Logic Users Group (LUG)- Logic-users Message Index for Feb 2002

#93547: [LUG] FMHeaven - How Do I? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:47:43 AM 0000 GMT
#93570: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:56:24 AM 0000 GMT
#93571: OT : (Harvey Mann) - New Audio Bench Test available. (WAS LAW: AMD XP 1800 vs Pentium) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:42:49 AM 0000 GMT
#93572: Re: [LAM]450MP vs.800MP vs. godzilla Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:55:45 AM 0000 GMT
#93573: [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:17:50 AM 0000 GMT
#93574: RE: Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... huh? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:18:03 AM 0000 GMT
#93575: Yo John we should hook up some time Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:50:19 AM 0000 GMT
#93576: GEN: C-Lab Creator-to-Logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:44:33 AM 0000 GMT
#93577: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:55:34 AM 0000 GMT
#93578: RE: Gen-Cycle Record not working Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:54:06 AM 0000 GMT
#93579: LAM: Exs24 Hi-Hat question Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:55:42 AM 0000 GMT
#93580: Re: LAMP Computer stops mid-bounce Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:06:56 AM 0000 GMT
#93581: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:04:45 AM 0000 GMT
#93582: FW: [LUG] GEN: C-Lab Creator-to-Logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:15:03 AM 0000 GMT
#93583: LAMP - mounting disc images to the CD rom drive Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:18:03 AM 0000 GMT
#93584: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:24:40 AM 0000 GMT
#93585: Re: FW: [LUG] GEN: C-Lab Creator-to-Logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:29:36 AM 0000 GMT
#93586: [LUG] RE: Re: no ext editor, no offline bounce, no automation..a Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:27:35 AM 0000 GMT
#93587: Re: [LUG] ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:30:53 AM 0000 GMT
#93588: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN: why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:30:00 AM 0000 GMT
#93589: Re: [LUG] Anyboy getting LOGIC 5 or LOGIC control on his/her Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:32:06 AM 0000 GMT
#93590: RE: [LUG] [LAW] HELP!!! SOMEBODY please respond! Need Enviroment! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 2:54:08 PM 0000 GMT
#93591: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:01:46 AM 0000 GMT
#93592: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:10:15 AM 0000 GMT
#93593: Re: [LUG] [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:14:18 AM 0000 GMT
#93594: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:11:06 AM 0000 GMT
#93595: Re: [LUG] [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:15:57 AM 0000 GMT
#93596: Re: [LUG] [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:26:32 AM 0000 GMT
#93597: We've better stuff to worry about than bits... (was: Re: [LUG] Re: 64 vs 80 bit floating point numbers, Does It Really Matter?) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:22:54 AM 0000 GMT
#93598: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:37:37 AM 0000 GMT
#93599: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN: why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:22:14 AM 0000 GMT
#93603: RE: Gen-Cycle Record not working Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:25:40 AM 0000 GMT
#93605: Re: [Gen] FMHeaven - How Do I? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:27:38 AM 0000 GMT
#93606: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:44:12 AM 0000 GMT
#93608: Re: [LUG] [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:39:38 AM 0000 GMT
#93609: [OT] Why not RME Hammerfall? (was: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs...) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:37:56 AM 0000 GMT
#93610: Re: [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:38:48 AM 0000 GMT
#93612: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:48:34 AM 0000 GMT
#93613: [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:53:08 AM 0000 GMT
#93614: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:54:50 AM 0000 GMT
#93615: [LUG] GEN: Crossfades... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:58:11 AM 0000 GMT
#93616: Re: [LUG] Re: OT RME card as a choice for Mac LAMP Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:37:02 AM 0000 GMT
#93617: Re: [LUG] Re: [Gen] FMHeaven - How Do I? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:52:59 AM 0000 GMT
#93618: Re: [LUG] Re: LAW: AMD XP 1800 vs Pentium Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:40:43 AM 0000 GMT
#93619: Re: [LUG] ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:58:02 AM 0000 GMT
#93620: RE: [LUG] OT RME card as a choice for Mac LAMP Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:54:20 AM 0000 GMT
#93621: Re: (LUG) GEN: why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:00:43 AM 0000 GMT
#93622: Re: FW: [LUG] GEN: C-Lab Creator-to-Logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:03:00 AM 0000 GMT
#93629: OT: DS2416 : the new 4.0b driver is worth a look ! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:58:50 AM 0000 GMT
#93630: Yam. DS2416 + LAMP? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:27:29 AM 0000 GMT
#93637: Re: [LUG] ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:49:29 AM 0000 GMT
#93638: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:14:39 AM 0000 GMT
#93639: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:06:33 AM 0000 GMT
#93640: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:09:50 AM 0000 GMT
#93641: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN: why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Folks.... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:09:59 AM 0000 GMT
#93642: Re: [LUG] ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:13:15 AM 0000 GMT
#93643: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:15:08 AM 0000 GMT
#93644: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAW] M-Audio WDM drivers Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:16:18 AM 0000 GMT
#93645: Re: [LUG] OT: New MOTU 828/896 Driver (v2.1) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:20:14 AM 0000 GMT
#93646: [LUG] OT: PROTEST! RISE UP! and all of that good stuff... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:35:59 AM 0000 GMT
#93647: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:37:58 AM 0000 GMT
#93648: [LUG] [LAM] Performa 610 vs. Dual 1GHz Powermac G4 Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:42:36 AM 0000 GMT
#93649: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:48:20 AM 0000 GMT
#93650: LAM: Apple wins Grammy Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:05:02 AM 0000 GMT
#93651: Re: [LUG]Mixerless studio, Is it a native reality?? was Dual Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:27:36 AM 0000 GMT
#93652: Re: [LAWP] How to do this... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:24:15 AM 0000 GMT
#93653: Re: [LAW]: other tracks on audio track Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:27:53 AM 0000 GMT
#93654: [LUG] Re: no ext editor, no offline bounce, no automation..a lemmon? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:35:59 AM 0000 GMT
#93655: Re: [LUG] OT: PROTEST! RISE UP! and all of that good stuff... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:36:34 AM 0000 GMT
#93656: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:41:48 AM 0000 GMT
#93657: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:06:03 PM 0000 GMT
#93658: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN: why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Folks.... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:06:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93659: Re: [LUG] Returning logic 4.0 Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:10:45 PM 0000 GMT
#93660: Re: [LUG] OT: PROTEST! RISE UP! and all of that good stuff... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:16:23 PM 0000 GMT
#93661: Re: [LUG] GEN: C-Lab Creator-to-Logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:25:48 PM 0000 GMT
#93662: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:28:08 PM 0000 GMT
#93663: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:39:16 PM 0000 GMT
#93664: Re: LAMP: Do older ibooks/pb's work with logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:41:53 PM 0000 GMT
#93665: re: GEN: C-Lab Creator-to-Logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:52:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93666: [GEN] strip silence for sequence / midi objects Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:50:22 PM 0000 GMT
#93667: Re: [LUG] LAM: Exs24 Hi-Hat question Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:54:44 AM 0000 GMT
#93668: Re: LAMP Computer stops mid-bounce Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 12:58:40 PM 0000 GMT
#93669: Re: [LUG] LAMP: Steinberg Voice Machine Woes Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 1:02:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93670: Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 1:08:20 PM 0000 GMT
#93671: Re: [LAWP] How to do this... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 1:10:05 PM 0000 GMT
#93672: RE: [LUG] [GEN] strip silence for sequence / midi objects Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 1:19:02 PM 0000 GMT
#93673: Re: [LUG] FMHeaven - How Do I? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 1:25:34 PM 0000 GMT
#93674: Re: ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 1:53:18 PM 0000 GMT
#93675: Re: [LAW]: other tracks on audio track Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 1:59:57 PM 0000 GMT
#93676: Re: Re: [LAM]450MP vs.800MP vs. godzilla Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 2:14:44 PM 0000 GMT
#93677: Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 2:17:11 PM 0000 GMT
#93678: [LUG] Re: LAW: AMD XP 1800 vs Pentium Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 2:36:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93679: Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 2:55:12 PM 0000 GMT
#93680: Re: [LUG] LAW laptop and logic survey Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 2:55:37 PM 0000 GMT
#93681: Re: LAW 4.8 and SW1000XG Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 3:27:57 PM 0000 GMT
#93682: Re: [LUG] GEN: Crossfades... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 3:42:44 PM 0000 GMT
#93683: LAMP:groove templates Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:05:15 PM 0000 GMT
#93684: Re: Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:17:40 PM 0000 GMT
#93685: Re: [LUG] GEN: Crossfades... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:10:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93686: New Midi Frohmage Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:18:33 PM 0000 GMT
#93687: Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:48:33 PM 0000 GMT
#93688: Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:53:07 PM 0000 GMT
#93689: RE: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:03:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93690: Re:Re: ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:17:27 PM 0000 GMT
#93691: Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:13:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93692: Re: OT: DS2416 : the new 4.0b driver is worth a look ! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:19:56 PM 0000 GMT
#93693: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:35:45 PM 0000 GMT
#93694: Re: OT: DS2416 : the new 4.0b driver is worth a look ! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:48:25 PM 0000 GMT
#93695: [LUG] RE: Re: no ext editor, no offline bounce, no automation..a lemmon? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:59:24 PM 0000 GMT
#93696: LAMP: Powercore latency Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:08:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93697: Re: [LUG] Yo John we should hook up some time Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:33:06 PM 0000 GMT
#93698: Re: [LUG] FMHeaven - How Do I? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:41:50 PM 0000 GMT
#93699: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN: why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:05:05 PM 0000 GMT
#93700: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN: why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:51:03 PM 0000 GMT
#93701: Re: [LUG] OT: PROTEST! RISE UP! and all of that good stuff... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:09:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93702: Re: [LUG] ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:02:20 PM 0000 GMT
#93703: Re: [LUG] [LAWP] How to do this... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:26:27 PM 0000 GMT
#93704: [LUG] Re: [LAWP] How to do this... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:18:46 PM 0000 GMT
#93705: MIDI with MT4 in OS X... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:27:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93706: Re: [LUG] Re: LAMP Computer stops mid-bounce Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:28:23 PM 0000 GMT
#93707: [LUG] RE: Re: no ext editor, no offline bounce, no automation..a Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:33:10 PM 0000 GMT
#93708: Re: Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:48:45 PM 0000 GMT
#93709: Re: [LUG] LAMP: Powercore latency Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:51:00 PM 0000 GMT
#93710: Re: Yam. DS2416 + LAMP? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:55:42 PM 0000 GMT
#93711: [LUG] Re: [LAM]450MP vs.800MP vs. godzilla Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:57:23 PM 0000 GMT
#93712: [LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:57:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93713: Re: TDM vs. Native on super fast, dual proc. Macs? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:09:52 PM 0000 GMT
#93714: RE: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:07:21 PM 0000 GMT
#93715: GEN: freeware vsti's Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:15:27 PM 0000 GMT
#93716: OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:17:49 PM 0000 GMT
#93717: Re: [LUG] LAMP: Powercore latency Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:21:08 PM 0000 GMT
#93718: Re: [LUG] LAMP: Powercore latency Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:21:50 PM 0000 GMT
#93719: Problems with EXS authorisation Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:23:21 PM 0000 GMT
#93720: Re: Re: Re: Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:31:10 PM 0000 GMT
#93721: [GEN] Create new track HELP! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:26:14 PM 0000 GMT
#93722: Re: [GEN] Create new track HELP! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:40:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93723: [LAW] Good results on XP and M-Audio? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:54:02 PM 0000 GMT
#93724: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Create new track HELP! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:54:07 PM 0000 GMT
#93725: Re: [LUG] GEN: freeware vsti's Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:58:49 PM 0000 GMT
#93726: Re: [LUG] Problems with EXS authorisation Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:01:52 PM 0000 GMT
#93727: Re: [LUG] LAMP: Powercore latency Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:10:44 PM 0000 GMT
#93728: AW: [LUG] Problems with EXS authorisation Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:12:56 PM 0000 GMT
#93729: Re: [LUG] GEN v5 Review Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:42:18 PM 0000 GMT
#93730: Re: [LUG] [GEN] strip silence for sequence / midi objects Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:52:12 PM 0000 GMT
#93731: Re:Re: ot: michael cretu (enigma) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 8:56:50 PM 0000 GMT
#93732: RE: [LUG] [LAW] confirmed chipsets (was: Via 266A chipset) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:03:37 PM 0000 GMT
#93733: Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:09:11 PM 0000 GMT
#93734: Re: [LUG] What disadvantages do analog synths have in a midi studio? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:13:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93735: Re: [LUG] OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:24:50 PM 0000 GMT
#93736: Re: GEN: freeware vsti's Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:46:16 PM 0000 GMT
#93737: Re: [LUG] [GEN] strip silence for sequence / midi objects Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:51:28 PM 0000 GMT
#93738: Re: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:52:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93739: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 9:56:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93740: re: [GEN]: freeware vsti's Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:13:08 PM 0000 GMT
#93741: Re: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:24:37 PM 0000 GMT
#93742: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:45:56 PM 0000 GMT
#93743: Re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:49:02 PM 0000 GMT
#93744: AW: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:56:16 PM 0000 GMT
#93745: re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:18:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93746: Re: [LUG] MIDI with MT4 in OS X... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:41:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93747: Re: [LUG] OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:46:57 PM 0000 GMT
#93748: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:54:20 PM 0000 GMT
#93749: Re: [LUG] LOGIC CONTROL ! a Joke ? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:51:11 PM 0000 GMT
#93750: LAW: P4+RDRAM(i850 chipset) vs P4+DDR(i845D chipset)... +1000 MB/ Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:55:16 PM 0000 GMT
#93751: Re: AW: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:07:12 AM 0000 GMT
#93752: Antw: AW: [LUG] vst midi Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:11:45 AM 0000 GMT
#93753: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:00:58 AM 0000 GMT
#93754: RE: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:04:20 AM 0000 GMT
#93755: Re: [LUG] MIDI with MT4 in OS X... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:06:31 AM 0000 GMT
#93756: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:08:14 AM 0000 GMT
#93757: Re: [LUG] LOGIC CONTROL ! a Joke ? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:18:05 AM 0000 GMT
#93758: [gen] LOGIC 5 and LOGIC CONTROL press release? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:22:39 AM 0000 GMT
#93759: Re: [LUG] OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:55:43 AM 0000 GMT
#93760: [LAMP] no sound when "bouncing"(?) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:57:22 AM 0000 GMT
#93761: Re: [LUG] OT: New MOTU 828/896 Driver (v2.1) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:54:15 AM 0000 GMT
#93762: RE: [LUG] OT: New MOTU 828/896 Driver (v2.1) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:57:21 AM 0000 GMT
#93763: RE: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:14:40 AM 0000 GMT
#93764: Re: OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:17:50 AM 0000 GMT
#93765: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:32:28 AM 0000 GMT
#93766: Re: [LUG] OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:10:11 AM 0000 GMT
#93767: Re: [LUG] Re: OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:19:31 AM 0000 GMT
#93768: Re: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:19:06 AM 0000 GMT
#93769: Re: LAW 4.8 and SW1000XG Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:35:36 AM 0000 GMT
#93770: Re: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:41:58 AM 0000 GMT
#93771: Re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 4:40:02 AM 0000 GMT
#93772: Re: Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 5:39:15 AM 0000 GMT
#93773: [LAW] Logic Audio and Dual Processor PC Support (the official word) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 5:48:39 AM 0000 GMT
#93774: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:04:36 AM 0000 GMT
#93775: Re: LAM: Apple wins Grammy Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:06:35 AM 0000 GMT
#93776: Re: [LAW] Logic Audio and Dual Processor PC Support (the official word) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:19:00 AM 0000 GMT
#93777: Re: [gen] LOGIC 5 and LOGIC CONTROL press release? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:23:10 AM 0000 GMT
#93778: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:54:22 AM 0000 GMT
#93779: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:04:14 AM 0000 GMT
#93780: Re: [LUG] Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:11:02 AM 0000 GMT
#93781: Re: [LUG] LAMP: Powercore latency Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:35:11 AM 0000 GMT
#93782: Re: [LUG] GEN: freeware vsti's Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:53:45 AM 0000 GMT
#93783: Re: [LUG] Re: Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:55:35 AM 0000 GMT
#93784: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:03:13 AM 0000 GMT
#93785: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:05:17 AM 0000 GMT
#93786: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:22:12 AM 0000 GMT
#93787: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle/song format Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:24:50 AM 0000 GMT
#93788: Re: OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:55:21 AM 0000 GMT
#93789: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:10:46 AM 0000 GMT
#93790: Re: [GEN] FMHeaven - How Do I? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:19:18 AM 0000 GMT
#93791: Re: [LUG] GEN: freeware vsti's Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:28:27 AM 0000 GMT
#93792: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:41:44 AM 0000 GMT
#93793: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle/song format Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:41:44 AM 0000 GMT
#93794: Re: [LUG] Re: [GEN] Consolidate track / render track Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:55:10 AM 0000 GMT
#93795: [LAMP] Midi dropping out w/OMS Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:00:06 AM 0000 GMT
#93796: LAWP - sync with MTP AV Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:03:42 AM 0000 GMT
#93797: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:09:49 AM 0000 GMT
#93798: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:17:30 AM 0000 GMT
#93799: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:28:14 AM 0000 GMT
#93800: [LUG] OT: Archos mini cdwr firewire Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:39:33 AM 0000 GMT
#93801: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:03:35 AM 0000 GMT
#93802: Re: [LUG] Re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:09:52 PM 0000 GMT
#93803: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle/song format Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:57:13 AM 0000 GMT
#93804: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:58:17 AM 0000 GMT
#93805: [Gen] How much longer Michael.......? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:16:24 PM 0000 GMT
#93806: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:21:45 PM 0000 GMT
#93807: Re: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:13:14 PM 0000 GMT
#93808: Re: AW: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:19:45 PM 0000 GMT
#93809: [LUG] Re: [GEN] FMHeaven - How Do I? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:26:10 PM 0000 GMT
#93810: AW: [LUG] GEN: freeware vsti's Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:54:12 PM 0000 GMT
#93811: gen : why asus? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 1:13:27 PM 0000 GMT
#93812: [GEN] Re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM / LAWP Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 1:21:50 PM 0000 GMT
#93813: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 1:24:35 PM 0000 GMT
#93814: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM / LAWP Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 1:33:29 PM 0000 GMT
#93815: LAMP - mounting akai disc images... Again Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 1:27:48 PM 0000 GMT
#93816: LAW bus send limitation? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 1:44:51 PM 0000 GMT
#93817: Re: [LUG] GEN: freeware vsti's Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:02:00 PM 0000 GMT
#93818: Re: [LUG] LAW bus send limitation? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:09:50 PM 0000 GMT
#93819: Re: Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:11:08 PM 0000 GMT
#93820: Re: [LUG] LAW bus send limitation? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:24:35 PM 0000 GMT
#93821: Re: [LUG] Returning Logic 4.0 dongle/song format Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:29:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93822: Re: [LUG] LAW bus send limitation? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:35:24 PM 0000 GMT
#93823: Re: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 2:53:52 PM 0000 GMT
#93824: Re: Antw: AW: [LUG] vst midi Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:06:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93825: Re: AW: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:07:25 PM 0000 GMT
#93826: Re: [LUG] LAW bus send limitation? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:07:02 PM 0000 GMT
#93827: AW: AW: [LUG] New Midi Frohmage Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:13:28 PM 0000 GMT
#93828: GEN: Bugfixing in v. 4.0 (was: GEN: freeware vsti's) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:15:46 PM 0000 GMT
#93829: AW: [LUG] GEN: Bugfixing in v. 4.0 (was: GEN: freeware vsti's) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:22:15 PM 0000 GMT
#93830: GEN - Wave Burner Pro for Windows? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:39:46 PM 0000 GMT
#93831: Re: GEN: freeware vsti's Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:49:03 PM 0000 GMT
#93832: Re: [LUG] GEN - Wave Burner Pro for Windows? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:52:57 PM 0000 GMT
#93833: Re: Re: Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:59:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93834: re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:57:57 PM 0000 GMT
#93835: Re:Re: ot: michael cretu (enigma) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 4:09:52 PM 0000 GMT
#93836: gen : why asus? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 4:18:15 PM 0000 GMT
#93837: OT: console environments needed Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 4:20:48 PM 0000 GMT
#93838: Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 4:26:43 PM 0000 GMT
#93839: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 4:08:16 PM 0000 GMT
#93840: Re: [LUG] gen : why asus? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 4:54:18 PM 0000 GMT
#93841: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 5:13:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93842: [OT] "Psycho" Acoustics - Super Audio CD vs DVD-Audio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 5:18:55 PM 0000 GMT
#93843: Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:23:36 PM 0000 GMT
#93844: Re: Re:Re: ot: michael cretu (enigma) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:21:35 PM 0000 GMT
#93845: RE: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:42:59 PM 0000 GMT
#93846: RE: [LUG] Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:01:06 PM 0000 GMT
#93847: LAW - Problems with EXS24, ES1 authorisation Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 2:17:57 PM 0000 GMT
#93848: Re: OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:00:19 PM 0000 GMT
#93849: Re: [LUG] OT: New MOTU 828/896 Driver (v2.1) Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 10:32:18 AM 0000 GMT
#93850: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 3:38:36 PM 0000 GMT
#93851: LAMP - anybody using MOTU 828 (Firewire) with a Dualprocessor-Mac? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:01:11 PM 0000 GMT
#93852: Re: [LUG] GEN: freeware vsti's Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:14:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93853: Re: GEN - Wave Burner Pro for Windows? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:20:40 PM 0000 GMT
#93854: Re: [LUG] Yam. DS2416 + LAMP? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:00:49 PM 0000 GMT
#93855: Re: [LAWP] How to do this... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 4:22:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93856: Re: LAMP: Do older ibooks/pb's work with logic? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 5:14:16 PM 0000 GMT
#93857: Re: [LUG] OT: DS2416 : the new 4.0b driver is worth a look ! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 6:49:34 PM 0000 GMT
#93858: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Create new track HELP! Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:32:01 PM 0000 GMT
#93859: [LUG] Re: [Gen] FMHeaven - How Do I? Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 7:36:35 PM 0000 GMT
#93860: [LUG] (LUG) GEN:Dual monitors Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:20:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93861: Re: [LUG] [LAWP] How to do this... Fri, 1 Feb 2002 at 11:31:25 PM 0000 GMT
#93862: LAM JL Cooper CS 10 II Remote Controller Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 12:19:21 AM 0000 GMT
#93863: Re: [LUG] Re: TDM vs. Native on super fast, dual proc. Macs? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 9:31:21 AM 0000 GMT
#93864: Re: [LUG] LAWP Play lag with win2k and Fat32 THE FACTS Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:29:20 PM 0000 GMT
#93865: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN:Dual monitors Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:34:00 PM 0000 GMT
#93866: Re: [LUG] LAMP MP & DIGI001 Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:59:45 AM 0000 GMT
#93867: Subject: LAM+ Remote Controller: JL Cooper CS 10II? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:47:46 PM 0000 GMT
#93868: LAGW basic request : dongle cabling Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 3:48:32 PM 0000 GMT
#93869: Re: LAMP - anybody using MOTU 828 (Firewire) with a Dualprocessor-Mac? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:35:47 PM 0000 GMT
#93870: Re: [LAW]:Windows XP and Unitor8... Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 6:09:39 PM 0000 GMT
#93871: Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:36:08 PM 0000 GMT
#93872: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for Fire Wire Hard Drive Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 7:50:07 PM 0000 GMT
#93873: GEN: bugfixing and ethics (was: GEN: freeware vsti's) Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:28:03 PM 0000 GMT
#93874: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:31:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93875: Re: LAGW basic request : dongle cabling Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:34:55 PM 0000 GMT
#93876: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:33:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93877: RE: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:49:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93878: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:51:43 PM 0000 GMT
