--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Per Boysen <per@b...> wrote: > BTW, last week I saw a post recommending to use the RMX midi learn > function to map those faders to the RMX parts, but this doesn't work > since RMX does not recognize the midi sent by those faders. Any ideas? The Audio Inst channelstrip hijacks CC7 and CC10 (on any channel) for volume/pan before it gets to the plugin, so RMX never sees CC7/10. If the plugin can learn any CC# for its internal channels' volume/pan, use a transformer after the Multi Inst to convert CC7/10 to different CCs, and learn those. John Pitcairn ----------------------------------------------------------------- LC Xview software LC display, LC Xmu Logic Control emulation, Logic environments & stuff: http://www.opuslocus.com -----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm guessing you probably mean "Toolshed Percussion" a 2 disc cd-rom on Big fish audio. Played by Pat campbell ( percussionist for tom waits amongst others) Anyway, I have it & it's pretty usable, mainly due to the rex file content, and Very Tom Waits!!! Check it on www. bigfishaudio.com Cheers, Gav.....

> --- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Per Boysen <per@b...> wrote: >> BTW, last week I saw a post recommending to use the RMX midi learn >> function to map those faders to the RMX parts, but this doesn't work >> since RMX does not recognize the midi sent by those faders. Any ideas? On Jan 31, 2005, at 12:57, John Pitcairn wrote: > The Audio Inst channelstrip hijacks CC7 and CC10 (on any channel) for > volume/pan before it gets to the plugin, so RMX never sees CC7/10. > > If the plugin can learn any CC# for its internal channels' volume/pan, > use a transformer after the Multi Inst to convert CC7/10 to different > CCs, and learn those. Hey, that was a mighty powerful tip!!! Thanks a lot! Good to know about that hijacking. Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen --- http://www.looproom.com (international) http://www.boysen.se (Swedish site) http://www.cdbaby.com/perboysen

Hi there, Isn't this a leftover from so many years past??? If the region (MIDI) doesn't start on the downbeat then the region quantizing does whatever the hell it wants... sheesh... I'm sorry I didn't include that in the bug report since I forgot about it until I had to clean up some MIDI done by someone else. Any hints? Cheers Hans Sytem: Logic 7.0.1 Logic 6.4.3 17" PB 1Ghz / 1 GB RAM OS X 10.3.7) MetricHalo MobileIO 2882 Unitor8

>> Set a marker at the start of the song. Open the marker list. >> Doubleclick the length (righthand column) for that marker and set it >> to the length of the song. Other markers will be unaffected. >> >> Now, whenever you want to bounce, just cycle and go to the first >> marker. >> >> The only possible problem with this is that the maximum marker length >> is 999 bars, maximum song length is 2138 bars. >> >> John Pitcairn >> > Aha! Will try that asap! Thank you so much John!! > > Well, unfortunately, can't seem to get this to work. What units should I be typing in for length of song? I tried the number that indicates the position of my last, end position marker, but it won't "take" for the first marker, if that makes any sense. I tried deleting my first marker then, still no go, but this begs the question: does my first marker then become my second marker? On second thought, no need to trouble you with all of this; thanks for trying to enlighten me, but I'll just have to figure out something simple on my own that suits my working methods, or go back to just using only two markers, which worked perfectly, and was very fast, easy, and intuitive. So un-Logic. Seriously, many thanks anyway, I truly appreciate your kind effort, Peace, Ed Billeaud Snowflake Studio

> Set a marker at the start of the song. Open the marker list. > Doubleclick the length (righthand column) for that marker and set it > to the length of the song. Other markers will be unaffected. > > Now, whenever you want to bounce, just cycle and go to the first > marker. > > The only possible problem with this is that the maximum marker length > is 999 bars, maximum song length is 2138 bars. > > John Pitcairn > Aha! Will try that asap! Thank you so much John!! Peace, Ed Billeaud Snowflake Studio

>William Aleman said: > >>Well... I have news for you: >>The old Motu 1296 converters sound much, much better than the 12/192. Irwin wrote: > >Take a look at this paper: > >http://www.lavryengineering.com/documents/Sampling_Theory.pdf > >Fascinating look from one of the best converter guys out there as to why in >his opinion 192k is not as good. Hats off to Mr. Dan Lavry. I know Mr. Dan Lavry from the Webbd Mastering forum where his theories have been discussed several times. I was a follower of his theory until he came up with his new AD/DA converters at 96KHz, breaking his defense of the Nyquist Sampling Theory that he supports in this article. If 88.2 and 96KHz were overkill as he stated early, then what was the purpose for him designing such converters. That was my first impression when I saw the converters advertised in ProAudio magazine for the first time. His defense is to shift the Fz content of the error signal (aliases) to highest frequencies than Nyquist Sampling Theory. A very valid point. But what I see is an increment in two opposite directions in the music business: over sampling for DVD-A, Super Audio, CD, and Surround Sound and in one direction, MP3, AAC and other formats in the opposite direction. The Ipod is breaking sale's records as the new player. The industry is fighting, pushing, struggling for their new highest resolution players, DVD-A, Super Audio and Surround Sound with not such good results in selling their high end media players. All of these lead us to one thing: the digital hype era. The only thing is that sometimes we don't realize that we are participating in one way or another. Lets participate with some grade of consciousness, educating ourselves, getting very well informed before we purchase any new equipment. I have a friend (who is a technician in digital audio equipments) who told me once: In the middle of this revolution of digital audio don't invest in any transitional expensive device. Keep what you have and wait some years until the industry defines the new standard format for the end consumer. Well, I'm still recording at 44.1 and 48 KHz 24-bit mixing with an analog console. What is the purpose of having 96KHz or 192KHz as a feature in a native system when we are not able to run 24 or 32 tracks at once in the first place? Getting ready for the future. Well, guess what, it looks like the future in digital doesn't yet have its definition. -- Willian Aleman Yonkers, N.Y. USA

>> Hi all, >> Just wondering if anyone has tried the Qclone demo from Waves. >> If so, do you think its capabilities could be recreated using Space >> designer? It seems as though the new Waves plug is doing some sort of >> convolution process. >> Regards, >> Matt > It would only be static, bit I've heard of people doing this kind of > thing. > You can likely find info snip > George HI George, I am guessing that the Waves concept is static, but with a recall list of different settings? _____________________________________________________ MATT MCKENZIE-SMITH MUSIC • AUDIO DESIGN • PRODUCTION PO Box 10395, Adelaide 5000, South Australia. Ph.+61 416 197 883 goodaudiosense.com.au mattrixx.net _____________________________________________________

Hans Hafner wrote: > If the region (MIDI) doesn't start on the downbeat then the region > quantizing does whatever the hell it wants... The quantize works relative to the region´s offset (its relative position). You COULD call that a feature... Peter --- http://www.merlinsound.de

On 31.01.2005, at 00:01, Nick Batzdorf wrote: > Let's say I've recorded a note and rode cc11 to give it a shape. With > INMNE turned on in the Matrix editor, I'd expect the cc11 events that > happen within the note's duration to move along if I slide the note > to a new time position. But I don't see that happening, in v.6.4 or > 7.01. > > Does this function do something different that I'm missing? I find my CC11's always in hyperdraw of the score. Maybe that doesn‘t get moved along in the matrix editor? At least in the score CC's and notes are not linked. Peter Ostry

Hi all. Was working on logic last night on my powerbook g4 (logic 6.3.1 os9.2.2) when it froze.I did a full reset/restart and logic works fine, however the open recent menu is not remebering any songs in its list, there is just open recent in the menu and an arrow,but no list.If i open a new song with the open option, its doesnt log the last opened song in the open recent menu.strange! Any ideas? cheers,dg.

>> Does anyone know of a hardware panner controller that would work with >> Logic for surround mixing? >> Some sort of joystick thing I would think. >> I have a Logic Control but it doesn't have this capability. >> Also does anyone know of a way to get more than one surround pan >> window open? >> thanks Joystick yes, but you need one with a mid zero position. I checked a horizontal move: one controller goes continuousely 126-0-126 from left to right. The other one is 96 in the left half and 32 in the right half. If I send just one Fader #26 (or was it 23?) with values from 0-127 I get a full circle. I didn't figure out the relations of the two messages right now but I am pretty sure it can be done with a couple of transformers and i.e. with the joystick of the microKONTROL which is configurable for mid zero. I do not use surround but if anybody wants I can try to set it up this evening. >> Also does anyone know of a way to get more than one surround pan >> window Don't know, I also get just one. Peter Ostry

> > Does anyone have a sure-fire way of timestamping files out of Logic for > > import into Pro Tools? > > > Bounce as WAVE files. They are now broadcast wave files, with timestamp. > > LOVE IT! > > George i had problems with sd2 files recorded in logic 6.4. usually they should be timestamped, but protools wouldn't see that... any ideas what has to be done to make that work? (anything in logic?) gilles

On Jan 31, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Hans Hafner wrote: > Hi there, > > Isn't this a leftover from so many years past??? > > If the region (MIDI) doesn't start on the downbeat then the region > quantizing does whatever the hell it wants... Not bug. Feature. It does something very specific. > sheesh... I'm sorry I didn't include that in the bug report since I > forgot about it until I had to clean up some MIDI done by someone > else. > > Any hints? Quantize is calculated from the left edge of the region rather than to the global grid. The idea is that under some circumstances such as for example those cases where you have a patch with a slow attack it will be convenient to quantize to something other than the global grid. The behavior is well documented, just look in the manual and the description is right there at the beginning of the section on quantizing. Is this good? While I consider it to be a great option personally I disagree with this implementation because people are confused by it. IMO the default should be to quantize to the global grid but

--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "jazzdoctor73" <goldman_dan@h...> wrote: > > > Hi all. Was working on logic last night on my powerbook g4 (logic 6.3.1 os9.2.2) > when it froze.I did a full reset/restart and logic works fine, however the open recent > menu is not remebering any songs in its list, there is just open recent in the menu > and an arrow,but no list.If i open a new song with the open option, its doesnt log the > last opened song in the open recent menu.strange! OS X users have had much experience with the Open Recent menu being unpopulated, and the fix in OS X is to trash the Preferences. (although it's usually wise to move the old ones out of the System folder and import Key Commands to the newly created ones first) Maybe it works the same in OS 9..? Sonny Keyes SKa Music Toronto www.skamusic.ca

>>>Set a marker at the start of the song. Open the marker list. >>>Doubleclick the length (righthand column) for that marker and set it >>>to the length of the song. Other markers will be unaffected. >>> >>>Now, whenever you want to bounce, just cycle and go to the first >>>marker. >>> >>>The only possible problem with this is that the maximum marker length >>>is 999 bars, maximum song length is 2138 bars. >>> >>>John Pitcairn >>> >> >>Aha! Will try that asap! Thank you so much John!! >> >> > > Well, unfortunately, can't seem to get this to work. > What units should I be typing in for length of song? > I tried the number that indicates the position of my last, > end position marker, but it won't "take" for the first > marker, if that makes any sense. I tried deleting my first > marker then, still no go, but this begs the question: > does my first marker then become my second marker? > I'm still a little confused about whyyou need a marker to mark the end of the song. As John said you can set a marker at bar 1 to stretch right to the end, so the RH limit of this marker is the end of your song. I would make sure it has a bar or two to cover reverbtails. My way of setting a cycle if I need one for bouncing would be to drag this marker into the top half of the bar ruler, eg grab it just after bar 1. This actions the cycle. Excuse me if I'm talking about something different. (NB if it's a short song and I have no marker covering the whole song I just sweep the pointer from bar one to the end of the song) -- Pete Thomas www.petethomas.co.uk - Free Logic Icons, Environments and EXS Instruments

> > FWIW: I use a TrippLite LC1800 Line Conditioner on an isolated 15 amp > > circuit. It is excellent for both computer equipment and music/MIDI > > equipment. I had humming and background noise and since installing the > > LC1800, this is pretty much history. I take my chances and do not use a > > UPS, although I've enjoyed pretty reliable power over the years where I am. > > > > Thanks for that info Stephen! I remember that the > inimitable George Leger III also recommended this > unit. Does anyone know how these compare to the rack > mount ones offered by Monster? > Thanks, JP I have a Tripp-Lite UPS which I like fine. I can't compare it to the Monster unit from experience, but are you familiar with this issue:..? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-users/message/181435 Sonny Keyes SKa Music Toronto www.skamusic.ca

--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "Sonny Keyes" <sonnykeyes@s...> wrote: > > I have a Tripp-Lite UPS which I like fine. I can't compare it to the Monster > unit from experience, but are you familiar with this issue:..? > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-users/message/181435 I just realized this is an expired link. The story is at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/11/08 / BUG1J9N3C61.DTL&type=business In brief, Monster Cable is suing anyone with the word 'monster' in their product name, irrespective of whether it relates to pro audio. They've certainly earned my lack of respect. Sonny Keyes SKa Music Toronto www.skamusic.ca

George Leger III <george3@...> wrote: >> Does anyone have a sure-fire way of timestamping files out of Logic >> for >> import into Pro Tools? >> > > Bounce as WAVE files. They are now broadcast wave files, with > timestamp. > > LOVE IT! > I think the problem is in SRC. If I import the files into a 44.1 song they have the correct TC. It's then possible to change the SR of the song to 48K and the regions stay put. But if I try to import them into a 48K song, the TC is really screwed up. So I don't know if this is a Logic problem, or a problem with the files, and I don';t have time to figure this out now as I have to finish the score! I agree that BWave is very nice, but the mixer insists on SD2 files... I think that format conversion will probably louse up the TC too. Aargh! Standards! - where would we be if there weren't so many to choose from? _ with best wishes, John http://abram.ca/

Does anyone know how to import an mp3 or other audio file into Logic, then split that stereo file into two separate audio tracks? I've tried "edit/disconnect selected split stereo file" from the audio window, but an alert stating "Please select exactly the split stereo audio file you want to disconnect" appears. I've tried selecting the entire file, or either of the stereo channels, but to no avail. Thanks. -Tom

>> I'm pretty sure they do an Audio Unit version now. > > 'emm, wouldn't that be nice! Unfortunately it's been "coming soon" for > about a year! Maybe in 2006 hey? They were beta testing an AU version in December. I have to think that either the testing didn't go well or that it's coming pretty soon. Since a lot of you seem to have both AT4 and Logic 7, can anyone render an opinion on using the Logic PC plug vs. AT4 in automatic mode? If you were running L6.x and had enough money for only the upgrade to 7 or to buy AT4, which would you do? Thanks, Gregory

--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "u b i k" <i_love_ubik@y...> wrote: > > > > If your converters don't sound "great" at 96k, get a set that > does. Well... that's why i'm here (duh) and as far as i know, the MOTU hardware is the only solution at this point (aside from Pro Tools) that offers 24 channel recording.. (clearly, i could be wrong) Any suggestions. Which 'moderately priced' converters are you talking about, that sound very bid and analog??? Husky

I recently updated my Pluggo plugs. Old songs wont open, and Logic crashes... Any help on how to import the track ? Have tried re-installing the old pluggo plugs, in all forms and combinations... It seems that it might have someting to deo with the factory presets ?? Any tips ? thanks

the surgex brand are supposed to be the best - warranty for ten years - the armed services use these and the have to be set to strict specifications. http://www.surgex.com/ hope this helps -michael

At 13:58 Uhr +0100 31.01.2005, Peter Duemmler wrote: >Hans Hafner wrote: >> If the region (MIDI) doesn't start on the downbeat then the region >> quantizing does whatever the hell it wants... > >The quantize works relative to the region´s offset (its relative position). >You COULD call that a feature... :-) :D >:-o I guess... Hans