show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 162539 of 246662 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Mothra <mothra@...>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 at 12:10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [LUG] So is 10.3.3 any better than 10.3.2 on a G4?
Message #162539
This is a reply to #162537.
Glenn at Schadowrider wrote: > Our G4 is only a Quicksilver 867; 10.3.2 was the first version of X3 we put > up -- it was sooooo slow at screen draws, etc., so as to be outright > painful. 10.3.3 was a huge pickup in performance but still too slow; you > will probably get a much better boost toward something nice with your dual. > I don't recall the details, but I seem to recall .3 was supposed to have a > lot of GUI performance improvements over .2.... > > FWIW, combining this with a lot of other reasons, we decided to up to a 2G > G5 fully loaded w/ 8G of memory (which, while we love it overall, has in > turn given us some real problems being able to use our UAD card). > > -Glenn @ Schadowrider Interesting. I have a Quicksilver 2002 800, and have never had any problems with the screen redraws in ANY version of OS X.. Theyve all worked just as advertised for me... -- Chris http://www.descentrecords.com
Viewed 2827 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.