|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
Posted by: "Paul Najar" pnajar@bigpond.net.au paulnajar
Thu Nov 1, 2007 9:25 pm (PST)
> firewire interfaces do add little bit of CPU overhead
> compared to PCI/ PCIe solutions like mine
5% more than the MOTU PCI-424, according to Activity Monitor.
> so that's bad but MOTU in
> particular have a good reputation for having some of the best low
> latency firewire drivers in the bizz and while Logic 8 offers lower
> latency at the same sample sample buffer than earlier versions it
> comes at a higher CPU overhead, plus L8 itself seems to require more
> CPU to run in general.... soooo overall you should be right I
> reckon...
The other thing I found is that the latency with FireWire interfaces
is pretty much the same with all of them.
Sorry to be argumentative, but I have to repeat that I was expecting
to find a difference but didn't.
That's on Mac. On Windows there is a definite difference between
drivers, in fact the CEntrance FW driver made quite a difference.
Nick Batzdorf, editor/publisher
Virtual Instruments Magazine
www.Virtualinstrumentsmag.com
1-877 VImagzn (846-2496)
+1818/905-9101, cell 590-9101
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |