show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 235432 of 246231 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Nick Batzdorf <recording@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 at 6:31:25 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Ivory Latency
Message #235432
Posted by: "Paul Najar" pnajar@bigpond.net.au paulnajar Thu Nov 1, 2007 9:25 pm (PST) > firewire interfaces do add little bit of CPU overhead > compared to PCI/ PCIe solutions like mine 5% more than the MOTU PCI-424, according to Activity Monitor. > so that's bad but MOTU in > particular have a good reputation for having some of the best low > latency firewire drivers in the bizz and while Logic 8 offers lower > latency at the same sample sample buffer than earlier versions it > comes at a higher CPU overhead, plus L8 itself seems to require more > CPU to run in general.... soooo overall you should be right I > reckon... The other thing I found is that the latency with FireWire interfaces is pretty much the same with all of them. Sorry to be argumentative, but I have to repeat that I was expecting to find a difference but didn't. That's on Mac. On Windows there is a definite difference between drivers, in fact the CEntrance FW driver made quite a difference. Nick Batzdorf, editor/publisher Virtual Instruments Magazine www.Virtualinstrumentsmag.com 1-877 VImagzn (846-2496) +1818/905-9101, cell 590-9101
Viewed 113 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.