show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 196669 of 246713 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@...>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 at 5:05:18 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] The Second Proccessor
Message #196669
This is a reply to #196668.
> OSX as I feel I am on XP. I have noticed that the first proccessor seem to > do all the work. Why is that, I seem to remember that there was some kind > of workaround for this. Of course it could also be that the second one > doesn't start to work until the first one runs out of power what do I know. How it _should_ work, is that each new process thread gets started on the cpu with the least load. > I haven't really worked a lot with the Mac yet but I was messing with it > and Old Lady last night and only the first proccessor indicated activity in > system performance. That's probably because this is only one thread. If you add another softsynth or some heavy plugin (guitar amp pro, space designer) it should use power from the other cpu. Maurits.
Viewed 210 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.