show first message show previous message Showing Logic-users Message 149345 of 246214 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Juliard <tothcwizard@...>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 at 9:43:48 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] [LAM]Any mention of Logic 7?
Message #149345
This is a reply to #149342.
>> >> The way the poll states this issue is different than the original remark by >> Peter Duemmler. One option in the poll basically states that you want to >> pay for bug fixes (a Logic 7) (or is upgrading say from 6.3 to 6.5 >> included?). The same opinion is expressed by some people on the list here; >> it is okay for them to pay for bug fixes. > > Ok, to me (!) the difference between an update an an upgrade is: the > first is free the second is paid for. So then I am right that this poll states this issue different than the original remark by Peter Duemmler. He did not want to pay; no logic 7 before the bugs are fixed. > If the wording is too misleading I will start a poll on that and take > down the first poll. The wording is clear (sorry for my confusing 'or is upgrading say from 6.3 to 6.5 included?)-question. But since the wording is clear the main issue of my previous posting ('strange message to Emagic: lets pay for bug fixes') still goes. Best, Merlin Juliard.
Viewed 608 times, 1 reply, 31 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.