show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 40650 of 246002 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Jesse Merlin <zip@...>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 at 7:02:36 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] LAM/LAW - PPC & P3 "raw" perf. - let's make a test!
Message #40650
This is a reply to #40618.
oh you guys use more than 2 tracks, i only use 2, "cleared samples" and "uncleared samples" :P Mark Edwards wrote: > on 10/1/00 2:56 AM, Martin Saleteg at martin@... wrote: > > > I heard something about "Mac G4 not in favor in this test". > > > > Can we increase the testing to include something the Mac G4 does well? Does > > anyone have an idea of how to set up such a test in a simple way? > > I made the comment about the test being biased. The problem with including > Altivec in the test is that it is very difficult to do so without > controlling which hard drive is being used. In other words, once you start > adding lots of tracks to bring the G4's Altivec into the test, the test will > also be heavily affected by the speed of the hard drive among other things. > > I think the test as it stands is a great idea. We just need to take note > that it isn't reflecting the Altivec enhancements that will increase > performance in real-world use (lots of tracks, rather than just two). > > -- > Mark Edwards > San Francisco, CA > MarkEdwards@... > > Unsubscribe: mail to logic-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > >>>>> Subject lines MUST contain: LAM/LAW/GEN/OT <<<<<
Viewed 350 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.