show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 222848 of 246707 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "jonathankek2000" <jonathankek2000@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 at 7:09:41 PM
Subject: [LUG] Re: Mastering suggestions (Romans method)
Message #222848
This is a reply to #222842.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, George Leger III <george3@...> wrote: > As for limiters, the UAD-1 precision limiter is the best I've come > across, and I have allot of plug-in limiters. It seems to be able to > increase the volume without crushing the transients as much as > others, for the same amount of gain reduction. > > Jody Whitesides can verify this, as I just mastered an Xmas CD for > him, and he was pleased with the relative volume and sound compared > to some of the louder commercial mixes out there. > > Take care, > > George Leger III Yeah, I totally agree with George on this one. Once I bought my second UAD-1 card, I've been able to use more of the UA plug-ins in my mixes and they sound great and are very reliable. I also like Sonalksis and Roger Nichals (Elemental) Comp/Limiters and EQs. As for watching a fequency analyzer for mixing. I glance at them, but I never rely on them. IMO, you could find a perfect curve of frequencies and be mixing parts that sound bad, but have great looking frequencies curves. Just raising or lowering frequencies isn't the answer. Solid arranging and parts is the answer. And when they fall in line, you'll know with your ears, that everything sounds right. Relying on Technology only goes so far. That's a quote from George Martin; not me. Cheers
Viewed 1980 times, 2 replies, 9 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.