--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "Dyskin Family" >FWIW, I'm considering the opposite move because logic is now going to >stagnate on windows, and there are some memory use bugs that will >never be fixed. On the other hand, logic is a great program and I >don't know if Cubase can give me everything that logic does. > >Cheers, Brian, I've found that Cubase SX (and especially SX v2) more than adequately fills the void that Logic leaves behind. But, you can't say, "this doesn't work like Logic", because it doesn't. Just like Logic doesn't work like SX. If you take it on it's own terms and don't expect immediate miracles you will find many positives. SX has a fully compensated bus system, there are no adjustments to be made, all inserts, sends and FX buses are fully compensated. VST instruments work much better. SX since version 1.03 has been rock solid. Of course... some of it depends on your main use of the program, there's no doubt in my mind that SX 2 has the superior audio features and implementation, I still give nod to Logic's ergonomics and MIDI feature set. However, I am finding that Cubase SX2 has closed the MIDI gap considerably. The other positive is that Steinberg fully supports the PC platform. Howard Cactus Patch Music http://cactuspatchmusic.com/mp3s/