On 02.05.2005, at 20:38, trevgreenbank wrote: > I figured out how to use the automation data splitter in the > transformer, and it worked > well. It seems like an overly complex operation though, why can't we > have objects respond > to CC data based on channel? MIDI has just 16 channels. You won't go very far and might be forced to convert them anyway. Btw, the fader type is not bad. If you have a couple of MIDI devices they might send a lot of messages and you wouldn't want to change some parameters by accident just because you step on a pedal. > I will try to hunt down the 4.x behaviour setting you > mention. Yes, if that is easier for you, no problem. You can always switch back to usual behavior if you want to do more. > Is the idea that i'm to get this dream i have cabled up within my > autoload song > so i only have to do it once? First answer: yes. Second answer: I don't believe it :) You can copy environment objects between songs. You can even have a couple of setups in a separate song (on named layers) and import a certain layer into any song. > I am going to upgrade to pro when i get my tax refund in 3 > weeks. Is this kind of thing going to be easier then? I was wondering > did Apple "dumb > down" the environment at all? It is not easier. And it is surely not better - but it is here. But you will get "Controller Assignments" which can learn MIDI messages for plugins. Unfortunately you cannot store them but for a quick setup they are ok. > YOU are Obi Wan! Don't tell anybody. I do not want to have all those guys with their idiotic swords around here. ___ Peter Ostry