#93879: Re: [LUG] no ext editor, no offline bounce, no automation..a lemmon? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:57:22 PM 0000 GMT
#93880: Re: [LUG] [ADMIN] group buy -> answer privately please Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 9:02:21 PM 0000 GMT
#93881: [LAM] the grand Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:21:39 PM 0000 GMT
#93882: Re: Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 8:13:49 PM 0000 GMT
#93883: Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 9:18:14 PM 0000 GMT
#93884: Re: [LUG] [LAM] the grand Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 9:28:41 PM 0000 GMT
#93885: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 9:38:47 PM 0000 GMT
#93886: AW: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:19:19 PM 0000 GMT
#93887: AW: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:21:49 PM 0000 GMT
#93888: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:51:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93889: Re: Multi timbral VST Instruments LAPM Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 10:47:56 PM 0000 GMT
#93890: Re: SMP in OS X Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:04:22 PM 0000 GMT
#93891: [GEN] Environment similar to Spark FX Machine Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:00:32 PM 0000 GMT
#93892: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:24:03 PM 0000 GMT
#93893: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:31:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93894: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Environment similar to Spark FX Machine Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:35:00 PM 0000 GMT
#93895: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:27:40 PM 0000 GMT
#93896: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:39:23 PM 0000 GMT
#93897: [LAWP] Backups anyone? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:36:00 AM 0000 GMT
#93898: Re: [LUG] [GEN] strip silence for sequence / midi objects Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:42:13 AM 0000 GMT
#93899: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:14:47 AM 0000 GMT
#93900: [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:31:52 AM 0000 GMT
#93901: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:36:52 AM 0000 GMT
#93902: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:42:18 AM 0000 GMT
#93903: Re: [LUG] LAMP - mounting akai disc images... Again Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:41:28 AM 0000 GMT
#93904: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAMP] G4 800 DP - how many PVs do you get? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:42:35 AM 0000 GMT
#93905: Re: [LUG] [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:52:55 AM 0000 GMT
#93906: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:54:56 AM 0000 GMT
#93907: Re: [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:57:18 AM 0000 GMT
#93908: Re: [LUG] [OT] "Psycho" Acoustics - Super Audio CD vs DVD-Audio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:04:10 AM 0000 GMT
#93909: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:07:12 AM 0000 GMT
#93910: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:09:22 AM 0000 GMT
#93911: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN:Dual monitors Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:13:12 AM 0000 GMT
#93912: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:14:45 AM 0000 GMT
#93913: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:16:19 AM 0000 GMT
#93914: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:27:37 AM 0000 GMT
#93915: Re: [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:32:12 AM 0000 GMT
#93916: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:39:32 AM 0000 GMT
#93917: [LAW] EASI drivers disable VST instruments Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:42:22 AM 0000 GMT
#93918: Re: [LUG] (LUG) GEN:Dual monitors Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:42:14 AM 0000 GMT
#93919: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:43:52 AM 0000 GMT
#93920: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: Recommendations for FireWire Hard Drive Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:45:45 AM 0000 GMT
#93921: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:47:52 AM 0000 GMT
#93922: RE: [LUG] why is Bounce a real-time function? Crap on Folks.... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:55:42 AM 0000 GMT
#93923: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 3:02:05 AM 0000 GMT
#93924: Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 3:05:49 AM 0000 GMT
#93925: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 3:10:19 AM 0000 GMT
#93926: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 3:11:02 AM 0000 GMT
#93927: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 3:30:19 AM 0000 GMT
#93928: [LUG] Re: [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:04:17 AM 0000 GMT
#93929: Re: [LAWP] Backups anyone? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:05:17 AM 0000 GMT
#93930: Re: [LUG] LOGIC CONTROL ! a Joke ? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:19:46 AM 0000 GMT
#93931: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAMP]Can Logic record in AIFF Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:39:39 AM 0000 GMT
#93932: Re: [LUG] [OT] "Psycho" Acoustics - Super Audio CD vs DVD-Audio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 9:42:37 AM 0000 GMT
#93933: Re: [LAM]450MP vs.800MP vs. godzilla Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:20:16 AM 0000 GMT
#93934: Re: LAMP: Do older ibooks/pb's work with logic? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:20:17 AM 0000 GMT
#93935: LAM: Help, master object in Track mixer Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:38:39 AM 0000 GMT
#93936: Re: [LAW] EASI drivers disable VST instruments Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:56:56 AM 0000 GMT
#93937: Re: [LUG] LOGIC CONTROL ! a Joke ? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:06:58 AM 0000 GMT
#93938: Re: LAM: Help, master object in Track mixer Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:17:58 AM 0000 GMT
#93939: Re: [LUG] MIDI with MT4 in OS X... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:37:22 AM 0000 GMT
#93940: Re: [LUG] Anyboy getting LOGIC 5 or LOGIC control on his/her Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:41:34 AM 0000 GMT
#93941: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:04:58 PM 0000 GMT
#93942: VERY OT: FINAL CUT PRO 3 USERS arround ? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:08:21 PM 0000 GMT
#93943: Re: [LUG] Anyboy getting LOGIC 5 or LOGIC control on his/her hand? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:14:28 PM 0000 GMT
#93944: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:16:05 PM 0000 GMT
#93945: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:25:58 PM 0000 GMT
#93946: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:31:23 PM 0000 GMT
#93947: Re: LOGIC CONTROL ! a Joke ? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:39:40 PM 0000 GMT
#93948: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:42:14 PM 0000 GMT
#93949: Re: [LUG] [OT] "Psycho" Acoustics - Super Audio CD vs DVD-Audio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:56:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93950: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:03:02 PM 0000 GMT
#93951: Re: [LUG] LOGIC CONTROL ! a Joke ? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:10:59 PM 0000 GMT
#93952: [LUG] Re: [LAW]:Windows XP and Unitor8... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:20:08 PM 0000 GMT
#93953: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:20:51 PM 0000 GMT
#93954: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:27:51 PM 0000 GMT
#93955: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:31:56 PM 0000 GMT
#93956: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:34:20 PM 0000 GMT
#93957: [LAMP] Using Drag&drop with Midifiles problem (?) Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:52:39 PM 0000 GMT
#93958: Re: [LUG] [OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:50:07 PM 0000 GMT
#93959: Re: [LUG] Digest Number 4171 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:53:39 PM 0000 GMT
#93960: RE: [LUG] Digest Number 4171 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 1:54:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93961: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:01:03 PM 0000 GMT
#93962: Re: [LUG] Digest Number 4171 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:07:43 PM 0000 GMT
#93963: Re: [LUG] [OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 2:48:17 PM 0000 GMT
#93964: [OT] "Psycho" Acoustics - Super Audio CD vs DVD-Audio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 3:07:53 PM 0000 GMT
#93965: [LAM] armed track has too much reverb on punch-in record mode Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:01:58 PM 0000 GMT
#93966: Re: [LUG] [LAM] armed track has too much reverb on punch-in record mode Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:14:35 PM 0000 GMT
#93967: Re: [LUG] [LAW] EASI drivers disable VST instruments Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:23:53 PM 0000 GMT
#93968: LAMP - autoload locking... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:28:07 PM 0000 GMT
#93969: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:37:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93970: Can I get what I want out of which new Mac? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:35:40 PM 0000 GMT
#93971: Re: [LUG] [OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:42:38 PM 0000 GMT
#93972: [GEN]: Patchchange of es1, evp88 in the arrangewindow Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:49:48 AM 0000 GMT
#93973: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:31:53 PM 0000 GMT
#93974: [LAW] Environment Layer for Korg EM1? Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 9:31:58 PM 0000 GMT
#93975: Re: [LUG] LAMP: Powercore latency Sat, 2 Feb 2002 at 11:19:30 PM 0000 GMT
#93976: [LAM]: either Logic or OMS not recognizing MIDI In Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 12:36:42 AM 0000 GMT
#93977: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:49:56 PM 0000 GMT
#93978: Re: LAMP - autoload locking... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:54:37 PM 0000 GMT
#93979: Re: [LUG] [GEN]: Patchchange of es1, evp88 in the arrangewindow Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:00:31 PM 0000 GMT
#93980: Re: [LUG] Re: LAMP: Do older ibooks/pb's work with logic? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 4:57:57 PM 0000 GMT
#93981: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use within Logic Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:04:20 PM 0000 GMT
#93982: Re: [LUG] [GEN]: Patchchange of es1, evp88 in the arrangewindow Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:03:10 PM 0000 GMT
#93983: Re: [LUG] LAM: Logic & MOTU2408 S/PDIF I/O: Where? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:09:02 PM 0000 GMT
#93984: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use within Logic Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:09:55 PM 0000 GMT
#93985: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use within Logic Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:19:10 PM 0000 GMT
#93986: Re: [LUG] Re: LAMP - autoload locking... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:20:04 PM 0000 GMT
#93987: File - admin.txt Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:26:19 PM 0000 GMT
#93988: [LUG] Re: LAMP - autoload locking... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:28:54 PM 0000 GMT
#93989: Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:02:30 PM 0000 GMT
#93990: Re: [LUG] [LAM] armed track has too much reverb on punch-in record mode Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:49:09 PM 0000 GMT
#93991: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: either Logic or OMS not recognizing MIDI In Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 5:57:37 PM 0000 GMT
#93992: [GEN]Punch-in record and listening to the previously recorded Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:21:25 PM 0000 GMT
#93993: Re: [LUG] [GEN]Punch-in record and listening to the previously recorded material on the same track Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:34:43 PM 0000 GMT
#93994: AW: [LUG] [GEN]Punch-in record and listening to the previously recorded material on the same track Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:31:35 PM 0000 GMT
#93995: GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:46:35 PM 0000 GMT
#93996: AW: [LUG] [LAM] armed track has too much reverb on punch-in record mode Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:48:45 PM 0000 GMT
#93997: Re: [OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - Piracy Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:48:50 PM 0000 GMT
#93998: AW: [LUG] GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:58:18 PM 0000 GMT
#93999: Re: [LUG] [LAM] armed track has too much reverb on punch-in record mode Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:02:19 PM 0000 GMT
#94000: [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:47:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94001: RE: [LUG] [OT] "Psycho" Acoustics - Super Audio CD vs DVD-Audio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:07:29 PM 0000 GMT
#94002: Vst Sytem link / Logic release date Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:13:53 PM 0000 GMT
#94003: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:26:04 PM 0000 GMT
#94004: [LAW2000P] Tip: Low latency with MotU 2408 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:28:27 PM 0000 GMT
#94005: Re: [LUG] [GEN]: Patchchange of es1, evp88 in the arrangewindow Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:31:04 PM 0000 GMT
#94006: RE: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:32:18 PM 0000 GMT
#94007: Re: [LUG] Vst Sytem link / Logic release date Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:35:57 PM 0000 GMT
#94008: Re: [LUG] GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:44:17 PM 0000 GMT
#94009: Re: [LUG] GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:56:28 PM 0000 GMT
#94010: [LAMP}Digi 001 and 01V and optical/spdif? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:16:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94011: RE: [LUG] [LAW2000P] Tip: Low latency with MotU 2408 (and Matrox G400) Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:14:54 PM 0000 GMT
#94012: [LAMP] pc to mac logic conversion blankregions? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:19:29 PM 0000 GMT
#94013: Re: [LUG] [OT] "Psycho" Acoustics - Super Audio CD vs DVD-Audio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:27:19 PM 0000 GMT
#94014: Re: GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:32:42 PM 0000 GMT
#94015: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:42:17 PM 0000 GMT
#94016: Re: [LUG] GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:57:51 PM 0000 GMT
#94017: [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:53:41 PM 0000 GMT
#94018: Re: [LUG] GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 6:57:28 PM 0000 GMT
#94019: RE: [LUG] Re: GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:50:53 PM 0000 GMT
#94020: [LUG] GEN Move multiple faders simultaneously Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 7:13:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94021: Re: [LUG] [LAW2000P] Tip: Low latency with MotU 2408 (and Matrox G400) Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:44:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94022: Re: [LUG] Re: OT: How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:54:46 PM 0000 GMT
#94023: Re: LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 9:11:42 AM 0000 GMT
#94024: RE: [LUG] [LAW2000P] Tip: Low latency with MotU 2408 (and Matrox G400) Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 9:23:10 PM 0000 GMT
#94025: RE: GEN: USB micro hubs Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 9:28:36 AM 0000 GMT
#94026: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 9:36:07 PM 0000 GMT
#94027: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:22:23 PM 0000 GMT
#94028: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:22:31 PM 0000 GMT
#94029: Re: [LAM]450MP vs.800MP vs. godzilla Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:26:03 PM 0000 GMT
#94030: Re: [LAM]450MP vs.800MP vs. godzilla Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:47:31 PM 0000 GMT
#94031: LAMP - Learning to master with my MOTU 896 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:16:07 PM 0000 GMT
#94032: Re: [LUG] Re: Re: Dual G4/1 Ghz PowerMacs... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:20:42 PM 0000 GMT
#94033: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:06:13 PM 0000 GMT
#94034: Re: [LUG] [GEN]Punch-in record and listening to the previously recorded material on the same track Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:27:44 PM 0000 GMT
#94035: Re: [LAM]450MP vs.800MP vs. godzilla Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:34:01 PM 0000 GMT
#94036: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:20:02 AM 0000 GMT
#94037: Re: [LUG] LAMP - Learning to master with my MOTU 896 Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:34:10 PM 0000 GMT
#94038: Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:32:55 AM 0000 GMT
#94039: LAMS: Latency get shorter after Re-Boot Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:44:33 AM 0000 GMT
#94040: [LAW2000P] Problem with Sonic Foundry plugs Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:48:01 AM 0000 GMT
#94041: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 8:54:16 PM 0000 GMT
#94042: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 9:27:24 PM 0000 GMT
#94043: Re: [LUG] [LAW2000P] Tip: Low latency with MotU 2408 (and Matrox G400) Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 9:29:54 PM 0000 GMT
#94044: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: either Logic or OMS not recognizing MIDI In Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 10:30:27 PM 0000 GMT
#94045: Re: [LUG] Importing Audio from another studio Sun, 3 Feb 2002 at 11:57:44 PM 0000 GMT
#94046: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:37:16 AM 0000 GMT
#94047: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:46:32 AM 0000 GMT
#94048: Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:30:18 AM 0000 GMT
#94049: [LUG][OT] Dogma (was LAMP 5.0 Dongle question) Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:39:54 AM 0000 GMT
#94050: Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:56:40 AM 0000 GMT
#94051: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:05:57 AM 0000 GMT
#94052: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:23:25 AM 0000 GMT
#94053: LAW: Need another Motherboard Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:27:07 AM 0000 GMT
#94054: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:29:10 AM 0000 GMT
#94055: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:55:42 AM 0000 GMT
#94056: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:00:01 AM 0000 GMT
#94057: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use within Logic Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:06:11 AM 0000 GMT
#94058: Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:49:41 AM 0000 GMT
#94059: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:55:48 AM 0000 GMT
#94060: Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:58:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94061: Re: LAMP - Learning to master with my MOTU 896 Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:01:55 AM 0000 GMT
#94062: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:18:03 AM 0000 GMT
#94063: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:46:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94064: Re: [LAWP] Backups anyone? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:56:48 AM 0000 GMT
#94065: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Environment Layer for Korg EM1? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 1:59:54 PM 0000 GMT
#94066: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:58:17 AM 0000 GMT
#94067: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:10:10 AM 0000 GMT
#94068: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:11:41 AM 0000 GMT
#94069: Re: [LUG] [LAMP}Digi 001 and 01V and optical/spdif? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:16:10 AM 0000 GMT
#94070: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:23:09 AM 0000 GMT
#94071: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:29:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94072: [LUG] Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:37:47 AM 0000 GMT
#94073: Re: [LUG] LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:40:27 AM 0000 GMT
#94074: Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay for TDM) Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:18:46 AM 0000 GMT
#94075: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:18:22 AM 0000 GMT
#94076: Re: [LAWP] Backups anyone? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:25:34 AM 0000 GMT
#94077: Re: [LUG] OT: New MOTU 828/896 Driver (v2.1) Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:33:09 AM 0000 GMT
#94078: LAWP: What is best way to transport EXS24 instruments? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:55:53 AM 0000 GMT
#94079: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:27:49 AM 0000 GMT
#94080: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:29:19 AM 0000 GMT
#94081: Re: [LUG] LAWP: What is best way to transport EXS24 instruments? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:30:37 AM 0000 GMT
#94082: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use within Logic Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:26:26 PM 0000 GMT
#94083: [OT] Psychoacoustics Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 1:46:19 PM 0000 GMT
#94084: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:46:31 PM 0000 GMT
#94085: [OT] How to dig out a buried snare from a mix?? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 1:54:39 PM 0000 GMT
#94086: AW: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use within Logic Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:54:57 PM 0000 GMT
#94087: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 1:45:46 PM 0000 GMT
#94088: Re: [LUG] Re: SMP in OS X Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 1:45:58 PM 0000 GMT
#94089: Re: [LUG] [GEN]: Patchchange of es1, evp88 in the arrangewindow Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 1:58:47 PM 0000 GMT
#94090: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:14:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94091: RE: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:15:58 PM 0000 GMT
#94092: LAMP - Mute individual events in Matrix ? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 1:23:35 AM 0000 GMT
#94093: [GEN] environment transform question Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:00:39 AM 0000 GMT
#94094: [LAM] : Mac G4 Titanium Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:03:24 AM 0000 GMT
#94095: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:22:02 PM 0000 GMT
#94096: GEN: sync: rewire slave mode / logic & ableton Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:01:05 PM 0000 GMT
#94097: Re: [LAW] Echo(Event) Mia experience Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 12:27:41 PM 0000 GMT
#94098: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:24:53 PM 0000 GMT
#94099: GEN Logic SoundTrack 24 Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:25:05 PM 0000 GMT
#94100: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:28:58 PM 0000 GMT
#94101: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:32:33 PM 0000 GMT
#94102: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:40:04 PM 0000 GMT
#94103: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:46:22 PM 0000 GMT
#94104: Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:47:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94105: Re: [LUG] [GEN] environment transform question Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:55:10 PM 0000 GMT
#94106: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:55:40 PM 0000 GMT
#94107: Re:LAMP - Learning to master with my MOTU 896 Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:03:26 PM 0000 GMT
#94108: Logic 5.0...RELEASE DATE..."Late January" Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:57:05 PM 0000 GMT
#94109: Re: [LUG] [LAM]: either Logic or OMS not recognizing MIDI In Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:55:40 PM 0000 GMT
#94110: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:03:15 PM 0000 GMT
#94111: Re: Logic 5.0...RELEASE DATE..."It's a secret" Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:12:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94112: Re: [LUG] [OT] Psychoacoustics Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:13:02 PM 0000 GMT
#94113: Re: Logic 5.0...RELEASE DATE..."Late January" Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:08:40 PM 0000 GMT
#94114: RE: [LUG] Digest Number 4179 Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:20:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94115: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:26:02 PM 0000 GMT
#94116: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:36:02 PM 0000 GMT
#94117: [GEN] Re: environment transform question Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:36:09 PM 0000 GMT
#94118: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:33:18 PM 0000 GMT
#94119: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:48:34 PM 0000 GMT
#94120: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:51:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94121: [LUG] Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:01:48 PM 0000 GMT
#94122: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for usewithin Logic Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:08:35 PM 0000 GMT
#94123: Emagic Site Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:12:39 PM 0000 GMT
#94124: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Re: environment transform question Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 3:59:36 PM 0000 GMT
#94125: Re: [LUG] Emagic Site Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:16:49 PM 0000 GMT
#94126: Re: [LUG] LAMP - Mute individual events in Matrix ? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:14:04 PM 0000 GMT
#94127: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:25:49 PM 0000 GMT
#94128: GEN: Logic 5.0 is shipping Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:42:21 PM 0000 GMT
#94129: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:47:21 PM 0000 GMT
#94130: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:54:21 PM 0000 GMT
#94131: RE: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:11:33 PM 0000 GMT
#94132: Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:11:39 PM 0000 GMT
#94133: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:22:37 PM 0000 GMT
#94134: [LUG] [LAM] environment import Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:32:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94135: Re: [LUG] [LAM] environment import Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:43:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94136: Re: [LUG] [LAM] environment import Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:44:16 PM 0000 GMT
#94137: LAMP MP performance Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:44:26 PM 0000 GMT
#94138: [LAW] ASIO overload / Periodic (6-7 secs) performance peaks Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:48:28 PM 0000 GMT
#94139: Re: [LUG] [LAM] environment import Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:49:42 PM 0000 GMT
#94140: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:04:38 PM 0000 GMT
#94141: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 4:29:56 PM 0000 GMT
#94142: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:25:48 PM 0000 GMT
#94143: RE: [LUG] [LAM] environment import Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:55:37 PM 0000 GMT
#94144: RE: [LUG] [LAM] environment import Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:48:17 PM 0000 GMT
#94145: OT: Is Matrox better than Radeon? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:51:21 PM 0000 GMT
#94146: Re: OT: Is Matrox better than Radeon? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:11:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94147: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:30:59 PM 0000 GMT
#94148: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 6:14:33 PM 0000 GMT
#94149: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:47:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94150: Re: [LUG][OT] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:02:26 PM 0000 GMT
#94151: Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:10:25 PM 0000 GMT
#94152: GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:30:41 PM 0000 GMT
#94153: RE: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:21:26 PM 0000 GMT
#94154: Re: OT: DS2416 : the new 4.0b driver is worth a look ! Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:44:59 PM 0000 GMT
#94155: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:55:58 PM 0000 GMT
#94156: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:06:57 PM 0000 GMT
#94157: OT: Is Matrox better than Radeon? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:15:15 PM 0000 GMT
#94158: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:38:39 PM 0000 GMT
#94159: [GEN]:Sample edit window Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:42:29 PM 0000 GMT
#94160: Re: [LUG] [LAW] ASIO overload / Periodic (6-7 secs) Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:46:00 PM 0000 GMT
#94161: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:46:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94162: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:21:06 PM 0000 GMT
#94163: Re: [LUG] [LAM] : Mac G4 Titanium Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:33:08 PM 0000 GMT
#94164: RE: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:41:26 PM 0000 GMT
#94165: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:34:52 PM 0000 GMT
#94166: Re: [LUG] [GEN]:Sample edit window Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:42:58 PM 0000 GMT
#94167: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:44:45 PM 0000 GMT
#94168: Re: [LUG] [GEN]:Sample edit window Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:47:49 PM 0000 GMT
#94169: RE: [LUG] [LAW] Logic Audio and Dual Processor PC Support (the o Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:52:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94170: Re: [GEN]:Sample edit window Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:52:50 PM 0000 GMT
#94171: Re: [LUG] Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:55:49 PM 0000 GMT
#94172: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:54:41 PM 0000 GMT
#94173: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:57:28 PM 0000 GMT
#94174: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:56:40 PM 0000 GMT
#94175: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:00:19 PM 0000 GMT
#94176: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:59:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94177: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:02:47 PM 0000 GMT
#94178: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:04:34 PM 0000 GMT
#94179: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:15:47 PM 0000 GMT
#94180: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:16:47 PM 0000 GMT
#94181: Re: [LUG] Digest Number 4182 Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:15:56 PM 0000 GMT
#94182: Re: [LUG] [LAW]4.8 Plugin automation.... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:24:34 PM 0000 GMT
#94183: Re: [LUG] [LAW] ASIO overload / Periodic (6-7 secs) performance peaks Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:24:01 PM 0000 GMT
#94184: Re: RME stuff Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:26:13 PM 0000 GMT
#94185: RE: [LUG] [LAW] Audio track settings -> Save/load/paste... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:38:32 PM 0000 GMT
#94186: [Gen]: Pencil tool behaviour in the environment Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 2:38:33 PM 0000 GMT
#94187: LAM/LAW: VST-Link... Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:15:23 PM 0000 GMT
#94188: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 5:56:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94189: Re: [LUG] Re: OT: Is Matrox better than Radeon? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 7:27:46 PM 0000 GMT
#94190: [law] es1 exs24 etc. HELP! Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:04:29 PM 0000 GMT
#94191: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 9:02:20 PM 0000 GMT
#94192: [lug][ot] dual monitor card for mac? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 8:52:23 PM 0000 GMT
#94193: Re: [LUG] [LAW] Environment Layer for Korg EM1? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 10:53:57 PM 0000 GMT
#94194: LAM: Dual processor vs. Hammerfall or TC Powercore? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:35:20 PM 0000 GMT
#94195: Re: [LUG] Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay for TDM) Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:40:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94196: Re: [LUG] Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay for TDM) Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:50:39 PM 0000 GMT
#94197: Re: LAMP with RME interfaces Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:53:04 PM 0000 GMT
#94198: Re: RME stuff Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:53:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94199: Re: [LUG] LAM: Dual processor vs. Hammerfall or TC Powercore? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:58:35 PM 0000 GMT
#94200: RE: GEN: Who uses markers? / workflow. Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:59:28 PM 0000 GMT
#94201: GEN: Who uses markers? Mon, 4 Feb 2002 at 11:59:28 PM 0000 GMT
#94202: Re: [LUG] Re: RME stuff Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:01:25 AM 0000 GMT
#94203: Re: [LUG] LAM/LAW: VST-Link... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:13:51 AM 0000 GMT
#94204: LAMP - 896 Audio cutting out on all buffer settings Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:15:21 AM 0000 GMT
#94205: GEN: SBuilding A Giga Studio Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:07:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94206: Re: [LUG] [Gen]: Pencil tool behaviour in the environment Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:18:41 AM 0000 GMT
#94207: Re: [LUG] [Gen]: Pencil tool behaviour in the environment Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:24:36 AM 0000 GMT
#94208: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:27:37 AM 0000 GMT
#94209: LAW: Anyone have a P4 with RDRAM and a Hammerfall working ok? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:31:36 AM 0000 GMT
#94210: GEN: CDRW where to install? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:35:47 AM 0000 GMT
#94211: LAMS: System performance tuning? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:38:30 AM 0000 GMT
#94212: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:38:48 AM 0000 GMT
#94213: Re: GEN: SBuilding A Giga Studio Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:41:30 AM 0000 GMT
#94214: RE: [LUG] RE: GEN: Who uses markers? / workflow. Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:44:26 AM 0000 GMT
#94215: RE: [LUG] [Gen]: Pencil tool behaviour in the environment Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:50:35 AM 0000 GMT
#94216: GEN: Can Touch Tracks play midi via audio instruments? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:41:51 AM 0000 GMT
#94217: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:54:33 AM 0000 GMT
#94218: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:54:45 AM 0000 GMT
#94219: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:01:37 AM 0000 GMT
#94220: RE: [LUG] Re: OT: Is Matrox better than Radeon? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:10:51 AM 0000 GMT
#94221: Re: Re: LAMP - autoload locking... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:12:39 AM 0000 GMT
#94222: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:08:45 AM 0000 GMT
#94223: [LAM]/[OT] Emagic MIDI interfaces in OS X... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:15:02 AM 0000 GMT
#94224: LAWP-Mixer Automation Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:29:42 AM 0000 GMT
#94225: RE: [LUG] LAWP-Mixer Automation Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:39:21 AM 0000 GMT
#94226: Re: LAMS: System performance tuning? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:41:19 AM 0000 GMT
#94227: Re: [LUG] Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:46:33 AM 0000 GMT
#94228: Re: [LUG] LAWP-Mixer Automation Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:48:04 AM 0000 GMT
#94229: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:54:21 AM 0000 GMT
#94230: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:04:43 AM 0000 GMT
#94231: Re: [LAWP] Backups anyone? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:32:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94232: RE: [LUG] [LAW2000P] Problem with Sonic Foundry plugs Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:39:46 AM 0000 GMT
#94233: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:45:21 AM 0000 GMT
#94234: Re: [LUG] Re: GEN: SBuilding A Giga Studio Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:38:00 AM 0000 GMT
#94235: [LAWP] Reason & UAD-1 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:52:30 AM 0000 GMT
#94236: Re: [LUG] Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay for TDM) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:53:48 AM 0000 GMT
#94237: Re: [LUG] Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:02:36 AM 0000 GMT
#94238: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAWP] Backups anyone? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:26:31 AM 0000 GMT
#94239: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:40:07 AM 0000 GMT
#94240: Re: LAM: Dual processor vs. Hammerfall or TC Powercore? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:43:21 AM 0000 GMT
#94241: Re: [LUG] LAWP-Mixer Automation Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:49:41 AM 0000 GMT
#94242: Environment Objects Ideas Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:06:59 AM 0000 GMT
#94243: Re: [LAW] Virtual (like Hubi's loopback) midi for Win XP/2000 ? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:07:50 AM 0000 GMT
#94244: Digi 001 Latency: OK for softsynth monitoring? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:27:06 AM 0000 GMT
#94245: Re: [LUG] Environment Objects Ideas Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:28:35 AM 0000 GMT
#94246: [LAWP] VIA KT266A Chipset MB + MOTU PCI324/24i Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:48:28 AM 0000 GMT
#94247: Re: LAMP Computer stops mid-bounce Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:10:43 AM 0000 GMT
#94248: RE: [LUG] Re: Logic 5.0...RELEASE DATE..."Late January" Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:25:16 AM 0000 GMT
#94249: SV: [LUG] [LAW2000P] Problem with Sonic Foundry plugs Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:20:14 AM 0000 GMT
#94250: LAMP: Track sounds strange ... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:31:39 AM 0000 GMT
#94251: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:38:50 AM 0000 GMT
#94252: Re: [LUG] [LAMP] Midi dropping out w/OMS Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:43:54 AM 0000 GMT
#94253: [LAM] getting 4?? tracks max... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:43:37 AM 0000 GMT
#94254: Re: LAP: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:53:32 AM 0000 GMT
#94255: Re: [LUG] [LAW] ASIO overload / Periodic (6-7 secs) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:00:11 AM 0000 GMT
#94256: Re: [LUG] Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:04:39 AM 0000 GMT
#94257: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:07:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94258: Re: [LUG] [LAM] getting 4?? tracks max... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:06:43 AM 0000 GMT
#94259: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:57:53 AM 0000 GMT
#94260: Re: [LUG] [LAM]/[OT] Emagic MIDI interfaces in OS X... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 7:59:25 AM 0000 GMT
#94261: Re: [LUG] Gen-Cycle Record not working Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:18:15 AM 0000 GMT
#94262: Re: [LUG] LAMP - autoload locking... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:23:39 AM 0000 GMT
#94263: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:34:12 AM 0000 GMT
#94264: RME listserv or newsgroup? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:41:03 AM 0000 GMT
#94265: Re: [LUG] LAM: Dual processor vs. Hammerfall or TC Powercore? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:42:18 AM 0000 GMT
#94266: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:52:08 AM 0000 GMT
#94267: Re: [LUG] RME listserv or newsgroup? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:56:00 AM 0000 GMT
#94268: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 8:57:56 AM 0000 GMT
#94269: Re: [LAM] Re: Time (machine?) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 9:28:20 AM 0000 GMT
#94270: [LAM] Re: Time (machine?) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 9:36:47 AM 0000 GMT
#94271: Re: [LUG] Environment Objects Ideas Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 9:50:40 AM 0000 GMT
#94272: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 9:54:44 AM 0000 GMT
#94273: [LAMP] MOTU 828 output muting - anyone else had this? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:06:51 AM 0000 GMT
#94274: [GEN] inopportune sample loading at startup Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:18:22 AM 0000 GMT
#94275: Re: [LUG] LAMP 5.0 Dongle question - authorising multiple copies Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:15:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94276: Re: [LUG] [GEN] inopportune sample loading at startup Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:26:02 AM 0000 GMT
#94277: Re: [LUG] [GEN] inopportune sample loading at startup Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:27:51 AM 0000 GMT
#94278: RE: [LUG] [law] es1 exs24 etc. HELP! Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:34:09 AM 0000 GMT
#94279: RE: [LUG] GEN: SBuilding A Giga Studio Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:34:10 AM 0000 GMT
#94280: Re: [LUG] GEN: SBuilding A Giga Studio Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:46:54 AM 0000 GMT
#94281: RE: Gen-Cycle Record not working Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 10:49:59 AM 0000 GMT
#94282: LAMP-midi for Voice Machine (again!!!!) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:03:59 AM 0000 GMT
#94283: Re: [LUG] LAMP-midi for Voice Machine (again!!!!) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:12:38 AM 0000 GMT
#94284: Re: [OT] Psychoacoustics Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:41:03 PM 0000 GMT
#94285: GEN Gigastudio,Hamerfall,WinXP Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:54:46 AM 0000 GMT
#94286: Re: Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:59:33 AM 0000 GMT
#94287: RE: [LUG] GEN Gigastudio,Hamerfall,WinXP Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:56:05 AM 0000 GMT
#94288: Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:03:34 PM 0000 GMT
#94289: Re: [LUG] LAP 5.0 full specs questions Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:07:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94290: Re: [LUG] [LAW2000P] Problem with Sonic Foundry plugs Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:14:26 PM 0000 GMT
#94291: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:11:17 PM 0000 GMT
#94292: Re: [LUG] [LAW] ASIO overload / Periodic (6-7 secs) performance peaks Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:23:57 PM 0000 GMT
#94293: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:26:29 PM 0000 GMT
#94294: Re: [LUG] LAP 5.0 full specs questions Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:29:37 PM 0000 GMT
#94295: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:32:01 PM 0000 GMT
#94296: RE: [LUG] Re: [LAWP] Backups anyone? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:27:38 PM 0000 GMT
#94297: [LUG] GEN: Off and Running. V5.0 shipping now. Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:29:19 PM 0000 GMT
#94298: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:36:28 AM 0000 GMT
#94299: Re: [OT] Psychoacoustics Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:48:41 PM 0000 GMT
#94300: Re: LAM/LAW :VST-link... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:49:23 PM 0000 GMT
#94301: Re: [LUG] GEN: Off and Running. V5.0 shipping now. Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:03:33 PM 0000 GMT
#94302: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:05:46 PM 0000 GMT
#94303: LAW: Program change bug in 4.8.1? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:11:00 PM 0000 GMT
#94304: WAS GEN: SBuilding A Giga Studio now OT Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:15:19 PM 0000 GMT
#94305: Re: [LUG] Re: [LAW] Virtual (like Hubi's loopback) midi for Win XP/2000 ? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:19:06 PM 0000 GMT
#94306: Re: [LUG] Swiftkick environment toolkit (attn Len Sasso) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:20:57 PM 0000 GMT
#94307: Re: [LUG] RME listserv or newsgroup? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:21:56 PM 0000 GMT
#94308: Re: [LUG] GEN Gigastudio,Hamerfall,WinXP Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:25:12 PM 0000 GMT
#94309: Re: [LUG] RME listserv or newsgroup? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:38:16 PM 0000 GMT
#94310: Re: GEN Gigastudio,Hamerfall,WinXP Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:40:17 PM 0000 GMT
#94311: [LUG] Re:[LAMP] 5.0 and d8b jog wheel Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:55:00 PM 0000 GMT
#94312: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:00:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94313: Re: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:02:41 PM 0000 GMT
#94314: Re: LAMP: Track sounds strange ... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:04:33 PM 0000 GMT
#94315: Re: [LUG] Environment Objects Ideas Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:22:46 PM 0000 GMT
#94316: RE: [LUG] GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:17:00 PM 0000 GMT
#94317: [LAMP] MOTU 828 output muting - anyone else had this? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:22:12 PM 0000 GMT
#94318: RE: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:28:36 PM 0000 GMT
#94319: Re: [LAMP] MOTU 828 output muting - anyone else had this? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:43:35 PM 0000 GMT
#94320: Re: [LUG] Gen: RME Hammerfall DSP (was: Why people 'still' pay for TDM) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:57:29 PM 0000 GMT
#94321: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:59:14 PM 0000 GMT
#94322: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:01:40 PM 0000 GMT
#94323: Re: [LUG] [LAM]/[OT] Emagic MIDI interfaces in OS X... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:01:46 PM 0000 GMT
#94324: GEN: RDRAM VS DDR. What do you think? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:10:17 AM 0000 GMT
#94325: [LAW] Un-clicking my otherwise perfect takes... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:10:04 AM 0000 GMT
#94326: RE: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:11:34 PM 0000 GMT
#94327: [GEN] Logic Audio Gold 5.0 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:38:52 PM 0000 GMT
#94328: [LAW] OT:MSI 645 Ultra333 (sis645 chipset) motherboard? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 2:15:48 PM 0000 GMT
#94329: Re: [LUG] LAMG: Audiowerk error 01 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 12:49:11 PM 0000 GMT
#94330: RE: [LUG] [LAWP] VIA KT266A Chipset MB + MOTU PCI324/24i Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 6:04:17 AM 0000 GMT
#94331: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:58:11 AM 0000 GMT
#94332: RE: [LUG] Re: [LAW] Virtual (like Hubi's loopback) midi for Win XP/2000 ? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 6:10:23 AM 0000 GMT
#94333: Re: Why people 'still' pay for TDM h/ware for use within Logic Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:36:30 AM 0000 GMT
#94334: Re:LAMP with RME Interfaces Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 11:36:34 AM 0000 GMT
#94335: Re: [LAMP] MOTU 828 output muting - anyone else had this? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 1:16:29 PM 0000 GMT
#94336: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Logic Audio Gold 5.0 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:15:58 PM 0000 GMT
#94337: RE: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:28:18 PM 0000 GMT
#94338: Re: [LUG] [LAM]/[OT] Emagic MIDI interfaces in OS X... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 3:55:35 PM 0000 GMT
#94339: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Logic Audio Gold 5.0 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:03:16 PM 0000 GMT
#94340: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:04:48 PM 0000 GMT
#94341: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Logic Audio Gold 5.0 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:09:00 PM 0000 GMT
#94342: Re: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:08:37 PM 0000 GMT
#94343: Re: [LUG] RE: Gen-Cycle Record not working Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:12:03 PM 0000 GMT
#94344: LAW: Bounce mono-track from EXS24 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:24:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94345: Antw: [LUG] [GEN] Logic Audio Gold 5.0 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:27:23 PM 0000 GMT
#94346: Re: [LUG][OT] GEN: Logic 5.0 is shipping Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:28:22 PM 0000 GMT
#94347: Re: GEN: Who uses markers? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:35:18 PM 0000 GMT
#94348: [GEN] I'm back, and the shop is OPEN! Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:34:51 PM 0000 GMT
#94349: Re: [LUG] [GEN] Logic Audio Gold 5.0 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:37:05 PM 0000 GMT
#94350: RE: [LUG] Re: Why people 'still' use Pro Tools Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:53:43 PM 0000 GMT
#94351: Re: [LUG] RE: GEN: Who uses markers? / workflow. Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:54:24 PM 0000 GMT
#94352: [LUG] GEN: Logic Audio Alexandrite (was Logic Audio Gold 5.0) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:59:58 PM 0000 GMT
#94353: (OT) WaveBurner for Windows Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:09:12 PM 0000 GMT
#94354: Re: [LUG] GEN: SBuilding A Giga Studio Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:55:00 PM 0000 GMT
#94355: RE: [LUG] GEN Gigastudio,Hamerfall,WinXP Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 4:58:38 PM 0000 GMT
#94356: Dare I ask about OS X support in LAG 5? Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:03:24 PM 0000 GMT
#94357: RE: [LUG] [LAM] getting 4?? tracks max... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:03:37 PM 0000 GMT
#94358: RE: Gen-Cycle Record not working Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:08:06 PM 0000 GMT
#94359: RE: [LUG] [LAW] ASIO overload / Periodic (6-7 secs) performance Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:10:28 PM 0000 GMT
#94360: RE: [LUG] [law] es1 exs24 etc. HELP! Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:11:52 PM 0000 GMT
#94361: Re: [LAM]/[OT] Emagic MIDI interfaces in OS X... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:17:18 PM 0000 GMT
#94362: Re: [LAM]/[OT] Emagic MIDI interfaces in OS X... Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:16:46 PM 0000 GMT
#94363: Re: [LUG] GEN: Logic Audio Alexandrite (was Logic Audio Gold 5.0) Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:21:21 PM 0000 GMT
#94364: Re: Antw: [LUG] [GEN] Logic Audio Gold 5.0 Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:24:38 PM 0000 GMT
#94365: Re: [LUG] Re: LAMP Computer stops mid-bounce Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 5:25:06 PM 0000 GMT
#94366: