|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
On 01/08/2005, at 5:10 PM, John Pitcairn wrote:
>> You know, feedback is not even that important since it's just one
>> fader and it will only ever have one function.
>>
> LC faders _must_ get feedback, or they won't stick at the new value,
> they'll jump back to the old value. And the split fader will get
> feedback, as long as it's still defined as "fader master" in
LC Xmu.
Ah yes. I see. Sounds like you've got it covered though. And I assume
LC Xmu will deal with (filter out) the unnecessary
feedback coming from Logic itself for (in my example) the master fader?
>> When do you think you'll
>> have the new version of LC Xmu ready?
>
> Website says "by September". Guess I'd better stop adding
features, eh?
I noticed that. I was just looking at your site.
Regards
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Paul Najar
Jaminajar Music Production
www.jaminajar.com
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |