Hi all, Anyone in Brugge/Bruges? I'm going to be there from Wednesday to Sunday this week, would love to hook up with anyone on the list who's nearby and have a Flemish beer. Cheers Jon Jon Cotton Production, Protools and String arranging Artisan Audio http://www.artisan-audio.co.uk/

I live in brussels. On 9/23/03 5:33 AM, "Jon Cotton" <jon.sunflower@...> wrote: > Hi all, > > Anyone in Brugge/Bruges? > > I'm going to be there from Wednesday to Sunday this week, would love > to hook up with anyone on the list who's nearby and have a Flemish > beer. > > Cheers > > Jon > > Jon Cotton > > Production, Protools and String arranging > > Artisan Audio > http://www.artisan-audio.co.uk/ > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > >

Logic 6.2.1 OS 10.2.3 1GHz PowerBook It seems that the quantization behaviour has a bug. - Quantize a part non-destructively using Extended parameters, and include a Q-Vel setting, as well as the regular quantization grid choice. - Next, use the Q-Tool in a Matrix Editor, or the Q- pop-up in a Matrix or List Editor, and quantize a single note in the sequence. What's now happening is that ALL the notes in the sequence are being reset to their as-played veloctiy EXCEPT for the note just quantized. All other notes in the sequence do still retain their placement as specified in the Extended parameters. – The way it used to work: only the note edited with the Q-tool or Q-pop-up would revert to it's as-played settings. All other notes in the sequence would not be affected, as they are now. I've reported this to support on the new web form (no more emails to Emagic support . . . ). Jonathan Perl Sonic Arts Center @ CCNY http://sonic.arts.ccny.cuny.edu "Make Sound Your World"

LAMP 6.1 OS 10.2.3 MAc 1 Ghz Powerbook I just detailed in a previous bug report how the Q-Tool is misbehaving. Now Iha ve discovered that the "Q_Flam" option in Extended Parameters is broken. -If I start to adjust the value in Q-GFlam to other than ), chordal notes start moving later and later in the sequencer, pushing them totally out of time. It seems to start where Logic detects the first chord within a sequence. The worst effects occur later on in the sequence, where the notes are puched further out of time. Totally broken. I assume since I just came across two quantize bugs, there are likely to be more... Also reported to Emagic . . Jonathan Perl Sonic Arts Center @ CCNY http://sonic.arts.ccny.cuny.edu "Make Sound Your World"

Oops - I just submitted the bug report regarding Q-Flam in Extended Paramters. I think I was wrong - and was simply using values that were too large. And/Or the problem is noit recurring in a new sequence. Sorry . . . Jonathan Perl Sonic Arts Center @ CCNY http://sonic.arts.ccny.cuny.edu "Make Sound Your World"

Hi Jan, Thanks alot dude... Checked out their stuff, pretty cool. Though it's a little expensive. Seems like the benefits of a desk might be argued againts the price of the the rack. Hmm...thinkin.... Cheers KIT On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 12:42 AM, Jan Stevens wrote: > Kit, > > I've been boardless for over two years and I haven't looked back. I > went for the "StudioComm" from Studio Technologies (Illinois). It's > basically the monitor section from a console that fits on a single rack > space. They have a few different models - check them out. > On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 11:31 PM, KIT wrote: > >> >> Hi... >> >> I'm planning of changing my setup without a mixer this time. Running >> on >> HD2 and Logic 6.1... i was thinking of using a patchbay connecting to >> the DB-25 connection and getting the mackie control universal. Are >> there any other ways to do this better without a mixer that would >> still >> allow me to control the input levels. >> >> >> Cheers >> >> KIT >> >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >> >> >> >> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> >> > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to > logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >

Kit, Ya know, I love all that space. Having no board is really cool and about 5 miles less cables. I use a Digi 1622 going into my legacy port of my 192 for all of my synths, thats how to add 16 analog ins to your rig. I think another company makes a cheaper one then the Studio Techs, although I can't vouch for their quality. Check out the Samson Control Room Matrix (C.Control). It looks like it has all of the goodies and it's only 99.00 list! Let me know if it's good. Jan On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 11:21 PM, KIT wrote: > Hi Jan, > > Thanks alot dude... Checked out their stuff, pretty cool. Though it's a > little expensive. Seems like the benefits of a desk might be argued > againts the price of the the rack. Hmm...thinkin.... > > Cheers > KIT > > On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 12:42 AM, Jan Stevens wrote: > >> Kit, >> >> I've been boardless for over two years and I haven't looked back. I >> went for the "StudioComm" from Studio Technologies (Illinois). It's >> basically the monitor section from a console that fits on a single >> rack >> space. They have a few different models - check them out. >> On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 11:31 PM, KIT wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi... >>> >>> I'm planning of changing my setup without a mixer this time. Running >>> on >>> HD2 and Logic 6.1... i was thinking of using a patchbay connecting to >>> the DB-25 connection and getting the mackie control universal. Are >>> there any other ways to do this better without a mixer that would >>> still >>> allow me to control the input levels. >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> KIT >>> >>> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >>> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >>> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >>> >>> >> >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >> >> >> >> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to > logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

Hey guys, I have a client who is upgrading his antiquate G3/ Mix+/ Logic 4 system to something new and here is our question: Should we go with A) Dual Proc 1.66 G4, PTHD and Logic 6 in OS9 (I know about the 6.2 probs); or B) G5 single 1.6 G5, PTHD, Logic 6 in OSX? Any help would be appreciated. I will mainly use Logic for MIDI and PT for audio for the time being. Regards, kags

>Hey guys, > >I have a client who is upgrading his antiquate G3/ Mix+/ Logic 4 system to >something new and here is our question: > >Should we go with A) Dual Proc 1.66 G4, PTHD and Logic 6 in OS9 (I know >about the 6.2 probs); or B) G5 single 1.6 G5, PTHD, Logic 6 in OSX? > > >Any help would be appreciated. I will mainly use Logic for MIDI and PT for >audio for the time being. PT does not yet work on a G5, so you'll need to wait on that. In all seriousness, running PT and Logic is going to be a mess for awhile. The dust hasn't settled yet from the transition to HD and to OSX, and now Digidesign is introducing a new Accel system which will require plug-ins to be rewritten again. If I were you, I think I'd seriously consider a dual processor 2 Ghz G5, some high quality convertors, and *NO* ProTools hardware. If you're upgrading from Logic 4, all the new stuff in Logic 6 (especially in the automation department) is going to be a dramatic improvement. Plus, if you're working in Logic, the new Freeze function would seriously stretch the massive amount of DSP that the DP G5 has. I'm trying hard to be optimistic, but with the rate of change accelerating, I really wonder if all the Logic/PT glitches will ever be ironed out. There's a real advantage to having the operating system, computer hardware, and the lion's share of your audio software all essentially made by the same company (Apple). I'm sitting here with an HD6 system and four 192's, really wishing I wasn't so heavily invested in Digidesign gear right now. It doesn't seem that Digidesign is going to ever get that serious about MIDI, scoring, etc., so Logic is definitely the place for me to be. I personally prefer mixing and editing audio in Logic, too. Version 6 was a real giant step forward in that department. Take the money you would have invested in PT, and sink it into some high quality outboard DSP (TC Electronics System 6000 or 4000, Eventide Orville, a nice buss compressor, etc.). With the Freeze function, and the huge amount of power in a G5, native audio is now in an entirely different arena. It's now a serious contender. Native now vastly exceeds PT in numbers of tracks that can be played back. There's no longer a need to spend sleepless nights tossing and turning, worrying if Emagic and Digidesign will continue to cooperate. Lee Blaske

ok here's the problem: i recorded a song in Logic audio platinum 4.7(in asio) and then switched drivers(to MAC AV) to listen through another set of speakers. it asked if i wanted to convert song to MAC AV and hit yes (as i normally do, i 've done this before) and everything played fine. the problem is after i was done listining i switched back to ASIO and it DIDN'T ask me if i want to convert song to ASIO. now there is no output and there are lines through my plugins and aoudio intruments. any suggestions???

Kags <akagan@...> writes: >Should we go with A) Dual Proc 1.66 G4, PTHD and >Logic 6 in OS9 (I know about the 6.2 probs); or B) G5 >single 1.6 G5, PTHD, Logic 6 in OSX? There is no 1.66 G4 (the fastest is 1.42GHz and the fastest that runs OS9 is dual 1.25GHz). ProTools isn't G5 compatible yet. Digi expects it to be compatible in early October (for the 1.6 and 1.8 G5's) and mid November (for the dual 2GHz G5's). f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!"

Whoa....looks cute...ahaha....and cheap. Might just do the trick. Thanks dude..... I'm now trying out the logic control on the 01V96. Quite nice, Decisions Decisions! Cheers KIT On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 12:35 PM, Jan Stevens wrote: > > Kit, > > Ya know, I love all that space. Having no board is really cool and > about 5 miles less cables. I use a Digi 1622 going into my legacy port > of my 192 for all of my synths, thats how to add 16 analog ins to your > rig. I think another company makes a cheaper one then the Studio Techs, > although I can't vouch for their quality. Check out the Samson > Control > Room Matrix (C.Control). It looks like it has all of the goodies and > it's only 99.00 list! Let me know if it's good. > > > Jan > On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 11:21 PM, KIT wrote: > >> Hi Jan, >> >> Thanks alot dude... Checked out their stuff, pretty cool. Though it's >> a >> little expensive. Seems like the benefits of a desk might be argued >> againts the price of the the rack. Hmm...thinkin.... >> >> Cheers >> KIT >> >> On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 12:42 AM, Jan Stevens wrote: >> >>> Kit, >>> >>> I've been boardless for over two years and I haven't looked back. I >>> went for the "StudioComm" from Studio Technologies (Illinois). It's >>> basically the monitor section from a console that fits on a single >>> rack >>> space. They have a few different models - check them out. >>> On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 11:31 PM, KIT wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi... >>>> >>>> I'm planning of changing my setup without a mixer this time. Running >>>> on >>>> HD2 and Logic 6.1... i was thinking of using a patchbay connecting >>>> to >>>> the DB-25 connection and getting the mackie control universal. Are >>>> there any other ways to do this better without a mixer that would >>>> still >>>> allow me to control the input levels. >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> KIT >>>> >>>> >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >>>> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >>>> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >>> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >>> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >>> >> >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >> >> >> >> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> >> > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to > logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >

You can change it back yourself in the "audio hardware and drivers" menu in one of the drop down menus at the top of the screen. Tick the ASIO box and unclick the MAC AV. Relauch and all the plugs shouldload in fine. Regards, Tim On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 07:40 PM, kin666mydownfall wrote: > ok here's the problem: > i recorded a song in Logic audio platinum 4.7(in asio) and then > switched drivers(to MAC AV) to listen through another set of > speakers. it asked if i wanted to convert song to MAC AV and hit yes > (as i normally do, i 've done this before) and everything played > fine. the problem is after i was done listining i switched back to > ASIO and it DIDN'T ask me if i want to convert song to ASIO. now > there is no output and there are lines through my plugins and aoudio > intruments. any suggestions??? > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to > logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

Logic Platinum 6.2.1 Mac OS 10.2.6 Mac G4 Powerbook 1 Ghz Below is my report to Support: -Logic always resets mod wheel/cc#1 to zero when I stop playback. This should be considered a bug, not a feature. -I checked preferences: All Reset messages unchecked. -I checked Song Settings: set to Chase Controller#1 and Chase on Cycle Jump: then -I Insert track automation cc#1 MIDI event to have Logic reset to desired value, but Logic doesn't seem to chase Track Automation even if it is a MIDI event. SO: -I Insert actual CC#1 event in a sequence in the track. Here Logic resets to 0 on stop, and then chases to correct value only if I stop and play. -Logic doesn't chase if I initiate playback from Pause mode. -Logic doesn't chase if I press Play more than once (that is, without stopping) - it resets to zero and stays there. -Logic doesn't chase if double-click on the ruler to initiate playback - it resets to zero and stays there. These surely must be considered bugs. I believe most or all of this is long-standing, and a real PITA too! Jonathan Perl Human Musical Computer Interface

Ouch! I can't see any justification for it doing that at all. It seems like a pure bug. Why would I want an action on one note to affect all those other notes I'm NOT editing at the moment??? > >> From: "Emagic Inc. Technical Support" <support@...> >> >> >> Jonathan, I emailed Emagic GmbH on this and received a reply that this >> quantizing functionality has been this way since at least version >> 5.5. It >> was suggested to apply the extended parameters after quantizing. >> >> I hope this helps. >> >> Emagic Inc. Technical Support >> support@... >> >> >>> >>> >>> Depth description of the problem : >>> It seems that the quantization behaviour has a bug. >>> - Quantize a part non-destructively using Extended parameters, and >>> include >>> a Q-Vel setting, as well as the regular quantization grid choice. >>> - Next, use the Q-Tool in a Matrix Editor, or the Q- pop-up in a >>> Matrix or >>> List Editor, and quantize a single note in the sequence. What's now >>> happening is that ALL the notes in the sequence are being reset to >>> their >>> as-played veloctiy EXCEPT for the note just quantized. All other >>> notes in >>> the sequence do still retain their placement as specified in the >>> Extended >>> parameters. >>> ? The way it used to work: only the note edited with the Q-tool or >>> Q-pop-up would revert to it's as-played settings. All other notes >>> in the >>> sequence would not be affected, as they are now. Jonathan Perl Sonic Arts Center @ CCNY http://sonic.arts.ccny.cuny.edu "Make Sound Your World"

