Hi Nick, Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency compensation of TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to and from TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... Regards Mark Am 30.01.2006 17:45 Uhr schrieb "Nick Batzdorf" unter <recording@earthlink.net>: > From: "shadowboxnyc" <shadowboxnyc@yahoo.com> > > >> The Apple info page doesn't mention RTAS which I assume to mean >> that it won't be >> supported. But it does say ,"Logic Pro 7.2 is fully compatible >> with the Pro Tools 7.1 version >> of DAE. All features are supported..." So maybe that means RTAS >> plugs will be available on >> DAE tracks? >> >> Did anyone see Apple at NAMM and inquire about this? > > RTAS will never be supported in Logic. It's only for the Pro Tools > software. > > > Nick Batzdorf, editor/publisher > Virtual Instruments Magazine - the world of softsynths and samplers > www.Virtualinstrumentsmag.com > 1-877 VImagzn (846-2496) > 818/905-9101, cell 590-9101 -- Mark Ziebarth Mühlenkamp 12 d 22303 Hamburg Telefon: ++494027800926 (Studio) ++491733135456 (mobil) ++494065055216 (Fax)

Is that true?? Sounds like a real stick in the eye for Logic if that's really the case. Any word on whether DP is compatible w/ PT7 yet? --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Mark Ziebarth <mark@a...> wrote: > > Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency compensation of > TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to and from > TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... >

What kind of ESB? AFAIK DP doesn't have anything like ESB. The only native plugs you can run in DP under DAE are RTAS. I assume DP 5 (announced at NAMM) will be PT 7 compatible. On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Erik Huber wrote: > > Is that true?? Sounds like a real stick in the eye for Logic if > that's really the case. > > Any word on whether DP is compatible w/ PT7 yet? > > > --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Mark Ziebarth <mark@a...> wrote: >> >> Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency >> compensation of >> TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to >> and from >> TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... >> > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >

Hi Judson, People who know much more about Digital Performer than me told me, that there is a equivalent to "ESB": one can route native channels to tdm and vice versa (32 mono channels). I can't prove it but believe these persons... Regards Mark Am 30.01.2006 19:45 Uhr schrieb "Judson" unter <motu@judsoncrane.com>: > What kind of ESB? AFAIK DP doesn't have anything like ESB. The > only native plugs you can run in DP under DAE are RTAS. I assume > DP 5 (announced at NAMM) will be PT 7 compatible. > > On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Erik Huber wrote: > >> >> Is that true?? Sounds like a real stick in the eye for Logic if >> that's really the case. >> >> Any word on whether DP is compatible w/ PT7 yet? >> >> >> --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Mark Ziebarth <mark@a...> wrote: >>> >>> Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency >>> compensation of >>> TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to >>> and from >>> TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... -- Mark Ziebarth Mühlenkamp 12 d 22303 Hamburg Telefon: ++494027800926 (Studio) ++491733135456 (mobil) ++494065055216 (Fax)

f-erenc, Did your info come directly from Apple? I've heard different info from a source who works at Digi. I have no idea if it's is accurate, but I thought I'd mention it to see if this matches anything that you've heard. He told me that although HTDM is gone and RTAS/AU will still not work on native tracks, there will be increased integration of the native DTDM and DAE mixers in Logic, possibly with ESB replaced by improved bussing between the two mixers/drivers. Aren't rumors wonderful? - Dave On Jan 30, 2006, at 7:26 AM, f-erenc szabo wrote: > <will@willslater.co.uk> wrote: >> more channels across the NATIVE to DAE bridge would be useful here. > > > Everything is the same (in DAE and DTDM and ESB), minus > the ability to instanicate HTDM plugins on DAE tracks. > > So, Logic 7.2 has some new features to be sure, but none > of them are in the world of DAE/ESB - and in fact there is one > major feature missing (thanks to Digidesign abandoning HTDM). > > So there is no way at all to instanciate any kind of native plugin > on a DAE track in Logic 7.2. Not HTDM. Not RTAS. Not AU. > > And since Logic 7.2 is for Tiger only, it can't be used > with MIX hardware. > > All ProTools6 functionality has been removed from Logic 7.2. > This means that Logic 7.2 requires ProTools 7 to work with > HD hardware via DAE. > > > > > > > > > f-erenc szabo, smarty pants > Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T > "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" > <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat> > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >

Hi Erik, Yes, it's true. I forgot to mention that Digital Performers "ESB" works with 32 mono channels (or 16 stereo) in both directions. But people told me that it's a little bit sophisticated to make "ESB" work. But once it's done... I never tried Digital Performer myself and don't know if the MotU program is PT7 compatible right now. Regards Mark Am 30.01.2006 19:34 Uhr schrieb "Erik Huber" unter <erockerboy@yahoo.com>: > > Is that true?? Sounds like a real stick in the eye for Logic if that's really > the case. > > Any word on whether DP is compatible w/ PT7 yet? > > > --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Mark Ziebarth <mark@a...> wrote: >> >> Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency compensation of >> TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to and from >> TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... -- Mark Ziebarth Mühlenkamp 12 d 22303 Hamburg Telefon: ++494027800926 (Studio) ++491733135456 (mobil) ++494065055216 (Fax)

I have DP, but I hate using it because I just never liked the workflow much. I'll see if I can get around to firing it up tonight and see about this routing, RTAS hoo ha. b On Jan 30, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Mark Ziebarth wrote: > Hi Judson, > People who know much more about Digital Performer than me told me, > that > there is a equivalent to "ESB": one can route native channels to > tdm and > vice versa (32 mono channels). I can't prove it but believe these > persons... > > Regards > > Mark > > > Am 30.01.2006 19:45 Uhr schrieb "Judson" unter <motu@judsoncrane.com>: > >> What kind of ESB? AFAIK DP doesn't have anything like ESB. The >> only native plugs you can run in DP under DAE are RTAS. I assume >> DP 5 (announced at NAMM) will be PT 7 compatible. >> >> On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Erik Huber wrote: >> >>> >>> Is that true?? Sounds like a real stick in the eye for Logic if >>> that's really the case. >>> >>> Any word on whether DP is compatible w/ PT7 yet? >>> >>> >>> --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Mark Ziebarth <mark@a...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency >>>> compensation of >>>> TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to >>>> and from >>>> TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... > > -- > Mark Ziebarth > Mühlenkamp 12 d > 22303 Hamburg > Telefon: > ++494027800926 (Studio) > ++491733135456 (mobil) > ++494065055216 (Fax) > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >

I have a dual 2.5Ghz G5 (refurbished) on it's way from Apple and have a few questions about setting it up: 1. I want to put two 500 gig drives in it. For $337 each, I can get Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM hard drives w/16MB Buffers at http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ThirdCategoryList.jsp?SecondCategoryCode0110 Any problems with these I don't know about? 2. How much RAM? I think Nick has said Logic maxes out for him at 3.5 gigs. So is 4 gig the number I should install? 3. I'm going to go ahead and use the latest Tiger (I'm currently still on Panther.) From posts here, it seems ready for prime time. But I do have a lot of plugins, both effects and soft synths. I assume they're all Tiger ready by now. Is that a good assumption? Or more to the point, is anyone having any problems with a particular plug on Tigetr? 4. Universal track mode. I used to always have it "off." But now I'm reading that it can be either on or off. Correct? 5. DSP/voices settings. During the Logic Setup Assistant routine, it asks how many voices and DSP chips. I'm never sure what to put. One of my rigs is a Digi HD2 (already on a G5 dual 2.5) and the other is HD3 Accel (currently on a G4 and the subject in this post.) When sequencing, I never go over 48 audio tracks or 48 audio instruments, so I don't need to max out that setting. But I don't know why they offer all those combinations of DSPs/voices. For a particular number of voices, you get choices for how many DSP chips. Does it matter what I put, and if so, based on the needs I've described, what should I set it at? 6. Buffer settings. Core audio at 128 samples and TDM buffer at large. These seem to be the preferred settings for us, right? I realize some of these questions are pretty remedial and maybe overly cautious. But this is going to be a massive install and if it's successful, I'm going to swap out the drives and RAM on the first G5 as well. So I want to make sure I'm not making obvious mistakes. Thanks for any help! : ) - Mike Greene

Hi Bob, I confirmed what I said. Maybe the way Digital Performer handles ist "System bridge" isn't obvious but it should work as RTAS and latency compensation for tdm... The workflow is another point. I once tried Digital Performer a few years ago and didn't like it. As you... I don't want people to switch over to Digital Performer but Logic to be the best TDM-Host... Regards Mark Am 30.01.2006 20:04 Uhr schrieb "Bob DeMaa" unter <bobdemaa@mac.com>: > I have DP, but I hate using it because I just never liked the > workflow much. > > I'll see if I can get around to firing it up tonight and see about > this routing, RTAS hoo ha. > > b > > -- Mark Ziebarth Mühlenkamp 12 d 22303 Hamburg Telefon: ++494027800926 (Studio) ++491733135456 (mobil) ++494065055216 (Fax)

Oh I agree totally. I'd sooner switch to Cubase SX3 than go to DP. I'm considering just going native with Logic, Possibly at the end of this year, or maybe into 2007. We'll see how well the new Apogee interfaces go and how low the latency is. It's too bad the DIgi Core drivers are so poorly written. I was ready to pull my hair out on a recent mix using the Digi Core drivers only. It was almost impossible to record anything without pops in it. The only problem really is that if I go Native, it will mainly be for writing, I'll still need the Digi HD system for mixing. especially considering the investment I've got in plug-ins and hardware. blah blah blah, we'll see how the year goes. b On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Mark Ziebarth wrote: > Hi Bob, > I confirmed what I said. Maybe the way Digital Performer handles > ist "System > bridge" isn't obvious but it should work as RTAS and latency > compensation > for tdm... > The workflow is another point. I once tried Digital Performer a few > years > ago and didn't like it. As you... > I don't want people to switch over to Digital Performer but Logic > to be the > best TDM-Host... > > Regards > > Mark > > > Am 30.01.2006 20:04 Uhr schrieb "Bob DeMaa" unter <bobdemaa@mac.com>: > >> I have DP, but I hate using it because I just never liked the >> workflow much. >> >> I'll see if I can get around to firing it up tonight and see about >> this routing, RTAS hoo ha. >> >> b >> >> > > -- > Mark Ziebarth > Mühlenkamp 12 d > 22303 Hamburg > Telefon: > ++494027800926 (Studio) > ++491733135456 (mobil) > ++494065055216 (Fax) > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >

>RTAS will never be supported in Logic. It's only for the Pro Tools >software. And Digital Performer... Digidesign have publically stated (on the DUC) that Apple can, if they want to, code to support RTAS and that Digi do nothing to stop Apple from doing so. JR

If you can find out how to do this please share! This means you can run some channels in MAS and others in DAE? I prefer Logic's workflow as well but find DP a nice combination of Protools and Logic functionality. I've just never gotten it to be very stable. On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Mark Ziebarth wrote: > Hi Erik, > Yes, it's true. I forgot to mention that Digital Performers "ESB" > works with > 32 mono channels (or 16 stereo) in both directions. But people told > me that > it's a little bit sophisticated to make "ESB" work. But once it's > done... > I never tried Digital Performer myself and don't know if the MotU > program is > PT7 compatible right now. > > Regards > > Mark > > > Am 30.01.2006 19:34 Uhr schrieb "Erik Huber" unter > <erockerboy@yahoo.com>: > >> >> Is that true?? Sounds like a real stick in the eye for Logic if >> that's really >> the case. >> >> Any word on whether DP is compatible w/ PT7 yet? >> >> >> --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Mark Ziebarth <mark@a...> wrote: >>> >>> Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency >>> compensation of >>> TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to >>> and from >>> TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... > > -- > Mark Ziebarth > Mühlenkamp 12 d > 22303 Hamburg > Telefon: > ++494027800926 (Studio) > ++491733135456 (mobil) > ++494065055216 (Fax) > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >

Hi Judson, I'm not a Digital Performer user, so I don't know the insides of how to make something similar to "ESB" work in that program. I was only amazed of how much integration of TDM seems to be possible. Maybe Logic 7.2 brings some of these features. I will try to find out some more detailed information about Digital Performers "ESB". Regards Mark Am 30.01.2006 22:26 Uhr schrieb "Judson" unter <motu@judsoncrane.com>: > If you can find out how to do this please share! This means you > can run some channels in MAS and others in DAE? I prefer Logic's > workflow as well but find DP a nice combination of Protools and Logic > functionality. I've just never gotten it to be very stable. > > On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Mark Ziebarth wrote: -- Mark Ziebarth Mühlenkamp 12 d 22303 Hamburg Telefon: ++494027800926 (Studio) ++491733135456 (mobil) ++494065055216 (Fax)

>> RTAS will never be supported in Logic. It's only for the Pro Tools >> software. From: Mark Ziebarth <mark@allinonemusic.de> > Hi Nick, > Digital Performer can handle RTAS-plug-ins and even latency > compensation of > TDM-plug-ins and their kind of "ESB" works in both directions to > and from > TDM. There is room for improvement in Logic TDM... You're right, I should have added that DP does RTAS. And sure there's room for improvement with Logic's TDM implementation - I'm just going out on the limb and saying we won't see flying pigs or RTAS support in Logic any time soon. Same with VST; Apple's standard is AU. Nick Batzdorf, editor/publisher Virtual Instruments Magazine - the world of softsynths and samplers www.Virtualinstrumentsmag.com 1-877 VImagzn (846-2496) 818/905-9101, cell 590-9101

From Apple's website: > >"Logic Pro 7.2 is fully compatible with the Pro Tools 7.1 version >of DAE. All features are supported, including ESB and EXS24TDM. > Ivo Witteveen <ivo@qualityquartet.com> wrote: > >'All features' is a bit cryptic here - it could mean 'all relevant Pro >Tools >features' (which would include RTAS) or it could mean 'all features >previously available in Logic Pro's TDM support' > >At least, that's how I read it, so to me there's no conclusive evidence on >RTAS not being present in 7.2 in this text. Am I wrong? Or just too >optimistic? Logic 7.2 doesn't support RTAS. If it did, you can be sure that it would heralded as a major feature enhancement for Logic/TDM users especially now that HDTM has been abandoned. So "All Features" means: those features that were part of Logic. HDTM is a Digidesign feature. Emagic never "supported" HTDM plugins. Logic SUPPORTS the DAE (Digidesign Audio Engine), which in turn does all the audio engine stuff. So when Digidesign added HTDM support, Emagic didn't have to do anything - it was just magically there since Logic supports the DAE. And now Digi has removed HTDM support. And since the DAE for ProTools7 is a major rewrite, there was no sensible way for Logic7.2 to support both DAE6 and DAE7, since that part of Logic (the DAE support) is also a big change. Again, Logic supports the DAE itself, and everything that comes or doesn't come with it. The thing about RTAS support is that it's VERY VERY different from HDTM support. An HTDM plug looked just like a TDM plugin to Logic, except that the DAE would route it to and from the Mac's CPU for the DSP. That's not how the RTAS implementation works exactly. An RTAS plugin is its own individual format, that would require a major undertaking (as would supporting AU, or VST etc...). RTAS plugins do NOT look like TDM plugins in native form under the hood. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

Recently, Logic and DAE have been ignoring my record path settings and recording audio tracks directly to the same folder that has the Logic song file in it. The good news is, the recording is working just fine... but it's in the wrong place and I have to move the files after they are recorded. I recall some discussions about this issue but did not find them searching the archive... would someone remind me the story about this? Thanks! - Dave Logic 7.1, PT 6.9, OSX 10.3.8, dual 1G, 1.5G RAM

