|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Dave Katz wrote:
>
>
>On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:18 AM, pancenter wrote:
>
>>
>>A while back I posted the current 8 core machines were actually 4
>>dual core CPU's and not yet treated as 8 separate cores. Most likely
>>Logic will have to be programmed to access each core separately.
>
>From the standpoint of applications, you can't tell the difference
>between cores or CPUs or whatever; it's just an eight processor box.
>
>The days of "programmed to access each core" ended in OS9;
the
>number of cores and the use thereof is all hidden under the
>Unix/Mach scheduler buried deep in the OS. Under OSX, applications
>can be run as a set of semi-independent threads, and the kernel
>schedules them to run on however many processors/cores/whatever
>are available.
>The issue boils down to how many independent threads Logic can
>assign to do heavy lifting; that number appears to be four right now.
Dave, My original posting a few weeks ago pertained to the Intel quad-
core processor's current limitation. Each processor being 2 dual-core
chips and as yet, each core not being able to be accessed
independently? From your posting it seems this is not a limitation
to the OS. Thanks for the clarification.
HW
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |