show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 229150 of 246701 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "pancenter" <hwooten@dakotacom.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 at 1:56:37 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Logic Pro & MacPro 8 core CPU useage
Message #229150
This is a reply to #229141.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Dave Katz wrote: > > >On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:18 AM, pancenter wrote: > >> >>A while back I posted the current 8 core machines were actually 4 >>dual core CPU's and not yet treated as 8 separate cores. Most likely >>Logic will have to be programmed to access each core separately. > >From the standpoint of applications, you can't tell the difference >between cores or CPUs or whatever; it's just an eight processor box. > >The days of "programmed to access each core" ended in OS9; the >number of cores and the use thereof is all hidden under the >Unix/Mach scheduler buried deep in the OS. Under OSX, applications >can be run as a set of semi-independent threads, and the kernel >schedules them to run on however many processors/cores/whatever >are available. >The issue boils down to how many independent threads Logic can >assign to do heavy lifting; that number appears to be four right now. Dave, My original posting a few weeks ago pertained to the Intel quad- core processor's current limitation. Each processor being 2 dual-core chips and as yet, each core not being able to be accessed independently? From your posting it seems this is not a limitation to the OS. Thanks for the clarification. HW
Viewed 1140 times, 2 replies, 22 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.