Kit, I have Logic Control - What's the 01V96? Jan

When I insert the virus plug-in on an aux track, the only way I can hear it is when I trigger the notes with the mouse on the keyboard display. What do I have to do to trigger it with my midi controller like any other track? Thanks Jim Calabrese Logic 6.0 OS 9.2.2 PT HD3 5.31

Or rather heard about it. A producer friend of mine was working on a protools rig with protools 6.2!!! and logic 6.21 on osx. It worked like a dream he told me. He's working on it again on Monday and I'm supposedly getting an update on Tuesday. Keep you all posted. I have not seen a 6.2 download myself... Markus - with a smile!

Markus, Did he say he was getting "Punch On The Fly" without any 9060 errors? JS On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 07:34 AM, audiobuff wrote: > Or rather heard about it. > > A producer friend of mine was working on a protools rig with protools > 6.2!!! > and logic 6.21 on osx. It worked like a dream he told me. He's working > on it > again on Monday and I'm supposedly getting an update on Tuesday. > > Keep you all posted. > > I have not seen a 6.2 download myself... > > Markus - with a smile! > > > > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to > logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

Hi all, Excuse my shameless sales pitch, but I thougt somebody here might be interested in this. I have an unregistered PTHD Extension for Logic Platinum I’d like to sell – bought it too quickly and am not upgrading to PT HD anytime soon – staying with my good old Mix ++++... Asking price is 300 € or $, normally it’s around 499 €. I am based in Germany, pls email me if interested. Thanks ___________________________ Marek Pompetzki Songwriter | Producer | Engineer

He was punching on eight channels without problems. He will try it out hard Monday with plus 30 track rec punches... M Den 03-09-27 16.44, skrev "Jan Stevens" <riverhorse@...>: > Markus, > > Did he say he was getting "Punch On The Fly" without any 9060 errors? > > JS > On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 07:34 AM, audiobuff wrote: > >> Or rather heard about it. >> >> A producer friend of mine was working on a protools rig with protools >> 6.2!!! >> and logic 6.21 on osx. It worked like a dream he told me. He's working >> on it >> again on Monday and I'm supposedly getting an update on Tuesday. >> >> Keep you all posted. >> >> I have not seen a 6.2 download myself... >> >> Markus - with a smile! >> >> >> >> >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >> >> >> >> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> >> > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

>Or rather heard about it. > >A producer friend of mine was working on a protools rig with protools 6.2!!! That would have to be on one of the new PT Accel systems, because PT 6.2 is only for Accel. It would be a shame if those of us with HD systems would need to upgrade to Accel to make things work correctly. Lee Blaske

Well, its a mix system and he knows I'm on a mix. The guy is a digi power user, gets everything for free... M Den 03-09-27 18.15, skrev "Lee Blaske" <lblaske@...>: >> Or rather heard about it. >> >> A producer friend of mine was working on a protools rig with protools 6.2!!! > > That would have to be on one of the new PT Accel systems, because PT > 6.2 is only for Accel. > > It would be a shame if those of us with HD systems would need to > upgrade to Accel to make things work correctly. > > Lee Blaske > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

Especially when I just bought my HD system 3 months ago! JS On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 09:15 AM, Lee Blaske wrote: > It would be a shame if those of us with HD systems would need to > upgrade to Accel to make things work correctly. > > Lee Blaske > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to > logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

That's encouraging! On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 01:59 PM, audiobuff wrote: > Well, its a mix system and he knows I'm on a mix. > > The guy is a digi power user, gets everything for free... > > M > > > Den 03-09-27 18.15, skrev "Lee Blaske" <lblaske@...>: > >>> Or rather heard about it. >>> >>> A producer friend of mine was working on a protools rig with >>> protools 6.2!!! >> >> That would have to be on one of the new PT Accel systems, because PT >> 6.2 is only for Accel. >> >> It would be a shame if those of us with HD systems would need to >> upgrade to Accel to make things work correctly. >> >> Lee Blaske >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to >> logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. >> >> >> >> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> >> > > > UNSUBSCRIBE: send a blank email to > logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Please email logic-tdm-owner@yahoogroups.com to contact an admin. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >