dont have any solid info on this - hear alot of digi gossip but havent heard this. would be a stupid bizniz moove wouldn't? markus 20 nov 2005 kl. 11.27 skrev Richard G. Mitchell: > I live and work in the UK and sometimes use engineers from a very well > known studio which is owned by a very well known world wide artist > that > has always had very close working associations with Digi and various > music technology companies over the years. > > The conversation currently buzzing around that studio is that > Digidesign are moving the next generation of Protools over to work > exclusively on PC .......... is this just "idol" gossip or information > that anyone else could verify-?? > > Best wishes to all > Richard >

Sorry, a little OT (I know)... I currently own a G4/867mhz running a mix system (OSX 10.3.4) Now I´m getting a dual 1.25ghz in a few days, my question would be: The OSX harddrive running PT and Logic Pro inside the 867mhz machine, would it work just installing it inside the 1.25ghz machine? Anyone tried this before? Or will I need to go the hard way (meaning installing everything all over) Any help would be greatly appreciated. I don´t want to mess up my registered plugins etc :-( Henning.

Hi there, I am doing that, too, since I have splitted Logic and PT. For Audio (TDM) Tracks I am doing the following: Copy a Audio Region to the start of the song. I mostly take Single Audio-Click to have more control. Then merge the track's audio files, so that you've got a few audio-files, that start at exact the same time. Than import it to PT. That's of course all without any mixes or plugins. If you want to have it all with TDM Plugs, you have to Mute all other Tracks and use the "normal" bounce Button on the Output. But that's really hard if you have many TDM tracks. Regards, Axel Am 21.11.2005 um 12:02 schrieb markus enochson: > dont have any solid info on this - hear alot of digi gossip but > havent heard this. > > would be a stupid bizniz moove wouldn't? > > markus > > 20 nov 2005 kl. 11.27 skrev Richard G. Mitchell: > >> I live and work in the UK and sometimes use engineers from a very >> well >> known studio which is owned by a very well known world wide artist >> that >> has always had very close working associations with Digi and various >> music technology companies over the years. >> >> The conversation currently buzzing around that studio is that >> Digidesign are moving the next generation of Protools over to work >> exclusively on PC .......... is this just "idol" gossip or >> information >> that anyone else could verify-?? >> >> Best wishes to all >> Richard >> > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >

dear all: We are having 96K session more often now.. but we still want to use the KSP 8 with AES option for mixidown. since the KSP 8 is only 48K device. We try to chose the SR conversion on the 192 Digital. we still got the error from KSP 8. pops and click for all 8 channles any idea?? ------- Best Regards Bobo Mark "May music move your heart" On 21 Nov 2005, at 8:51 PM, Axel Rohrbach wrote: > Hi there, > > I am doing that, too, since I have splitted Logic and PT. For Audio > (TDM) Tracks I am doing the following: Copy a Audio Region to the > start of the song. I mostly take Single Audio-Click to have more > control. Then merge the track's audio files, so that you've got a few > audio-files, that start at exact the same time. Than import it to PT. > That's of course all without any mixes or plugins. If you want to > have it all with TDM Plugs, you have to Mute all other Tracks and use > the "normal" bounce Button on the Output. But that's really hard if > you have many TDM tracks. > > Regards, > > Axel > > Am 21.11.2005 um 12:02 schrieb markus enochson: > >> dont have any solid info on this - hear alot of digi gossip but >> havent heard this. >> >> would be a stupid bizniz moove wouldn't? >> >> markus >> >> 20 nov 2005 kl. 11.27 skrev Richard G. Mitchell: >> >>> I live and work in the UK and sometimes use engineers from a very >>> well >>> known studio which is owned by a very well known world wide artist >>> that >>> has always had very close working associations with Digi and various >>> music technology companies over the years. >>> >>> The conversation currently buzzing around that studio is that >>> Digidesign are moving the next generation of Protools over to work >>> exclusively on PC .......... is this just "idol" gossip or >>> information >>> that anyone else could verify-?? >>> >>> Best wishes to all >>> Richard >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> _ >> __ >> Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- >> TDM >> - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ >> search >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >

matt@mattrixx.net wrote: >does it matter? Only if the rash on the shaft is itchy. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

On 21 Nov 2005, at 13:17, Henning Kristiansen wrote: > Sorry, a little OT (I know)... > > I currently own a G4/867mhz running a mix system (OSX 10.3.4) > > Now I´m getting a dual 1.25ghz in a few days, my question would be: > > The OSX harddrive running PT and Logic Pro inside the 867mhz machine, > would > it work just installing it inside the 1.25ghz machine? Anyone tried > this > before? Or will I need to go the hard way (meaning installing > everything all > over) > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. I don´t want to mess up my > registered > plugins etc :-( > > Probably not. You have to find out from your Apple dealer, but my experience has been that connectors are usually slightly different from machine to machine. But you don't have to go the hard way. When installing OSX 10.4.3 on the new Mac you will be prompted whether you want to transfer files on another computer to the new one. Just use your old Mac in firewire diskmodus and transfer all your files automatically (and setups and home folder). Needs only minor if any tweaking afterwards. Cheers, Bob.

: D ... ! On Nov 21, 2005, at 15:24, f-erenc szabo wrote: > matt@mattrixx.net wrote: >> does it matter? > > Only if the rash on the shaft is itchy. Raphael Vang Posaunist www.raphael-vang.de 0221 / 492 7894 0175 / 890 5821

On 21 Nov 2005, at 13:17, Henning Kristiansen wrote: > Sorry, a little OT (I know)... > > I currently own a G4/867mhz running a mix system (OSX 10.3.4) > > Now I´m getting a dual 1.25ghz in a few days, my question would be: > > The OSX harddrive running PT and Logic Pro inside the 867mhz machine, > would > it work just installing it inside the 1.25ghz machine? Anyone tried > this > before? Or will I need to go the hard way (meaning installing > everything all > over) > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. I don´t want to mess up my > registered > plugins etc :-( > > Fogot to mention, but for challenge-response authorized plugins you will have to get new authorizations of course.

OMF is still the best tool for transferring a Logic session to PT, although I agree on the hefty pricetag for that option. But it saves a lot of time, so.... I don't know about the freezefiles thing really, that's something I've never used. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I dont think you can export a freezed file to PT. You'd need to bounce it with the native plug first, if you want to keep it processed. The resolution would end up the same as in the original file, be it 16 or 24. 32-bit is the internal processing resolution only, AFAIK. The best way to make audiotracks from an EXS is to "export track as audio file". If you have a stereo output from the EXS, the resulting soundfile will be in stereo panned the way it comes out from the EXS. And you'll have the option to choose the resolution. I have a question too, has anyone used the AAF-export option instead of OMF in Logic and succeeded in opening that in ProTools? The AAF interchange format is a newer algorithm than OMF and supposedly better, but my PT just freezes if it comes near an AAF-file....although it's supposed to work acc. to the manual. Cheers Alar --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Ivo Witteveen <ivo@q...> wrote: > > Good question, whish I could help... Need to do the exact same thing. Tried > 'Export: All tracks to audiofiles' but apparently this functions should be > read as 'Export: all tracks (except TDM tracks of course, you stupid!) to > audiofiles' because the only things that got exported where my three native > tracks, not the 48 TDM tracks... > > For OMF you need the PT OMF options which is ridiciously expensive so I > don't have that it. I don't want to bounce track-by-track in realtime so I'm > now going for just merging all the regions per audiotrack, still tiresome > but faster than real time. This works because I wont the raw audio, not the > processing that's on the tracks. > > If anyone knows a better way please chime in... > > Regards, > > Ivo > > > Hi all, > > > > just wondering how people are going about transfers to Pro Tools. I may need > > to do this > > soon and want to get the best results. > > > > 1) Can freeze files be read in PT as 32-bit, or does PT just see them as 16 > > (not even 24)? > > > > 2) How best to make audio tracks out of drum samples coming out of stereo EXS > > that are > > really just mono samples with slight panning? > > > > 3) I think OMFs are still working just fine. Can anyone elucidate? > > > > Much Thanks in advance, > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM > > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/search > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

....or use CCC (CarbonCopyCloner) to make a bootable clone of your system disc. Don't know what will happen to your challenge/response autorizations, but you'll probably have to get new ones. But it might work...? Saves you a lot of tweaking, anyways. /alar --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Bob Lowen <low1@s...> wrote: > > > On 21 Nov 2005, at 13:17, Henning Kristiansen wrote: > > > Sorry, a little OT (I know)... > > > > I currently own a G4/867mhz running a mix system (OSX 10.3.4) > > > > Now I´m getting a dual 1.25ghz in a few days, my question would be: > > > > The OSX harddrive running PT and Logic Pro inside the 867mhz machine, > > would > > it work just installing it inside the 1.25ghz machine? Anyone tried > > this > > before? Or will I need to go the hard way (meaning installing > > everything all > > over) > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. I don´t want to mess up my > > registered > > plugins etc :-( > > > > > > Probably not. You have to find out from your Apple dealer, but my > experience has been that connectors are usually slightly different from > machine to machine. > > But you don't have to go the hard way. When installing OSX 10.4.3 on > the new Mac you will be prompted whether you want to transfer files on > another computer to the new one. Just use your old Mac in firewire > diskmodus and transfer all your files automatically (and setups and > home folder). Needs only minor if any tweaking afterwards. > > Cheers, Bob. >

Yes there may be some machine specific OS functions which will not get along with your mdd mac. If I recall on mine I tried booting from an old volume and there was a firmware or pram issue, not sure which but do remember needing to reset the pram to get it happy again. --

--- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@g...> wrote: > Audio can only flow from DTDM to TDM, not vice versa. > > If you use CoreAudio instead of DTDM, you get the advantage > of bidirectional communication. Of course, you need to physically > connect your CoreAudio interface's audio to your TDM interface. "billesses" <billesses@yahoo.com> on Monday, November 21, 2005 at 9:12 AM -0500 wrote: >just wondering what interface you are using for core audio >in Logic, or what you would recommend getting today (if >you were buying now). Also, I'm running Logic and PT >simultaneously on 2 CPUs - any preferred sync methods? >I want to be able to sync either way and don't want to buy >a SYNC I/O. I use DTDM, but I've set up some other rigs with CoreAudio interfaces. The MOTU 828 Mark2 works well. I lightpiped it to the 192 i/o for bi-directional communication on a HD rig. You don't need a Sync i/o ---- you just slave the CoreAudio interface to the HD's interface. You could also do it backwards, but my assumption was that the HD rig's clock was just fine. For running ProTools and Logic software simultanously on two different computers, use MIDI to sync them. You can even send MMC from the slave back to the master so that both transports will work for both computers. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

> matt@mattrixx.net wrote: >> does it matter? > > Only if the rash on the shaft is itchy. > > > f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Hey f-erence, What's that about? The last message I wrote to the list was; ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- > But we're lazy. And bastards. You'll just have > to get yourself a new email account because we're > too busy fucking. > f-erenc, you're cracking me up... That was funny!! ;-) LOL ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- So I don't know where the 'does it matter?' line came from. In fact I did a search through my sent mailbox and I have not said this. Best Regards, Matt _____________________________________ MATT MCKENZIE-SMITH MUSIC • AUDIO DESIGN • PRODUCTION PO Box 10395, Adelaide 5000, South Australia. Ph.+61 416 197 883 mattrixx.net _____________________________________

matt@mattrixx.net wrote: >> does it matter? > > Only if the rash on the shaft is itchy. > f-erenc szabo, smarty pants matt@mattrixx.net wrote: Hey f-erence, What's that about? The last message I wrote to the list was; ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- > But we're lazy. And bastards. You'll just have > to get yourself a new email account because we're > too busy fucking. > f-erenc, you're cracking me up... That was funny!! ;-) LOL ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- The above was to DAW-MAC, not to L-TDM, but that's beside the point. Matt McKenzie-Smith <matt@mattrixx.net> wrote: >So I don't know where the 'does it matter?' line came >from. In fact I did a search through my sent mailbox >and I have not said this. >Best Regards, >Matt I double checked and there is definitely that message from your email address. Here is the Internet Header from that message in case it tells you if it's somebody impersonating you, or if it actually came from your account because somebody hacked it. It sure looked like one of those spam/automated emails Begin Internet Header: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Return-Path: <sentto-279163-22843-1132571690-Logic-TDM=goodmedia.com@returns.groups.ya hoo.com> Received: from ns3.goodmedia.com (216.90.51.61) by smtp.goodmedia.com (FirstClass Mail Server v8.0) with SMTP (Sender: sentto-279163-22843-1132571690-Logic-TDM=goodmedia.com@returns.groups.yahoo. com) transient id 1439; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:14:28 -0500 Received: (qmail 25474 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Nov 2005 11:15:02 -0000 Received: from sentto-279163-22843-1132571690-Logic-TDM=goodmedia.com@returns.groups.yahoo. com by ns3 by uid 64011 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.67. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:0(209.73.160.77):SA:0(2.7/5.0):. Processed in 4.676548 secs); 21 Nov 2005 11:15:02 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: ++ Received: from unknown (HELO n10b.bulk.scd.yahoo.com) (209.73.160.77) by ns3.goodmedia.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2005 11:14:57 -0000 Received: from [66.218.69.2] by n27.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Nov 2005 11:14:52 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.36] by mailer2.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Nov 2005 11:14:50 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-email X-YahooFilteredBulk: 220.137.74.37 X-Sender: matt@mattrixx.net X-Apparently-To: logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 20097 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2005 11:14:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m30.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Nov 2005 11:14:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yahoogroups.com) (220.137.74.37) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2005 11:14:44 -0000 To: logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Originating-IP: 220.137.74.37 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 2:11:20:0 From: matt@mattrixx.net X-Yahoo-Profile: mattrixx31 Sender: logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com; contact logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com List-Id: <logic-tdm.yahoogroups.com> Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:16:00 +0800 Subject: [L-TDM] read it immediatelly Reply-To: logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113257169867225443@ns3> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ End Internet Header: It's mostly gobblygook to me! f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

> And another thing... > Treat each cue as a separate session even if the music segues into each > other. You can make a template for each act/reel or chunk of digitized > video or tape, and use that as a start point for each one, adjusting the > smpte for bar 1 (I actually set my start time at bar 3 to allow for preroll > at mixdown) each time. That way any changes to a cue do not affect the > subsequent cues tempo maps. And one other thing... Bounce as SDII Files, align in the Session and write Region to File in the Audio Window. Set up a "master song" Just drag the Bounces in the Master and do "Region to Original (record?) Position" - Voila! - a Masterplaylist - a no-brainer. Nikolaus Sieveking nap - nichtlineareaudioproduktionen <niko@nichtlinear.de> <www.nichtlinear.de>

> matt@mattrixx.net wrote: >>> does it matter? Hi f-erenc, That is spooky, because I just ent back and checked all sent mail and I definitely did not write that!! Thanks for the heads up on the mail header! Best Regards, Matt _____________________________________ MATT MCKENZIE-SMITH MUSIC • AUDIO DESIGN • PRODUCTION PO Box 10395, Adelaide 5000, South Australia. Ph.+61 416 197 883 mattrixx.net _____________________________________

I just upgraded to ProTools 7 HD (from 6.9) and know Logic Pro 7.1.1 crashes on startup. More users with this problem?

Logic is not compatible with PT 7 for now. Peter --- http://www.merlinsound.de forums@logic-users.org wrote: > Message posted by Niels Hermes <n.hermes@chello.nl> > ______________________________________________________________________ > > I just upgraded to ProTools 7 HD (from 6.9) and know Logic Pro 7.1.1 > crashes on startup. > More users with this problem?

forums@logic-users.org wrote: > I just upgraded to ProTools 7 HD (from 6.9) and know > Logic Pro 7.1.1 crashes on startup. Logic is not currently compatible with ProTools 7. A future version of Logic will eventually be compatible. No exact release date has been announced. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

Good eavning group! So, I had my first "big" session in LP7 today. 24 channels simultaneously, fairly smooth. On a side note; I ran my TDM rig controlled by my Powerbook with Remote Desktop, thus joining the band on vocals and guitar. Nobody in the control room! Pretty cool... Anyway, towards the end of the day when editing and compiling todays session DAE channel 1 started to play randomly chosen audiofiles, not in sync with the rest. Anyone had this and know the cure? Sorry if this has been covered before, just let me know and I'll scan for it! Thank In Advance, Erik

Hi, How do you know? What more do you know? Is this a certainty? Thanks >f-erenc szabo wrote: > >A future version of Logic will eventually be compatible. >No exact release date has been announced. >

I would like to know if this controller is compatible with Logic Pro 7 (mix system). And how well does it perform with this setup? Any info would be most appreciated. Thanks. Henning.

On Nov 30, 2005, at 5:20 PM, logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com wrote: > From: Parthenon West <logicboy@christian.net> > Subject: Re: ProTools 7 incompatible with Logic Pro 7.1.1? > > Hi, > > How do you know? What more do you know? Is this a certainty? > > Thanks Digidesign have said on the DUC that they are cooperating with Apple to have a PT7 compatible version within the next few months. I believe April is roughly when we will see it. JR

Henning Kristiansen <pro.studio@chello.no> wrote: >I would like to know if this controller is compatible with Logic Pro 7 No Digidesign controller surface is compatible with anything other than ProTools software. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>

Good evening Erik! Yes, this is a fact with LP7, and very annoying. The only way to avoid this bug is to move the soundfiles on ch 1 to another channel. And I don't know why this is, but I think it's been discussed in previous posts. Alar --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, "godmouth1965" <eriksojdelius@b...> wrote: > > Good eavning group! > > So, I had my first "big" session in LP7 today. 24 channels simultaneously, fairly smooth. > > On a side note; I ran my TDM rig controlled by my Powerbook with Remote Desktop, thus > joining the band on vocals and guitar. Nobody in the control room! Pretty cool... > > Anyway, towards the end of the day when editing and compiling todays session DAE channel > 1 started to play randomly chosen audiofiles, not in sync with the rest. Anyone had this and > know the cure? > > Sorry if this has been covered before, just let me know and I'll scan for it! > > Thank In Advance, > > Erik >