show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 220561 of 246705 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "Matthew F. McCabe" <mmccabe@finleysound.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 at 1:29:45 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: to 192k or not to 192k?
Message #220561
This is a reply to #220545.
On Nov 2, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Jay Asher wrote: > Message posted by Jay Asher <jay@jayasher.com>: > > Dan Lavry, who makes some of the finest converters, says that it is > all marketing hype and that more is lost than gained with 192. If > you go to his website he has written a Whilte Paper on the subject. In a recent TapeOp interview, one of the a/d designers at Apogee said something to the effect that he thinks we only really need sampling rates around 60k to accurately reproduce music! As with any subject, there is no shortage of opinion. Matt --- King Never http://www.kingnever.com
Viewed 326 times, 0 replies, 20 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.