show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 176359 of 246691 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: dennis gunn <dennis@...>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 at 7:10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] Latency: Logic 7 vs. Cubase SX3
Message #176359
This is a reply to #176117.
On Nov 1, 2004, at 12:37 PM, Orren Merton wrote: > > There seem to be two threads about performance that have come up in > this forum: Latency (you want very low latency for tracking via > software monitoring, if you need to track through effects such as a > guitar amp) and Disk/Track count (which you want very high for large > projects). > > This is NOT a test for track count. I set out to do a latency > comparison between Logic 7 and Cubase SX3. Thanks for doing that Orren but I have to point out that your test methodology does not reflect what I would be doing if I were trying to get around the latency problems. What I would be doing is freezing everything that was not getting tracked live then just worrying about the live tracks so it really would not matter what was on the other tracks. In fact this is what I do in logic now when I am trying to use guitar amp or guitar rig or Space Designer for live monitoring. So I am still wondering from your test if I can do that or not.
Viewed 2570 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.