On 30.09.2004, at 23:13, logic-users@yahoogroups.com wrote: > You could also use the behringer BCR2000 for this > Currently not, because the BCR2000 does not have a C4 emulation mode, in contrast to the BCF2000 which does have a Logic Control emulation, among others. Beste Gruesse - best regards, Michael Haydn - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Michael Haydn mhaydn@... Logic Developer http://www.emagic.de/ SoundDiver Group Executive Emagic Soft- & Hardware GmbH - Germany Phone: +49 4101 495 0 Halstenbeker Weg 96, 25462 Rellingen Fax : +49 4101 495 199 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On Sep 30, 2004, at 2:36 PM, Michael Haydn wrote: > > > On 30.09.2004, at 23:13, logic-users@yahoogroups.com wrote: > >> You could also use the behringer BCR2000 for this >> > > Currently not, because the BCR2000 does not have a C4 emulation mode, > in contrast to the BCF2000 which does have a Logic Control emulation, > among others. I'd suspect that they soon would. When we see this C4 come to market, I'd guess well see an emulation mode within the month... George ________________________________________________________ www.utopiaparkwaymusic.com Now both Mac OSX and Windows XP... the only way to fly ;-) Some cool Logic tips: http://www.courseptr.com/cooltips/

"sdx77sdx" <jejune77@...> writes: >How do I find the xKey serial number? OSX: Logic menu -> XSKey or OSX: Apple menu -> System Preferences -> XS Key (at the bottom) OS9: Apple menu (when Logic is open and topped) -> XSKey f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Andy Hardwake <digitalmechanics@m...> wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > > THis is really old, I do not think it ever was released. I also > > doubt if it will ever see the light of day. > > As Michael said there simply was no app to support it. Now when > Logic 7 has full support it may be finally out in a few days/weeks > from L7 official release. Hmmm, my pragmatic side says that it will not happend. Since Mackie UC is supported by many platforms now, I doubt they will release it just because Logic 7 now supports it. I would love to see the unit, but I think it is not going to get released at this point. But I would love to be proven wrong. Cheers, :: chuck hasek :: dj saint :: boulder / denver co :: www. mercury26.com

It really seems like they have ramped up the specs on this version of logic. Dual G4 or G5 recommended *cringe*. I'll be curious to see how this runs on my 1.3 PB.. :( *crosses his fingers*. Anyone out there know of how efficient it is (with freeze tracks and all)

At 06:54 AM 9/30/2004, you wrote: >Its like having a dashboard in a car which has 2 clocks with no needles or >no numbers >to tell u how fast u are going. But if u get this after market thing an >place over top of it >that shows only the numbers parameter name, u wont know if its RPM of MPH, >Oil temp >or water temp. I don't know about you, but I use the martix window because it is an informational display/editor. I can look at it and know the notes being played, when they are played, how long they are held, what velocity they are, and with hyperdraw view, all the details such as volume, etc. Gripe about a feature Cubase has sure, but that analogy is a no go. It's more like seeing everything out the window but wanting a text display telling you what you are seeing (when you can just look). Hey, I'm not against what you are asking, but you can't expect such a high priority on something that is only useful to a small amount of people. I kind of agree with Sascha in that it would be kind of annoying, but that's just me. Personally I thin linking an event list with the matrix editor would be much better than what you describe. Again, that's just me and my only point is that the martix is hardly rendered useless by not having this feature. Now the ability to name notes is another story, that would greatly help in editing drum tracks. Colin Miller PS - Thanks Micheal for all the info

> From: "darealbasoski" <mail@...> > Multiple audio interface support is AFAIK not a Logic thing, but a Coreaudio > thing, and supposedly Tiger is to address that 1st quarter 2005. Brilliant News! I knew it was a core audio restriction but hadn't heard about tiger, thanks. > My Logic on OSX takes about 10 seconds to boot. Anyone want snappyness? Get > a snappy computer. (I'd suggest a G5). > Well I do have a G4 1.25 dp, not too sloppy, but if I'm not going to need dual boot anymore maybe an early xmas present to myself! Cheers Sean

From: "lmilker" <Lukas@...> > Hi folks, i know it's a bit off topic, but perhaps any of you know what are > apple's plans for > emagic hardware (Unitor, AMT etc.)? Will the development be continued or are > they gonna > get dropped? Not official, but this was posted a while back: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/logic-users/message/161617 Danny

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:41:46 -0000, David Egbert <degbert@...> wrote: > Does anyone know if there's an upgrade path from the Big Box to > Express 7? The upgrade info says: "Upgrade requires Logic Express 6 > installed." Does the Big Box qualify too? I've been told that Upgrade B, which was the path from BigBox/Express to Pro will also be available for Logic 7. I sure hope that's the case... Mark S. (Email me offlist for a free gmail account - the best way to read LUG.)

--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Michael Haydn <mhaydn@e...> wrote: > > On 30.09.2004, at 05:18, logic-users@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > > Does Logic 7 support long filenames? As in longer than 31 characters? > > Partially. The long names aren't shown, but the short representation is > now resolved correctly to an existing long name file. > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, > Michael Haydn Thanks Michael, are there plans to display the long filenames in the near future?

> Hmmm, my pragmatic side says that it will not happend. Since Mackie > UC is supported by many platforms now, I doubt they will release it > just because Logic 7 now supports it. I would love to see the unit, > but I think it is not going to get released at this point. But I > would love to be proven wrong. > > Cheers, > > :: chuck hasek How cool would it be to just select your audiotrack and have the Channel EQ ready to go on the C4, doing away with the need to go click click click click on a main MCU. O.

Michael Haydn <mhaydn@e...> wrote: > First of all, I'm a developer and not involved in marketing, so I can > only give you my private opinion. > Logic Pro 7 is the biggest upgrade we ever had and worth every single > penny. > Even if you have upgraded to Pro 6 yesterday. There are so many new > features and enhancements. > Buying external plug-ins which might have only an approximate feature > set would sum up to at least $1000. > So why should you be jealous of someone who hasn't upgraded to Pro 6? > > Beste Gruesse - best regards, > Michael Haydn I totally agree with Michael and those who say that this upgrade really worths. I remember the Emagic presentation in January at NAMM, I was wondering "Wow, how does it costs all this?" Now, all this software is bundled with: new architecture upgrades, others 10 new plugIns, including Lin-Phase EQ (do you remember the price of the Wave's one?), Apple Loops library, and, if you're not completely satisfy, they give you Waveburner, for the first time for OSX. How many time and human resource you think all this needs to be in your hands for only $299??? I just upgraded to Pro 6 last week, and I'm not sleeping waiting for the Italian release of Pro 7. Ciao, Danilo

At 2:13 PM -0700 9/30/04, George Leger III wrote: >You could also use the behringer BCR2000 for this Yeah, maybe if my memory was better. Remembering the mapping on the Behringer units would make them difficult to use, I would think. The use of electronic "scribble strips" on the Mackie Control stuff is really terrific. The Behringer stuff is sure cheap, though, and I love that it has USB. It's peculiar that a port for a complicated protocol like USB is way cheaper than for a simple protocol like MIDI. -C -- | In theory, there is no difference between http://www.xfade.com/ | theory and practice. In practice, there is. cbm@... | - Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

> Fortunately, I inadvertently saved all that playing in > the form of freeze files. Unfortunately, my default > setting for those freeze files was 32 bits, and I > can't seem to find a way to get Logic to re-import or > convert those 32 bit files. Soundhack can do this (and a million other things as well), and it's free. Go to versiontracker.com and seek it out. u b i k

Michael Tuminello <mt@...> writes: >does anyone know what's involved with this sharing? do you need a >Logic license for every machine? if you have an older machine without >GB ethernet, is it possible to put any ethernet card in it and use it >for this? You only need to buy Logic once. The node software can be installed on unlimited Macs. Gigabit (1000Mb/s) ethernet is supported. Use 100Mb/s at your own risk, but it has been known to work. It's not necessary to use Apple's ethernet connection (3rd party cards ought to work, which is a good idea if you don't have Gigabit.... just buy a card). f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

"Andreas Helmle" <ahelmle@...> writes: > Even the logic pro7 upgrade not longer working with OS 9? Logic Pro and Express 7 is for OSX 10.32 and higher only. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

Gareth Henderson <gareth@...> writes: >Can any of the beta testers give any "real" feedback on how useable a G4 >is as a node? It's not supported. Use at your own risk. It works, but don't complain when it doesn't. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

"smallfry2au" <smallfry@...> writes: >Would it be possible to use a new G5 iMac as a node and a 2nd monitor. Node: Yes. 2nd monitor: No. The monitor of the node Mac shows the node Mac's desktop. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

> crap... sorry, that's not what I meant. I meant a way to bounce > files with plug-ins in the arrange window and not having to re- > import them... something that does it automatically. Do you need something beyond what Freezing the track provides? Brian :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Logic Audio Pro 6.4.2 PowerMac G4 933MHz OS X 10.3.4 1 GB RAM MOTU 828mkII - driver v1.09 - CueMix v1.4

> Several "Pro Tools killers" have been available for years. :) Pro Tools is dead... long live Pro Tools! u b i k

> Do you need something beyond what Freezing the track provides? I do: the ability to cut 'n slice the bounced file and manipulate it graphically as an audio region. Currently, on audio tracks, I have to unfreeze, edit, refreeze (600 hundred times!). And with AI's the regions are midi, but at some point in production I need to work with and edit waveforms. Plus, with Audio Instruments like Spectrasonics, which take >30 seconds each to load up when opening a song, a 'bounce in place' would let me remove the Instrument from the song, greatly reducing load times on most of my songs (which can take up to 5 minutes to open). There're other reasons too, but for me those 2 alone are worth implementing the feature. u b i k

>> DP colors the notes by track, whereas Logic colors by velocity. > In the Matrix window? Just select Sequence Colors under the local View menu. You, sir, have just made my days even better. Thank you. u b i k

When I click on this button, do the approriate buses and auxes involved also solo? So that I hear the verb on the snare, or the snare thru the drum bus? Yes? Please? u b i k

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:44:00 -0000, c_bernard_nielsen <cbernard@...> wrote: > So, this leads to my 1st question... are the new iMacs looking > promising as far as the ability to handle a medium-sized software > studio? I usually run about 6-7 softsynths/samplers, some effects, > etc. I would like to have Reason and Reaktor running along with it, > which i cannot to right now with my dual-500 G4. I have about $2000 > to spend and the iMac looks appealing in that sense, as i need new > monitors etc. my curved-screen old dell monitors just arent being > nice to my eyes anymore. Here's a link that might shed some insight into how the new iMacs perform against other machines in the Apple line: <http://www.macintouch.com/imacg5/benchmarks.html>; Mark S. (Want a gmail account for LUG reading? Email me offlist.)

> > > Well I do have a G4 1.25 dp, not too sloppy, but if I'm not going to need > dual boot anymore maybe an early xmas present to myself! > Trust me; apart from my first sampler in '86, our G5's were the best things we bought for the studio ever! O.