show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 241295 of 246215 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "Sascha Franck" <S.Franck@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 at 8:06:38 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: More drive tests, was: Ext. 2.5 USB drive test
Message #241295
This is a reply to #241292.
markdvc2002 wrote: > Well, it is one of the less noticed features of logic 8, but track count > has been dramatically > improved over previous OSX versions of Logic. Not many people have > noticed, or at least, > mentioned it so far. Have you tried this with Logic 7? Yes. But that was on the old Macbook and under OSX.4.11. And most likely I won't install 7 on this one as there seem to be some slight chances of messing up my wonderfully stable 8 install (probably not, but well, no need to try that for now...). I think disk performance increased gradually with each computer and Logic revision. With the old Macbook, I could already play back almost as much tracks as a friend on his G5 2x2, so the intel move has certainly helped things a bit. Anyways, I'm still amazed that it's such a staggering difference between two machines not too far away from each other by raw numbers and an OSX update. > Disk performance in Logic 6 and 7 in OSX were much worse than for example > Nuendo > running in OSX. Yeah, I did the tests myself when I configured 2 G5s for the local music university (comparing Logic 6 and Cubase SX 2 back then). Have been quite dissapointed by Logic's poor track performance. > Logic 8 certainly has fixed that. Defenitely. And finally. And well, this time, they really seem to have it done excellently. Regards Sascha ------------------------------------
Viewed 592 times, 1 reply, 36 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.