The new DP5 is coming out and has some interesting features included the opening folders (like in the finder windows) where you can see the content of a folder without opening another arrange window .. Something that's been in Cubase/Nuendo forever and now in DP ... http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM06/Content/MOTU/PR/Digital-Performer-5. html Is that such a hard feature to implement ? Paul Mazzolini MD pm@softworks.it http://www.softworks.it > From: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> > Reply-To: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> > Date: 30 Jan 2006 23:58:55 -0000 > To: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [L-TDM] Digest Number 2353 > > Subject: AW: AW: Re: Logic 7.2 and RTAS??? > > Hi Judson, > I'm not a Digital Performer user, so I don't know the insides of how to make > something similar to "ESB" work in that program. I was only amazed of how > much integration of TDM seems to be possible. Maybe Logic 7.2 brings some of > these features. > I will try to find out some more detailed information about Digital > Performers "ESB". > > Regards > > Mark > > > Am 30.01.2006 22:26 Uhr schrieb "Judson" unter <motu@judsoncrane.com>: > >> If you can find out how to do this please share! This means you >> can run some channels in MAS and others in DAE? I prefer Logic's >> workflow as well but find DP a nice combination of Protools and Logic >> functionality. I've just never gotten it to be very stable. >> >> On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Mark Ziebarth wrote: > > -- > Mark Ziebarth > Mühlenkamp 12 d > 22303 Hamburg > Telefon: > ++494027800926 (Studio) > ++491733135456 (mobil) > ++494065055216 (Fax) > > > > >

Hi David, AFAIK the best way is to remove the record path in the Audio Configuration window: <edit><remove record path>. Then the next time you hit the rec. enable button on a track, Logic will ask you where to put the recording. The recording path issue seems to be a little problematic still, especially when moving from track 1-32 to 33-64. Sometimes it works to name the recordings in the Audio Rec. window (A), sometimes not. Hope this will be solved with 7.2, as well as all the other erratic features. Best wishes Alar --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, David Gordon <music-pro@c...> wrote: > > Recently, Logic and DAE have been ignoring my record path settings > and recording audio tracks directly to the same folder that has the > Logic song file in it. > > The good news is, the recording is working just fine... but it's in > the wrong place and I have to move the files after they are recorded. > > I recall some discussions about this issue but did not find them > searching the archive... would someone remind me the story about this? > > Thanks! > - Dave > > Logic 7.1, PT 6.9, OSX 10.3.8, dual 1G, 1.5G RAM >

Logic has had this since version 6. It does much more than just show folders and contents though. It will show what samples belong to the instruments related to sessions. You can play and import audio from it. You can do extensive searches with it. I think it's just called the Browser. Forgot my damn USB key at home, so I can't check. Man I'm sick of all these damn USB keys. I have 5 now. iLok, Logic, Peak, Sound Soap Pro, Cubase. b On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:23 AM, Paul Mazzolini wrote: > The new DP5 is coming out and has some interesting features > included the > opening folders (like in the finder windows) where you can see the > content > of a folder without opening another arrange window .. Something > that's been > in Cubase/Nuendo forever and now in DP ... > http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM06/Content/MOTU/PR/Digital- > Performer-5. > html > Is that such a hard feature to implement ? > Paul Mazzolini > MD > > pm@softworks.it > http://www.softworks.it > > >> From: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> >> Reply-To: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> >> Date: 30 Jan 2006 23:58:55 -0000 >> To: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> >> Subject: [L-TDM] Digest Number 2353 >> >> Subject: AW: AW: Re: Logic 7.2 and RTAS??? >> >> Hi Judson, >> I'm not a Digital Performer user, so I don't know the insides of >> how to make >> something similar to "ESB" work in that program. I was only amazed >> of how >> much integration of TDM seems to be possible. Maybe Logic 7.2 >> brings some of >> these features. >> I will try to find out some more detailed information about Digital >> Performers "ESB". >> >> Regards >> >> Mark >> >> >> Am 30.01.2006 22:26 Uhr schrieb "Judson" unter >> <motu@judsoncrane.com>: >> >>> If you can find out how to do this please share! This means you >>> can run some channels in MAS and others in DAE? I prefer Logic's >>> workflow as well but find DP a nice combination of Protools and >>> Logic >>> functionality. I've just never gotten it to be very stable. >>> >>> On Jan 30, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Mark Ziebarth wrote:

i get that problem when using track 33 plus. 1-32 works fine i thinks its a know bug m 31 jan 2006 kl. 07.22 skrev David Gordon: > Recently, Logic and DAE have been ignoring my record path settings > and recording audio tracks directly to the same folder that has the > Logic song file in it. > > The good news is, the recording is working just fine... but it's in > the wrong place and I have to move the files after they are recorded. > > I recall some discussions about this issue but did not find them > searching the archive... would someone remind me the story about this? > > Thanks! > - Dave > > Logic 7.1, PT 6.9, OSX 10.3.8, dual 1G, 1.5G RAM > >

I was talking about folders within the arrange window ... Paul Mazzolini MD pm@softworks.it http://www.softworks.it > From: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> > Reply-To: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> > Date: 31 Jan 2006 22:31:29 -0000 > To: "logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com" <logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [L-TDM] Digest Number 2354 > > From: Bob DeMaa <bobdemaa@mac.com> > Subject: Re: Re: Logic 7.2 and RTAS??? > > Logic has had this since version 6. It does much more than just show > folders and contents though. It will show what samples belong to the > instruments related to sessions. You can play and import audio from > it. You can do extensive searches with it. > > I think it's just called the Browser. Forgot my damn USB key at > home, so I can't check. Man I'm sick of all these damn USB keys. I > have 5 now. iLok, Logic, Peak, Sound Soap Pro, Cubase. > > b > > On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:23 AM, Paul Mazzolini wrote: > >> The new DP5 is coming out and has some interesting features >> included the >> opening folders (like in the finder windows) where you can see the >> content >> of a folder without opening another arrange window .. Something >> that's been >> in Cubase/Nuendo forever and now in DP ... >> http://namm.harmony-central.com/WNAMM06/Content/MOTU/PR/Digital- >> Performer-5. >> html >> Is that such a hard feature to implement ? >> Paul Mazzolini >> MD >> >> pm@softworks.it >> http://www.softworks.it

Hi, I just returned a Mix Cubed refurb and a 888/24 fter receiving 2 bad Mix Farm cards. This was purchased from an authorized reseller also. I've been a native user of Logic for a few years and decided to get into TDM since there were such great deals on Mix Plus systems. Anyone had major Mix Farm card problems? I thought I had a PowerCore problem figured out but I posted my "not so good" results a few days ago. I'm now looking at purchasing a new HD2 setup and a new Dual or Quad Core G5.

With the loss of HTDM does anyone know if there is going to be any way of using Altiverb (or any native fx) in the TDM Mixer ? Altiverb is my main reverb and i paid good money for it i'll be gutted if i cant use it in TDM anymore.

This happened to me..don't know what caused it but I: Opened Audio Configuration, selected DAE engine and Remove Record Path, then did same for the Core engine (if our using it) and this cleared the problem. Been ok for months now Mark --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, David Gordon <music-pro@c...> wrote: > > Recently, Logic and DAE have been ignoring my record path settings > and recording audio tracks directly to the same folder that has the > Logic song file in it. > > The good news is, the recording is working just fine... but it's in > the wrong place and I have to move the files after they are recorded. > > I recall some discussions about this issue but did not find them > searching the archive... would someone remind me the story about this? > > Thanks! > - Dave > > Logic 7.1, PT 6.9, OSX 10.3.8, dual 1G, 1.5G RAM >

Hi, I would check out this new interface (for Logic, Soundtrack Pro and GarageBand) first.. http://www.apogeedigital.com/products/ensemble.php I decided not to try to intergrate PT and Logic anymore since 2 years and my life has become a lot more 'stressless' ;-) Composing in Logic and post production in PT. Cheers, Renger On Feb 1, 2006, at 6 ---------- :05 AM, guitar01_2001 wrote: > Hi, > I just returned a Mix Cubed refurb and a 888/24 fter receiving 2 > bad Mix Farm cards. This > was purchased from an authorized reseller also. I've been a native > user of Logic for a few > years and decided to get into TDM since there were such great deals > on Mix Plus systems. > Anyone had major Mix Farm card problems? I thought I had a > PowerCore problem figured > out but I posted my "not so good" results a few days ago. I'm now > looking at purchasing a > new HD2 setup and a new Dual or Quad Core G5. > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >