|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
On Oct 1, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
> I did some phase cancelling tests with both on & off line
> bounces and yes in tracks with considerable cpu usage there is stuff
> that is being missed in the offline bounces, it doesn't seem to be so
> prevalent with less complex tracks. Anyone???
>
Have you ensured that two successive bounces of the same type yield
complete cancellation? There may be some randomness factor in
something that may prevent identical results in any case. This is
worth verifying first.
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |