paste or Yahoo's font interpretation. >Regarding the Min/Max Virtual memory I don't know where to change it >either. >My ComputerProperties/Advanced/Performance/Settings/Advanced/Virtual >Memory/Change, I don't see Minimum/Maximum, only Maximum. Is this >the place where to change it? Yes, select custom setting: Under initial size select 512 Under Maximum size...also 512 Note: This still may not help your problem as Logic is old, and only understands 1Gig of RAM. If nothing else the above will help your computer run more efficiently for most things. Howard p.s. the drastic fix is to modify the bootini file so that the computer only recognizes the first gig of RAM at startup. You can set it so a menu is presented at startup, you can then select a 1Gig or 2gig boot option. That was on the site link I posted.
Viewed 2684 times, 2 replies, 7 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: MusicGearfanatic@aol.com
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 5:57:21 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Core Audio error Mac Pro
Message #220492
> I just got my new Mac Pro 2.66 / 2 gig Ram and MOTU traveler. > I'm running my new sessions at 192k / 24 bit. Currently running > 25 stereo audio tracks and 5 Instruments Ultra beat, Sculpture. > I keep getting A Core Audio error message that says "System > Overload, That's the strangest thing. I have nearly the same set-up you do (the only difference is 5gigs of RAM and 2 2408 MOTUS with a 425pcie). I'm running 45 tracks of Audio and so far like 20 Absynth 4's and lots of Space designers and 4 instances of Stylus and other goodies and I've never really even come close to putting much of a dent in the performance meter. -Jason
Viewed 1505 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "Sascha Franck" <S.Franck@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 6:43:28 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAW] Logic for PC Question
Message #220493
This is a reply to #220482.
malik lovely wrote: > I am still using an older version of Logic Audio (for PC). > I have one question: How do I sample from a CD I put in my CD Rom Drive? > What do I select to sample directly from my CD Drive? Is it in the Options > menu or is it under Audio? Thanks! The best idea would be to get one of the various CD to audio file extraction tools, then save the files onto your harddisk and import them into Logic. Exact Audio Copy does a pretty decent job: http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/ Regards Sascha
Viewed 1546 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Jeremy Belzer <jeremybelzer@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 6:03:19 PM
Subject: I bought a DIGI 002 Factory (faders, interface, etc.)
Message #220494
I found a great deal on this and bought it, and though I've heard rumors of people with pops and clicks, I haven't had any. BUT - I'm not sure if anyone is succesfully integrating the 002 with Logic. I have been looking for places to research how to assign faders, etc. But with no luck. I'm a novice of control surfaces, but I thought it would - with time, increase my workflow. If you have any places to point me for information, or any advice like - sell that and buy "____" it can be integrated better with Logic. THANKS! Also: Is there an interface that everyone uses that is tried and true and I could find easy information on? THANKS AGAIN.
Viewed 1801 times, 2 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "John Pitcairn" <johnp@opuslocus.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 7:45:17 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: I bought a DIGI 002 Factory (faders, interface, etc.)
Message #220495
This is a reply to #220494.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "Jeremy Belzer" <forums@...> wrote: > I have been looking for places to research how to assign > faders, etc. But with no luck. The Digi 002 control surface section works with ProTools only. John Pitcairn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - LC Xmu Logic/Mackie Control emulation & management, LC Xview software LC/MC display, Logic environments & stuff... Opus Locus - http://www.opuslocus.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
Viewed 1788 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Ray Burghardt <rhardt@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 6:05:59 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Panning Effect
Message #220496
There's a free AU call Round Pan by MDA at http://www.mda-vst.com/
Viewed 1335 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: aaron <aaron@cirruscirrus.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 6:37:24 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: Core Audio error Mac Pro
Message #220497
This is a reply to #220490.
: >> >> I just got my new Mac Pro 2.66 / 2 gig Ram and MOTU traveler. >> I'm running my new sessions at 192k / 24 bit. >> Currently running 25 stereo audio tracks and 5 Instruments Ultra >> beat, Sculpture. >> I keep getting A Core Audio error message that says >> "System Overload, the audio engine was not able to process all >> required data in time. >> I've adjusted the I / O buffer size settings and still no luck. >> Am I missing something? I expected to get better performance from >> this set up. > > I would say that's damn good performance considering you're > running at 192/24. Data I/O at 192 is huge... either the system > bus will saturate or the drives cannot keep up. Are you using a > separate high speed audio only drive? > > One question.... why 192, it makes absolutely no sense, your > audio interface qualiry is far below the threshhold of any > possible gain 192kHz could provide. Manufacturers use the 192kHz > as mostly a marketing device. To benifit from 192kHz your hardware > and recording environment would need to be pristine, and even > then....... > > Howard > I'm using 2 320 gig Barracuda perpendicular drives striped RAID. I have been running Logic the OS and the projects off of this set up. I just tried running Logic and my OS off the internal and opening projects from the RAID drives. Still no difference. I can hear a difference in quality now that I'm in 24 bit. I must admit I'm not sure what I'm gaining from the 192k. Is it advantageous to step down to 96k or just stick with 44.1 / 24 bit. Also as I am still new to Logic, how can I convert my audio files at 192k down to another sample rate? thanks for your feed back. Aaron
Viewed 1571 times, 2 replies, 23 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "pancenter" <hwooten@dakotacom.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 7:10:46 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Core Audio error Mac Pro
Message #220498
This is a reply to #220492.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, MusicGearfanatic@... wrote: > > > I just got my new Mac Pro 2.66 / 2 gig Ram and MOTU traveler. > > I'm running my new sessions at 192k / 24 bit. Currently running > > 25 stereo audio tracks and 5 Instruments Ultra beat, Sculpture. > > I keep getting A Core Audio error message that says "System > > Overload, > > That's the strangest thing. I have nearly the same set-up you do > (the only difference is 5gigs of RAM and 2 2408 MOTUS with a > 425pcie). I'm running 45 tracks of Audio and so far like 20 Absynth > 4's and lots of Space designers and 4 instances of Stylus and other > goodies and I've never really even come close to putting much of a > dent in the performance meter. Jason... you're running at 192kHz/24 bit? If so... wow! now that's impressive. What's your sample buffer set at? HW
Viewed 1508 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@goodmedia.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 8:32:41 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] I bought a DIGI 002 Factory (faders, interface, etc.)
Message #220499
This is a reply to #220494.
Jeremy Belzer <jeremybelzer@hotmail.com> writes: > I'm not sure if anyone is succesfully integrating the 002 with Logic. The control surface part of it is only compatible with ProTools software. The audio interface part of it is compatible using Digi's CoreAudio driver. However, I have never encountered a worse CoreAudio driver. And the sound quality of the unit stinks compared to anything by MOTU, RME, Presonus, and some others. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>
Viewed 1800 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Alex Dzamtovski <adzamtovski@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 at 11:04:01 PM
Subject: logic and reason
Message #220500
I just bought logic pro, a new Mac Intel Pro and have version 7.2.3 and also acquired reason I am trying use rewire to intergrate the two which should be simple but is not working . I currently have Reason 3.0 . Intially I should be started up logic and then when I boot up reason on my reason hardware interface i should be seeng rewire slave but i am not . I am just seeing the the name of my fireface 800 . Does anybody know what I am doing wrong? Thanks
Viewed 1490 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
jump to beginning previous thread #8819 Showing Logic-users Digest 8820 of 9800 next thread #8821 jump to end

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.