|
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!
--- In logic-users@yahoogroups.com, "John Pitcairn" wrote:
> ...
> That's just how the multiple interface support works, on Mac OS 9 or
> Windows. The interfaces each have separate audio engines (which
> equates to audio mixers), with no internal routing between them. So
> you can't, for example, send from track 1 on interface A to a bus on
> interface B, or assign interface A outputs for interface B tracks
(etc).
Thanks, John!
I was kinda suspecting that that might be the case (but I gave up
trying to work it out, 'cos I was wasting too much time on it).
What I'd /hoped/ to do was plug in the pod via USB and use it on an
effects loop, digital-domain, while my other interface was running
the stereo mix. And apparently that doesn't work <frown>.
Wiring up a PodXT via analog works, but then you have a whole bunch
of extra cables and you only have a mono input, so you can't use the
POD this way to use it as a valve or amp simulator on a stereo track
(which is great fun for whacky grunge effects <grin>).
I suppose the rackmount "pro" version has the optical ins and outs
and stuff that would be handy for that. I don't know if the
PodXTdrivers are multi-hardware or not, if they are, you /might/ be
able to run a couple of PodXTs together or a PodXT and a GuitarPort
to get the additional outputs ... dunno.
I guess that this is where OSX probably has the big advantage ...
except that the PodXT drivers for OSX aren't quite ready yet.
Oh well, we are slowly getting there, I guess.
Forum Index | Read LUG: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search! © 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved. |