On Oct 1, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Keith Moore wrote: > > I did some phase cancelling tests with both on & off line > > bounces and yes in tracks with considerable cpu usage there is stuff > > that is being missed in the offline bounces, it doesn't seem to > be so > > prevalent with less complex tracks. Anyone??? > > > Dave Katz wrote > > Have you ensured that two successive bounces of the same type yield > complete cancellation? There may be some randomness factor in > something that may prevent identical results in any case. This is > worth verifying first. > The first test was a sinple (just a few audio and audio instruments) bounce... one real time, one offline. Phase cancellation was perfect.... silence. The next test was quite a complex track, around 30 tracks of audio & audio instruments, including VSL, Post's "Old Lady", (a few tracks frozen) plus lots of automation. Phase cancellation revealed a marimba. some reverb and what sounded like leakage from a delay line, I had used the Stereo Delay plug (bussed) fairly extensively. Keith Moore