show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 169674 of 246662 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "xavdav" <xtrad@...>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 at 4:18:12 PM
Subject: Re: TC Powercore vs UAD-1 or G5? Or Both?
Message #169674
This is a reply to #169671.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, M-De <mattdesoulman@y...> wrote: > I own a Powercore PCI and I find that it doesn't work that > efficiently with Logic on individual tracks because of the > latency issue. If you use the "non-latency mode" (by > clicking the Powercore insignia in the bottom left corner > of whatever plug-in) it ramps up the CPU processing meter, > and if you "optimize" the settings in Logic and the > Powercore application for better performance (per the TC > Electronic website; Optimizing Your Powercore with Logic) > you end up operating Logic at very high-latency settings > especially for live input recording. For example, the > Tubifex plug, IMO, sounds great.....however, it's almost > impossible to use it in a live recording situation because > of the latency. > > I understand that the UAD-1 doesn't even have "non-latency > mode"? Seems kinda bothersome to me. any thoughts..... > > Matt As far as I understand these plugins are not made for tracking. They are primarily for mixing and mastering. That's what I use them for. Thus, latency is pretty much a non-issue except for busses when the compensator plugins must be used. -Xav
Viewed 1443 times, 0 replies, 18 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.