|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
>>
>> The way the poll states this issue is different than the original
remark by
>> Peter Duemmler. One option in the poll basically states that you
want to
>> pay for bug fixes (a Logic 7) (or is upgrading say from 6.3 to 6.5
>> included?). The same opinion is expressed by some people on the
list here;
>> it is okay for them to pay for bug fixes.
>
> Ok, to me (!) the difference between an update an an upgrade is: the
> first is free the second is paid for.
So then I am right that this poll states this issue different than the
original remark by Peter Duemmler. He did not want to pay; no logic 7 before
the bugs are fixed.
> If the wording is too misleading I will start a poll on that and take
> down the first poll.
The wording is clear (sorry for my confusing 'or is upgrading say from 6.3
to 6.5 included?)-question. But since the wording is clear the main issue of
my previous posting ('strange message to Emagic: lets pay for bug fixes')
still goes.
Best, Merlin Juliard.
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |