show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 221793 of 246707 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@goodmedia.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 at 10:42:04 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Track/CPU Test Results for the New iMac 24"?
Message #221793
This is a reply to #221777.
"Neil Marsh" <Neil@AudioBoy.net> wrote: >I'm looking into moving up to one of the new iMac 24" >models and I'm wondering if anyone has seen any test >results in terms of average numbers of tracks/plug-ins/ >softsynths/etc. on these models? Too many variables to define anything exact. Full productions have been done on far less. "Neil Marsh" <Neil@AudioBoy.net> wrote: >my current set-ups -- one on a P3 733 MHz system >with 1GB of RAM running Logic Platinum 5.5 on >WinXP Pro SP2 and one on a Dual-G4 Quicksilver >1.5 GH system with 1.5 GB RAM running Logic 7.2.3 >on OSX 10.4.8 -- The iMac will have more horsepower than both your old computers combined. Get a Mac Pro instead - you already have the screen(s) to hook up to it. Even the cheapest MacPro will outperform any iMac. And you can put a lot more RAM inside (for cheaper than the iMac's maximum of 3GB). And you can stick extra SATA drives inside (they perform way better than Firewire800, and they're way cheaper). f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>
Viewed 275 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.