1. Have you tries uninstalling the AWE64 Gold and seeing if that helps. 2. Do you have a modem attached to your PC? If so, disable it and try that. 3. Any network cards? If so, disable it and try that. Note. if you have a modem you will at least have TCP/IP networking installed. 4. Check the IRQ settings and see which of the PCI cards is sharing with which. My guess is that the crash and reinstall has caused a different IRQ grouping and this is the source of the problem. Strange that only LAWP seems to be affected. Another thought ? Did you install Direct X before LAWP or did you use the version on the LAWP CD ? I believe it is hard to go backward with Direct X but as I understand it, LAWP is fussy about which version of the Direct X Runtime Media is installed. Hope some of this helps, Ray

Hi Mark, You may find the RAM a bit on the low side but if your system is well set up and you don't run a lot of plug-ins then you could get there. The choice of sound card will also affect the equation. Why don't you give us all the details on your system if you want a more comprehensive answer. Ray

I'm just getting into using Logic VS with my 1680, and I'll be slaving an O1V for premixing. Since there had been earlier discussion of lots of sys ex not chasing properly, it would seem controllers would work better, since their data can be thinned. Am I missing something in Logic for a density setting or "Thin" function re: controller data? I've been pouring over the owner's manual, but if it's there, I can't find it. I'd hate to have to do it manually, event by event. Help! Please! ...z -- --=-- GeneralMIDI; 128 voices without egos...---=--- L.G. "Zeek" Duff WHAT!Productions! Blue Wall Studio 303.485.9438 ICQ#35974686

>I would be very interested to >hear from anyone who has used a 688 with an MMC-100 with Logic or without. >Thanks >Evan Sorry I can't answer you question but I am really intrigued as to why in the world you would want to go on using a Tascam 688 if you have LAMP. Not to slam the 688 in any way I used to have one too (made some mixes that went on albums with it). I have no idea what you are doing with yours. But if you are reworking old songs that you recorded on it why dont you just transfer the tracks into logic and do it there? It is a pretty easy matter to realign the MIDI with the audio manually. Dennis Gunn Mightyjohn@... check out MIGHTY JOHN HENRY's album "hot air head" info at http://www.twics.com/~mightyjo/home.html

>Markus PLEASE continue your development for BE. There are SO many people I >know are hanging out for it. It would be such a good move for Emagic. Me too. Each Mac OS seems more bloated and sluggish than the last I would really like to run logic on something simple sleek and fast. Dennis Gunn Mightyjohn@... check out MIGHTY JOHN HENRY's album "hot air head" info at http://www.twics.com/~mightyjo/home.html

Hi Sandy; just a thought: do you disable everything thats running in the background, like your graph card control and all that ? second: your AW card: did you set the input selector to analog ( audio>hardware & drivers > ) The digital input might cause problems if selected, even when no digital source is connected. Did you try disabling one of the midi interfaces ? Hope you'll sort it out Budy (with a lot of family in your country :-)

Hi beyerdynamic DT 770, but you don't want it on your head for a couple of hours. Ciao Budy ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: Kickin' Da Speaker <whatislife@...> Aan: LUG <logic-users@onelist.com> Verzonden: zondag 30 januari 2000 12:12 Onderwerp: [LUG] OT: headphone choice? > From: "Kickin' Da Speaker" <whatislife@...> > > Hi, anyone out there mixing with headphones? What do you use? I was thinking > of getting myself a pair of AKG K240DF, but I'm curious to see what you guys > like? > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@onelist.com > >

Thanks ! Budy ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: SBS T. Bleicher <SBS.TBleicher@...> Aan: <logic-users@onelist.com> Verzonden: zondag 30 januari 2000 15:22 Onderwerp: [LUG] OT: Muon now compatible with Logic Audio > From: SBS.TBleicher@... (SBS T. Bleicher) > > Hi all, > > according to Muon software, the Atom VST instrument is now compatible with > Logic Audio. Free download from: > > http://www.muon-software.com/html/products.html > > All the best > Thomas > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@onelist.com > >

Has anyone on this list tried Siblelius (Mac version)? How does it compare to Logic? Joan

Personally, I prefer the reply at the top, so you don't have to scroll down. Maybe it's different in digest mode? -Markus > From: zerobeat@... (f-erenc szabo) > > Now if only everybody would agree to compose their messages > from top to bottom instead of bottom to top, it would all be > *very* readable. I'm talking about putting your response after > the thing you're responding too, not before. > > f-erenc > "Fix signs"

On 31 Jan 2000 01:00:30 -0000, you wrote: > Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:10:09 +0900 > From: Dennis Gunn <mightyjohn@...> >Subject: Re: Logic on BeOS > >>Markus PLEASE continue your development for BE. There are SO many people I >>know are hanging out for it. It would be such a good move for Emagic. > >Me too. Each Mac OS seems more bloated and sluggish than the last I would >really like to run logic on something simple sleek and fast. For what its worth, i too would like to put my vote in for this operating system. BeOS 5 is suppose to support multiple channels of audio and i don't see why some companies should stop developement. There is a interview with a Be official on www.lebuzz.com and he says that BeOS is essentially the developement environment for Stinger and other products Be is working on. It doesn't seem like BeOS is going to dissapear just because Be is trying to find a market to make some money. There seems to be a huge demand for an alternative to windows and i find it strange that so many are willing to drop this egg so quickly. Give it chance please ! ben duke

Sorry about that ridiculous quoting of the entire digest, I just started using Outlook Express, my old email program didnt quote everything when you hit reply. Lou Gimenez -- Lou Gimenez The Music Lab "a fun place to record" 2" 24 Track w all goodies www.musiclabnyc.com

I'm using Senheiser HD 600, there are beautiful, really flat. Also they are not a closed headphone, so the sound is much more open & transparent & lots less stressful on the ears. gregorie on 30/1/00 3:12 am, Kickin' Da Speaker at whatislife@... wrote: > From: "Kickin' Da Speaker" <whatislife@...> > > Hi, anyone out there mixing with headphones? What do you use? I was thinking > of getting myself a pair of AKG K240DF, but I'm curious to see what you guys > like? > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@onelist.com > >

Thanks Murray. That's the one I was looking for. J.H. >>The new list is this one: >>pulsar-scope@egroups.com

Hi there, This is my first post to the list. I am extensive LAMP user. Setup is Mac Blue G3, One Unitor 8 MkII,One Unitor MkI, Plenty of Synths, LAMP with Pro Tools hardware with TDM. I am unable to get SMPTE output from the Unitors. Am I overlooking something or wonder whether Logic can ever put out SMPTE from the Unitor's SMPTE output jack. I need LTC out to sync a Sonic Solutions or for that matter any other DAW. I also do not prefer running Logic as a slave as the timing suffers. I have been successful with a MTP AV with its timebase switched to MTC. The MTP AV puts out LTC but the output appears 3~5 seconds after my Logic sequence is started. This is an awful lot of time to lock up an external machine to LTC. I need my interface to put out present timecode ( Time @ Song position line) so that I can lock an external machine to it. Necessarily LTC. Any solutions??? H Sridhar hsridhar@... P.S. I am from India and work for one of India's leading Music Producer.

I want give all those struggling with crashes while using USB/OMS interfaces this information. If you have a USB/OMS midi interface and any currently shipping version of the MacOS this applies to YOU. (Emagic interfaces maybe immune to this??, but it couldn't hurt either.) I was having crashes literally EVERY 30-45 minutes. I was just about ready to take my MidiSport 2x2 into the street and smash it with a sledge hammer. Then I updated my USB support files to the latest developer release 1.4f. The effect was so profound I almost couldn't believe it. I now experience very few crashes. I've only had one crash since I'm probably up to about 20 hours of LAMG use without a crash......... for me this is manna from heaven. Get it here...... http://developer.apple.com/hardware/usb/download_prerelease.html You will need to use ResEdit. and follow the intructions in the readme as the "USBsupport" driver will not function "as is". A minor modifaction needs to be made. (see the readme!!!!!!) It would be a smart idea to make a "safe copy" of this file before you attempt the modification. Get ResEdit here..... http://asu.info.apple.com/swupdates.nsf/artnum/n10964 You will need to be careful. Don't trash the original files, just move them out of your system folder in case you screw up with ResEdit. I know this has be said on the list before. I feel that this is so important that I am re-posting this to the list. I suspect that MacOS 9.1 will contain USB 1.4 so this will not be necessary for long. but i think that USB support is ROM based so there will have to be some sort of ROM update. i really hope some of you have the same results I did. peace

Myself and other Lugers have been complaining about the native support for the sonorus Studi/o card. Does anybody on the list or from Emagic knows is this problem is being dealt with. Thanks Eran

Hi Lou, Please be more careful when posting to the LUG. Cut out parts that aren't relevant to your reply before posting!!! Your message was a one-line sentence followed by an entire LUG of 20 pages, 1154 paragraphs, 5867 words, 29821 characters...verrry annoying. Ben H > LUG 682 Message: 2 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:58:05 +0000 > From: "Lou Gimenez" <musiclab@...> > Any one have a JV1010 multi instrument? thanks > Lou Gimenez [snip 20 pages, 1154 paragraphs, 5867 words, 29821 characters]

hi ; I've been watching and owning the Beos for the last 2 years. frankly: It's a great os but without the application i want : LOGIC ! I think the move to Free Beos is a smart move .(look how microsoft (c) roles now with internet explorer which was a bad joke of how a browser should look like , but they gave it free , where as netscape ,which ruled the market ,charged money). I don't use beos, althought i own the 4.5 version .why ? I hate switching Windows-->Beos >Windows. And I have to use windows ,bulky as it is , for logic. I don't want the Macos (which is monopolised ,worse then microsoft (but with colors....)),Althought being force to ,and i will if when macosX comes out emagic will still say :" No to Beos " version. markus: I think that if you'll run a quary thought this mailing list you'll find out that at least 20% will move to Beos. and after logic for Beos will Come i think 60% of the musicians will move to beos. why ? you probably saw what Beos is capable of ,and it's free now - you can bondle it with logic.. just think of the comparsion : Beos +logic Vs Cubase +windows 2000. TRY and find the musician who will buy the second option ..keep searching ,in the end you might find it .(maybe one of steinberg developers might ,because he's busy watching everything moving slowing and buggy). i tried not to say things which i know have been said. anyway . Be Logic. :-). ----- Original Message ----- From: Markus Fritze <mfritze@...> To: <logic-users@onelist.com> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 12:48 Subject: Re: [LUG] Logic on BeOS > From: Markus Fritze <mfritze@...> > > on 29.01.2000 21:28 Uhr, Ian Stewart Cairns at ian_stewart.cairns@... > wrote: > > > It would appear that Emagic may be continuing development of Logic for the > > "Dead Cow" BeOS after all. > > Don't take second source information as official! Only on www.emagic.de we > make official announcements. I don't know whom these guy asked, but > definitely not anybody here in Germany! > > > MMM > -- > Markus Fritze > Emagic Soft- und Hardware GmbH <http://www.emagic.de>; > Chief Developer New Technology Integration, MacOS > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@onelist.com > >

Hello, I just installed the ES1 (VERY NICE!!!!!!) & therefor also installed LAP version 4.1.1. The problem now is in the graphics: When I boot Logic & open plug-ins they only look as controls in stead of the editor-look .....(In version 3.5. I could choose between those 2 options) Put in in another way: Gone are the beautiful graphics! The ES1 also looks as a plug in in stead of that beautiful green synth. Now when I boot Logic from the ES-1 demo song the problem is fixed..... Does anyone else have this problem? Some say I should get the latest Direct X...but why was version 3.5. okay then? Bye! Paul Lindeboom fur@... http://home.planet.nl/~fur

Jan 30th, 2:46pm (Mississauga, Canada) I have 2 pairs of them & 1 pair of 240's as well. The DF's are very good, very musical. I can use them for pre-mixing as levels inside appear to be as accurate as my studio monitors. They are comfy, light & can be worn for long periods without fatiigue. Here in Canada they cost about $170, good value. regards, David Norris-Elye * to all Luggers.....this is my new email address From: "Kickin' Da Speaker" <whatislife@...> Subject: OT: headphone choice? Hi, anyone out there mixing with headphones? What do you use? I was thinking of getting myself a pair of AKG K240DF, but I'm curious to see what you guys like?

Okay...I've tried unplugging the dongle, and leaving it off for about 2 hours, then (with mycomputer shut off) plugging it back in and rebooting... logic still doesn't see it i dont use my mouse on that serial port its set up as com1 (3f8, irq4), but the other port is set as com2 (2f8, irq3), so if i do have it plugged into the wrong one, the other port should be detected windows can see my serial ports fine key finder doesn't do any good, it cant see it either ive had this problem since i first installed, but it seemed that if i tried it and then waited, then after a while it would work (had to get "warmed up" i guess, but now it doesn't seem to work at all... could it be a faulty key? thanks FAB

I am a three year logic user and am considering going from my power computing system to a G4 400 (AGP). Also, I am a commerical studio currently using 2" reel, but trying to upgrade to provide reliable(read minmal crashes) 24 bit hard disk tracking, mixing and editing to my arsenal I am considering the DIGI 001 or the MOTU 1224. With that in mind here are my other questions: 1. Again, I have older mac(ADB) with LA Plat 4.1.2 and an MTP A/V(connected at modem(ADB) and I would like to use my Power computing 15" monitor with the G4. What would I need by way of ADB to USB adaptors(how many for the dongle at it is female on both sides right?) 2. Would you recommend Griffin's imate? 3. The G4 will come with 128MB of RAM, how much would you suggest to handle 24 channels of eq, reverb, etc) I know as much as you can afford, BUT there has to be an amount that has been found that going above that would add a diminishing return on a cost/performance ratio. What is that amount of RAM? 4. Which hard drive, Cheetah or barcuuda or another less expensive one that will do as well (ultra wide or U2W?) Since logic only requires a tranfer rate of <3 or 10MB/s(I forget which) would either of these drive be straight up overkill?! 5. Which SCSI card, Adaptec 2940U2W or an Atto EPCI-DC or other less expensive that will do as good a job? 6. OS9 or get back to 8.6(I heard 9 has some problems) Any other assistance you can provide to make sure that I do this right would be GREATLY appreciated! Thanks, Duron Brown *** Free voicemail and email, by phone or Web! Free phone calls too! Get it today at http://www.myTalk.com ***

Hey thanks Ben, Bo, and Ray for the computer requirements for Logic Gold,, when I get the audiowerk 8 set up, I will post on my progress.. Mark ---- >From: benkri@... (Ben Duke) > >On 30 Jan 2000 16:48:18 -0000, you wrote: > >>Subject: logic gold newbie question: is this computer enough? >> >> Hi, >>I was wondering if an AMD 350 with 64megs ram and >>a EIDE IBM 5400 spin hd would be adequate [...] >>Mark > >Mark, you will get 8 tracks with no problem. I use a k6-2 350 [...] >Ben > >Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@onelist.com > >

Dennis Gunn wrote > > Sorry I can't answer you question but I am really intrigued as to why in > the world you would want to go on using a Tascam 688 if you have LAMP. Not > to slam the 688 in any way I used to have one too (made some mixes that > went on albums with it). I have been using the 688 for years (since atari Notator). I often record live drums at home or take it to a studio as a portable unit. The analogue tape is definitely more forgiving to my very unrefined (read spastic) recording technique. I use logic for most of my recording, but still find applications where the 688 is a better or more convenient option. I'll also admit that the digital/analogue hybrid studio appeals to me. I've never had a "tape too slow" error or a "try to save song" dialog from the 688. Most of the time Logic works fantastically for me, and I wouldn't be without it, but it is still capable of making me look like an idiot when I have to tell the guitar player who is half way through the greatest solo he's ever played that he has to start again because logic say's the disc is too slow. Up till now I have synchronised Logic to the 688 using SMPTE/MTC. I cut the audio files up using the scissor tool and it stays in pretty good sync. I hope that the MMC-100 will make it so that I can leave the scissor tool alone. How does MMC work? If I am sending MMC should I see Midi activity on the l.e.d's of the studio 5 the way it shows up MTC? Can I select the midi port that it is sent to? Do I have any idea at all? Evan