Leslie Bell wrote: > They'd play the same performance, and > have people guess which was 192k. Not everyone could tell the > difference, but a majority of the pros there could. Interesting. I'm curious, do you know the details of how the two sources were recorded? I once heard a 192 vs 44.1 demo where the low res version was just the high res, sample converted down...which of course didn't prove very much. Clarence