dennis gunn <dennis@spn1.speednet.ne.jp> wrote: >For example I notice a strange silence on the topic >of the new sample accuracy within the arrange page. >I used to hear people talking about this issue as >if it were a deal killer. >Well now its been fixed so where is the cheering? It has been discussed, but it's not the kind of thing that needs much further elaboration or explanation. Unlike discussing, say, L8's new low-latency mode. dennis gunn <dennis@spn1.speednet.ne.jp> wrote: >Or how about the fact that there is no longer a song length limit. >Pretty cool and pretty major fundamental change so why >does nobody say nuthin? Again, it has been discussed but it needs even less explanation than the sample accurate thing. Much explanation needed to exist on the problems with a 70 minute @ 120BPM 4/4 limitation and how to work around this. Now that the song length limitation is for all intents and purposes beyond what anybody might need (it's not infinite, but it might as well be, like the fact that the amount of MIDI tracks isn't infinite, but it might as well be), then the concept of even discussing a song-length limitation no longer exists (as it always had for ProTools since day-1 and probably for various other apps). That fact that it was VERY VERY difficult to implement into Logic8 is irrelevant. It's one of those things I don't consider a cool new feature, but more in the category of a bug fix... something that should have never existed in a program created in the early 1990's. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>