|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
On 30/04/2006, at 7:55 AM, George Leger III wrote:
>
> On Apr 29, 2006, at 1:59 PM, jonathankek2000 wrote:
>
>> I've been waiting for 3 years for my UAD-1 card to be fully
>> compatible
>> with OS X and it's still not delivering the way it's supposed to,
>> hence the 70% limit on the UAD-1 card for CPU usage. My friends
doing
>> audio on the PC are making similar complaints about the UAD-1 CPU
>> efficiency.
>
>
> Anyone who has been following the UAD-1 Mac thing has a pretty good
> idea that Apples use of the AMD8131 chip is the cause of the Mac
> issues.
>
> And to stand up for UA, I have 2 UAD-1's and have found that UA
> continually add new plug-ins to the package (paid as they may be),
> and have allowed me to finally have the sound of a Roland Dimension D
> to mix with, one of my all time favorite processing units.
I'm with you George. I run 2 UAD's in a non AMD 8131 Dual 2ghz G5 and
regularly run them over 90% with complete stability and no computer
slow down.
Because I owned 2 UAD's and also a PCI audio card that I was happy
with I opted to get this G5 last November to ride out the Intel
transition for the next 2-3 years. So far so good. I'm also now
starting to get very good node performance from a dual 1GHZ G4 with a
$30 Gigabit ethernet card...
Regards
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Paul Najar
Jaminajar Music Production
www.jaminajar.com
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |