----- Original Message ----- From: "Evan Harmon" <d_a_b_o_m_b@...> > I'm guessing that the dongle always needs to be in one of the 2 usb ports on > my tipb g4, but could I run the mt4 from a usb hub? I'd like to get a cheap > roland usb audio device for digital out to my ad/da. > Can anyone recommend a good usb hub? > -Evan Hi again, Try to use an USB with AC Adaptator or a small on with a Laptop, but again "better try before buy !" Igor

OK, I've got a weird one. Sometimes, I will go to the track mixer and one or more of the first audio tracks will be gone from view. They are still there in the arrange window, they are still there in the audio layer of the environment, and they still function properly. However, I can't access them in the track mixer. Doesn't matter which version of Logic, as this happened in 4.5 and 4.6, and now in 4.7. I must be doing something wrong. Anybody seen this problem or have a suggestion? Also, the bug that existed in 4.6 (Platinum) where the bus send levels are not visible in the track mixer is still present in 4.7. Workaround, as with my other problem, is to use the audio layer of the environment, where the levels do appear. Irwin G4/400, 310MB RAM Sonorus StudI/O x2

Ha, had the exactly same problem half a year ago. (g4 400, 4.7.2(now), OS 9= .1) I still don´t know what it exactly the problem was, but take a look at all = these ATI-extensions inside your system-folder.(I suppose they are a part of this problem) Turn them off, turn them on and see.... by the way: Even emagicßs hotline couldn´t help me with tha..:( good luck. I know this isvery annoying... > > anyone w/ this prob? only happens when changing to a 2 > > window screenset most often to adaptiv mix + arr. > > what happens is the 2nd window gets partially drawn when > > system freezes. > > 4.7.2 > > os 9.1 g3/466 > > Jack > This sounds like a Video card problem... > Try to change the resolution to Thousand colors for few minutes to see if= > it's better... > Igor

> Hey Gang, > > You know what would be great ( I ask rhetorically, in preparation of > answering my own question)? If the EXS instrument editor had link mode > functionality. So that if you had an instrument editor open at the same > time as the regular EXS plugin window; when you called up new > instruments in the plugin window, the instrument editor window would > then update and show the newly currently selected instrument. > -- > Eli Krantzberg Yes, that would be great! per

Hi, I had this problem and got rid of it by creating a new song document and moving all parts to that one. Probably the original song doc was corrupted in some way. Other people on the list have also reported this error. All the best per boysen -------------------------------------------- BOYSEN MUSIK MEDIA INTERNET Url: http://www.boysen.se Mail: per@... Phone: int + 46 (08) 34 11 81 -------------------------------------------- > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: irwin.shur@... [mailto:irwin.shur@...] > Skickat: den 30 juni 2001 19:06 > Till: logic-users@yahoogroups.com > Ämne: [LUG] Re: [LAM] Channel(s) disappearing from track mixer > > > > OK, I've got a weird one. Sometimes, I will go to the track mixer and one > or more of the first audio tracks will be gone from view. They are still > there in the arrange window, they are still there in the audio > layer of the > environment, and they still function properly. However, I can't access > them in the track mixer. Doesn't matter which version of Logic, as this > happened in 4.5 and 4.6, and now in 4.7. I must be doing something wrong. > Anybody seen this problem or have a suggestion? > > Also, the bug that existed in 4.6 (Platinum) where the bus send levels are > not visible in the track mixer is still present in 4.7. Workaround, as > with my other problem, is to use the audio layer of the environment, where > the levels do appear. > > Irwin > > G4/400, 310MB RAM > Sonorus StudI/O x2 > > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > >>>>> Subject lines must contain: [LAM]/[LAW]/[GEN]/[OT] <<<<< > > FAQ: http://members.ozemail.com.au/~oscwilde/ > FAQ: http://www.logicuser.net > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >

Hi! I would like to automate the tempo-parameter of a delay plugin (Ohmboyz by www.ohmforce.com). Problem is it alway syncing itself to Logic's tempo (like it's supposed to do). Is there a way to disable this behaviour, other than going back to LOGIC 4.6.3 ? Thanks Marc

----- Original Message ----- From: <marc.verhoeven@...> To: <logic-users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:22 PM Subject: [LUG] [GEN] disable syncing of VST-plugs to tempo? > Hi! > I would like to automate the tempo-parameter of a delay plugin > (Ohmboyz by www.ohmforce.com). > Problem is it alway syncing itself to Logic's tempo (like it's > supposed to do). Is there a way to disable this behaviour, other > than going back to LOGIC 4.6.3 ? > Thanks Marc ?? better ask OHMFORCE... Maybe ,try to disable "Midi MTC Transmit" Igor

--- In logic-users@y..., "yael" <yael@n...> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <marc.verhoeven@q...> > To: <logic-users@y...> > Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 7:22 PM > Subject: [LUG] [GEN] disable syncing of VST-plugs to tempo? > > > > Hi! > > I would like to automate the tempo-parameter of a delay plugin > > (Ohmboyz by www.ohmforce.com). > > Problem is it alway syncing itself to Logic's tempo (like it's > > supposed to do). Is there a way to disable this behaviour, other > > than going back to LOGIC 4.6.3 ? > > Thanks Marc > > ?? better ask OHMFORCE... > Maybe ,try to disable "Midi MTC Transmit" > Igor Thanks for the idea; Unfortunaly it didn't work. I asked Ohmforce; but it's not only theirs, also Logic's Tape Delay is always syncing nicely along ;-( Marc

Dear Logic Users, Is there any way to get more than 1 UNDO level on LAPW ? This is quite dissapointing considering all the superb funtions from the logic series. hope to hear your replies, JUMA NegativeS SeheN negative@...

One of our producers has an affinity to the Sonic Foundry direct X EQ It causes huge problems when he uses it with Logic. Are there any tweaks that can make it run easier on the CPU or in some cases at all? Is this a general Direct X issue that might be fixed in V 5.0? I am running Direct X v 7.0

Marcus Barczak wrote: > it sounds VERY similar to the new system Microsoft is planning on using with > Windows XP. Basically the installer generates a unique 'key' that is based > on various serial numbers and things it extracts from your hardware > components (CPU serial #, hdd serial # etc ...) it then performs some > function that generates a unique challenge that is keyed to your computer. > > You then send your unique key to the vendor, where they generate a response > for your machine. What a convenient way for Microsoft to run a survey of all the components on your machine :) > You use this to authorise the software and away you go. > Basically the idea is your actual computer is the dongle, using the serial > numbers etc of the actual components "theoretically" guarentees that every > machine is unique. Of course one serial number from one piece of hardware would be just as unique.....but then again, Bill wouldn't be able to keep tabs on you as well. Take care Jesse widener

>From: "Sascha Franck" <saschafranck@...> >Subject: [GEN] ReadMes, was: Logic record to wav audio (LAW) >I have ReadMes for all updates in my program folder (as RTF files), even >for the latest version. >Maybe it's different on Macs? not here; the updaters update the readme file, as well --- very handy --- so that *all* the fixes/additions are present within one document. bleep, splattercell

Hi all... I'm brand new to the group. Does anyone out there have an environment setup for the Roland MC-307 Groovebox? I have searched the net and can't find one. Any help is appreciated! Rob Corbett www.djcorbett.com www.oval-records.com

Has anyone tried using a USB to Serial port adapter to hang the dongle? It should make the dongle itself feel at home, but would the keyfinder think to look there? I'd like to be able to run from my laptop without using the docking station. Thanks, Sean Garvin EoS

> Is there any way to get more than 1 UNDO level on LAPW ? > This is quite dissapointing considering all the superb funtions > from the logic series. No, right now there's only 1 undo level. The workaround right now is to have Logic make a backup every time you save (see preferences). I don't think that will change in the near future. Bye, Joeri -- Joeri Vankeirsbilck joeri@... Belway Productions - http://www.belway.com List-admin Logic-users/SoundD*ver-users/Logic-TDM

on 30.06.2001 19:38 Uhr, Enemy of Silence at enemyofsilence@... wrote: > Has anyone tried using a USB to Serial port adapter to hang the > dongle? It should make the dongle itself feel at home, but would the > keyfinder think to look there? AFAIK it won't work, sorry. MMM -- Markus Fritze Emagic Soft- und Hardware GmbH <http://www.emagic.de>; Chief Developer New Technology Integration, Mac OS

Guys this is way OT, Why don¹t you move there, anyway this serial # system is going to generate more headaches to legit users, one article reviewer said the first thing he did was to head to the net and download a crack for this, Now tell me those Emagic cracks are working in tune for ya...... > Marcus Barczak wrote: >> it sounds VERY similar to the new system Microsoft is planning on using with >> Windows XP. Basically the installer generates a unique 'key' that is based >> on various serial numbers and things it extracts from your hardware >> components (CPU serial #, hdd serial # etc ...) it then performs some >> function that generates a unique challenge that is keyed to your computer. >> >> You then send your unique key to the vendor, where they generate a response >> for your machine. > > What a convenient way for Microsoft to run a survey of all the componentson > your machine :) > >> You use this to authorise the software and away you go. >> Basically the idea is your actual computer is the dongle, using the serial >> numbers etc of the actual components "theoretically" guarentees that every >> machine is unique. > > Of course one serial number from one piece of hardware would be just as > unique.....but then again, Bill wouldn't be able to keep tabs on you as well.

on 30.06.2001 17:11 Uhr, jfjr1@... at jfjr1@... wrote: > After > Reason was released I believe Mr.Fritze said that a fix to support > Reason would be a 4.xx subrelease and full rewire 2.0 would come in > 5.0 > Earlier this week I read a comment where Mr.Fritze said Reason support > would come with 5.0. I think you quoted my mail correctly. I have to admit, that I mixed up Reason and Rewire 2 support in my last mail. I don't know the current state of the Reason support in Logic. It might be in a 4.x release or it might be in 5.x - I don't know. > I apologize if I missquoted Mr.Fritze,but I do feel it would be > unfair to make Reason support a paid upgrade. Well, all statements here are without any warranty. Sometimes we have to change priorities, because other even more important things show up. Some people have other priorities than we and so they may think: Why? This features is SOOO important. Well, I might not for us and thousands of our users and sometimes we can't even tell you the reason, because the higher priority features are top secret till they ship. I am really sorry when this happens, but I can't avoid it. MMM -- Markus Fritze Emagic Soft- und Hardware GmbH <http://www.emagic.de>; Chief Developer New Technology Integration, Mac OS

Every time I open a particular song I get a "Can't Initialize Audiowerk" message then my machine crashes (G4/466/256meg). This seems to be a problem with the song itself. Is there a way to force the song to open (key command maybe) using the Mac AV configuration so I can rescue the elements of the song? If not is there a way to disable the Audiowerk to achieve the same result? Please help me save this little masterpiece. Thanks in advance.

Whenever I try and bounce to an Audio track, I arm the channel, hit record, and it sounds like the song is going through a delay unit and keeps feeding back over itself. Anyone have any suggestions as to what is going on? I have a feeling it has something to do with my recording setup in y soundcard. I am using an SBLive. Thanks. Mike

I am sure this has probably already been discussed but does anyone know if it is possible to automate knobs within a VSTi such as the Pro52? I have read the manual but it doesn't seem to mention anything besides general mixer automation, and effects automation. I tried to automate the VSTi as I would an effects plugin but to no avail. Any suggestions? Mike

> if it is possible to automate knobs within a VSTi such as the Pro52?...Any > suggestions? It is possible to automate knobs of a VSTi... but the Pro52 is a special case. Afaik, the Pro52 doesn't automate well in Logic. to automate it, put it in "control" view instead of the grafical editor. Cable your VSTi channels to a channel splitter just like you did for audio channels. Then select such a channel splitter in the arrangement and record the movements on it. I think this should work. Bye, Joeri -- Joeri Vankeirsbilck joeri@... Belway Productions - http://www.belway.com List-admin Logic-users/SoundD*ver-users/Logic-TDM

Thanks, I'll give it a try. I am fairly new to Logic so its gonna take me some time, but I'll post how it goes to the list. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joeri Vankeirsbilck [mailto:joeri@...] Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 4:20 PM To: logic-users@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAW] VSTi Automation > if it is possible to automate knobs within a VSTi such as the Pro52?...Any > suggestions? It is possible to automate knobs of a VSTi... but the Pro52 is a special case. Afaik, the Pro52 doesn't automate well in Logic. to automate it, put it in "control" view instead of the grafical editor. Cable your VSTi channels to a channel splitter just like you did for audio channels. Then select such a channel splitter in the arrangement and record the movements on it. I think this should work. Bye, Joeri

Hi, ive posted twice about Logic's whimsical decision to convert source files or to just show everything as invalid objects, and nobody seems to know the answer. Is this something Emagic is fixing for version 5? Am I the only one to see it behave so erratically in this fashion, or are there certain characteristics about the LSO that make Logic be able to convert the objects in it? any help would be appreciated, I am really really stuck here. Ian

Hi, can I automate only certain MIDI data to a particular AudioInst? I'm pretty sure this is easily accomplished I just cant seem to figure out how to do it from the manual. thanks. Ian