show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 220602 of 246704 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "John Abram" <johnbabram@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 at 8:16:40 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [LUG] to 192k or not to 192k? 		Message #220602
This is a reply to #220595.
On 03/11/06, dennis gunn <dennis@spn1.speednet.ne.jp> wrote: > The paper at the link that Jay Asher posted contents that the > electronics doing the sampling basically become so inaccurate at the > high sampling rates that the fidelity is actually damaged. Well, at least the initials are right :-/ -- with best wishes, John http;//abram.ca
Viewed 298 times, 0 replies, 20 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.