show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 151191 of 246657 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "John Pitcairn" <johnp@...>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 at 4:32:32 PM
Subject: Re: [LAM] Logic slower on OSX F.A.O JP
Message #151191
This is a reply to #151146.
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, Gareth Henderson <gareth@s...> wrote: > Could you clarify that. I'm getting a horrible feeling I've just made a > stupid mistake. I've just taken delivery of a PCI/Digiface combo to go in my > new G5. Replacing the Hammerfall 9652 in my G4, because 1) fewer pci slots > and 2) I figured that as the buffer setting needs to be set higher under OS > X to suit my TC Powercore, I could get round the latency that will cause by > using Total Mix. Is that not gonna work in OS X? It works fine. RME's "ZLM" (zero latency monitoring) offers <1ms latency when monitoring through TotalMix. What doesn't work yet, because CoreAudio hasn't supported it and no hosts support it, is the CoreAudio equivalent of Steinberg's "ASIO Direct Monitoring" protocol, whereby the host software controls the Totalmix monitoring volume directly according to the host's channel volume/pan settings. From what I can remember, that didn't work on OS9 in Logic either... John Pitcairn
Viewed 431 times, 0 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.