> On 1.7.2006, at 2.41, Stuart Holmes wrote: > >> >> Sound Soap did the trick! (Maybe takes out a bit too much... maybe >> not, but the $99.00 is more than worth the time I'd have spent with >> my original theory or trying to use my own eq. etc! > On Jun 30, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Jorma Pennanen wrote: > Well as you can listen just the output of the filter in Sound Soap so > you can fine tune it so that it only takes out noise and nothing else. > > Cheers Right, but it still seems that there's a balance to be struck between getting all the noises while diminishing the signal just a touch, or getting most of the noise but preserving all of the desired material, especially with the broadband noise. Of course the "quality" of the noise sample makes a difference too. While in the field I will now always be sure to get 2 seconds of whatever noise is present (assuming I can't fix the noise issue at the time...) Thanks again, Stuart Holmes-