At 15:05 Uhr +0100 01.11.2003, Juliard wrote: >Peter Duemmler wrote: > >>>> I hope that EVERYONE who reads this board will agree that there >>>> should NOT be a Logic 7 until ALL of the bugs in 6 a fixed!!! > >And Hans Hafner wrote: >> > > I've created a poll about this here: snip > > I will send the results to Emagic. > >The way the poll states this issue is different than the original remark by >Peter Duemmler. One option in the poll basically states that you want to >pay for bug fixes (a Logic 7) (or is upgrading say from 6.3 to 6.5 >included?). The same opinion is expressed by some people on the list here; >it is okay for them to pay for bug fixes. Ok, to me (!) the difference between an update an an upgrade is: the first is free the second is paid for. If the wording is too misleading I will start a poll on that and take down the first poll. I think (but that's me) that it's pretty clear what this poll means, but if it is the general consensus it's not, let me know, or start another one that's worded right. Though I foresee the danger of a discussion on semantics. Cheers Hans