show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 229080 of 246707 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "pancenter" <hwooten@dakotacom.net>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 at 7:52:40 AM
Subject: [LUG] Re: advice -- what kind of new computer should i get ?
Message #229080
This is a reply to #229079.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Andy Hardwake <andyhardwake@...> wrote: > Then on May 31, 2007, at 1:15 AM, Erik Häusler asked: > >>Not sure Andy, I´m talking about the audio preferences settings in >>Logic. Judging by your post I may have misunderstood what the >>processor buffer does. >>Care to shed some light on the matter? > >I am afraid I don't fully understand it myself :-) , and the >manual is rather sketchy on this... >The processor buffer set as small, medium or large (p. 380) >is "the native buffer used to compute mixes and effects", and >to my surprise it also affects the latency, especially with >processor heavy plugs. >I would really appreciate it if someone could explain it in greater >detail. This is my take on the processor buffer. The kind of "latency" the processor buffer affects is the responsiveness of the audio engine itself. If moving a volume fader using the large processor buffer, a small amount of lag can be noticed between the move and actual volume change. Theoretically one should see less CPU overloads with the processor buffer set to large, at the expense of the sequencer feeling slightly less responsive. HW
Viewed 1237 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.