|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
>
> >Simon James wrote:
> >I've purchased a Macbook Pro and running LAP 7.2 and looking to
> >purchase an external drive to put all the music stuff on. One thing
> >is that I am looking at a Rocstor FW / USB powered drive for their
> >dependability. Are there any other recommendations?
> >Another thing is that now that there is an option for USB 2.0 as
well
> >as FW, is there any reason that there would be a preference for
> >either type other than 2.0 (I understand) is a little faster.
>
>From: "f-erenc szabo"
>Although the USB2 spec says 480Mb/s and FW400 says
>400Mb/s, USB sucks up CPU horsepower but FW doesn't.
>So it's not a clearcut situation where USB2 is 80Mb/s
>faster - not all other things are equal.
Made some tests a while back, (on PC).
Large files, heavy load:
USB 2.0 used 6.0 to 8.0 percent of the available CPU for
sustained transfers.
Firewire 400 used 1.0 to 3.0 percent of the available CPU for
the same file transfers.
I rebooted in between tests, nothing was cached.
No noticeable speed difference between FW400 or USB 2.0. in this test.
Howard
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |