show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 49222 of 246002 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 at 3:41:40 AM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Re:Re: Re: LAMP Conflict catcher
Message #49222
This is a reply to #49103.
Thoughts from the mind of Lachlan Deck, 31-12-2000: > > No offense, but this sounds somewhat silly to me. There's a huge >> difference between resident virus- and crash-protection software >> (which stays active at all times) and an extension manager that >> performs its job at startup time and then becomes inactive. I really >> can't see how CC could be incompatible with e.g. Logic. The innocent > > desktop clock is more active than CC, as far as I can tell... > >No offense taken. Happy to be corrected. If this is the case then I posted >in ignorance as my understanding was that CC was active throughout the use >of the computer to - 'Catch Conflicts'. > >As you are saying that this is not the case then I can't see any problem >with it. Uhm... I am _thinking_ that CC is inactive after startup (hence the "as far as aI can tell" at the end of my msg). A subtle difference... :-) I might be wrong and would like to be corrected then. I myself am not too fond of software that stays resident and active all the time. happy new year, HJ -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra ( h@... )
Viewed 1455 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.