> And: From all my colleagues I know, that the most annoying thing is not that there is a feature that's not there. We can all live with that and improvise our way around it. Hell, that's the beauty and that gives the best ideas. But the real problem are the bugs and the things that slow us down. I'm in the other camp: I prefer to work around bugs and have the features I desire. The worst for me is the total lack of recording offset capabilities. Add to that the inability to simply nudge a selection of regions by a user-determined amount, and the situation is incredibly frustrating for me at times. With my workflow, it tends to be the lack of features that slows me down more than the bugs. It's my perception that Logic is in a place where eMagic would serve both current and potential customers best by taking a balanced approach. There are bugs which are simply too egregious to not fix asap, and there are really basic, major features missing from the picture. I don't believe there's any reason we should have to choose, eMagic is clever and resourceful enough to make it happen. Take care, u b i k