jump to beginning previous thread #1014 Showing Logic-TDM Digest 1015 of 1031 next thread #1016 jump to end

Forum Index | Read L-TDM: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "David G Burns" <david@bartmart.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 at 10:24:39 AM
Subject: [L-TDM] Re: recording to audio channels 65 or higher.... no go
Message #25351
This is a reply to #25350.
Thanks Mark-looked around and could only find project settings/recording/DAE recording folder,where you can enter a location and "set".Under 7 there was the option of "song folder" versus "global",which seems to be gone now.I think it's a deeper problem than that because I get the tdm setup icon after hitting record on any track above 64 and than the bounce ball,and than Logic crashes and creates a crashed song doc.I'm fearing that PT 7.4 will be the cure,unless anyone else can confirm or deny my glitch.Is anyone out there running LP8 under TDM with 7.3.1 and can record on track 65 or higher.I can't be the only one here.... holding my breath David --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, "ativity2003" <me@...> wrote: > > If L8 allows it, did you REMOVE RECORD PATH before trying to record > above track 64? This is in Audio Config in L7, so don't know where it > can be found in L8...anyway, for me, doing that in L7 always corrected > the problem you describe. > > best > > Mark > > > > > --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, "David G Burns" <david@> wrote: > > > > Been with LP8 for a week or so,can't seem to be able to record to > audio tracks 65 or higher > > under tdm,simply crashes.Tried with virgin LP8 template as well as > older LP7 ones.PT works > > fine.dual G5 1.8,OSX 10.4.10,PT 7.3.1 cs4,TDM HD3 accel. > > > > Other misc annoyances-1-turning touch auto creates a duplicate > track below in the arrange.. > > 2-the mackie control defaults to viewing 16 rather than 8 tracks,as > though it thinks there are > > two controllers,and shows the second one's tracks so there is an > offset between what the > > arrange shows as being on the control surface,and what is actually > displayed on it.Being in > > "single mode" works as expected though...any one else has this..?? > > >
Viewed 837 times, 1 reply, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: tiger <t1g3r@ngi.it>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 12:04:06 PM
Subject: Re: Intel Mac & Logic Direct TDM
Message #25352
This is a reply to #25320.
Hallo i have PT 7.1cs10 with PTHD2 and OSX 10.4.4 can i upgrade to Logic 8 without upgrading PT? what osx version do you use ? already on 10.4.10 ?
Viewed 568 times, 1 reply, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@goodmedia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 12:46:07 PM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Re: Intel Mac & Logic Direct TDM
Message #25353
This is a reply to #25352.
tiger <[ mailto:t1g3r%40ngi.it ]t1g3r@ngi.it> > i have PT 7.1cs10 with PTHD2 and OSX 10.4.4 >can i upgrade to Logic 8 without upgrading PT? Logic 8 requires OSX 10.4.9 or higher. On Intel, you need the future ProTools 7.4 to work with Logic8. On PPC, it'll work ProTools 7.1. But then you'll likely want to upgrade to ProTools 7.3.1cs4 to work with the later OSX. f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>
Viewed 550 times, 2 replies, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Greg Critchley <greg@gregcritchley.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 1:07:01 PM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Re: Intel Mac & Logic Direct TDM
Message #25354
This is a reply to #25353.
F-erenc because you seem to have this together, please answer this. On my G4, Dual 1.25. what version of Logic 8, Pro Tools, and OS should I use so that everything works properly - including ESB, ESX, my Native Instruments, soft synths etc? I have HD 2 with one 192 i/o thanks!!! Greg On Oct 2, 2007, at 10:46 AM, f-erenc szabo wrote: > tiger <[ mailto:t1g3r%40ngi.it ]t1g3r@ngi.it> > > i have PT 7.1cs10 with PTHD2 and OSX 10.4.4 > >can i upgrade to Logic 8 without upgrading PT? > > Logic 8 requires OSX 10.4.9 or higher. > > On Intel, you need the future ProTools 7.4 to > work with Logic8. > > On PPC, it'll work ProTools 7.1. But then > you'll likely want to upgrade to ProTools 7.3.1cs4 > to work with the later OSX. > > f-erenc szabo, smarty pants > Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T > "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" > <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat> > > > > >
Viewed 545 times, 1 reply, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@goodmedia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 5:17:48 PM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Intel Mac & Logic Direct TDM
Message #25355
This is a reply to #25354.
Greg Critchley <greg@gregcritchley.com> wrote: >On my G4, Dual 1.25. what version of Logic 8, Pro Tools, and OS should >I use so that everything works properly - including ESB, ESX, my Native >Instruments, soft synths etc? ProTools 7.3.1 cs4 OSX 10.4.9 or 10.4.10 All TDM plugins need to be upgraded to "ProTools 7" compliant versions. All AudioUnit plugins need to upgraded to ones that pass the AU Validator (ie.. bugfixed). The most recent validator is better (it catches more bugs), which means that some plugins that passed before might not pass now. This doesn't mean the plugin is magically more buggy.. it's the same as it was before. It's just that the validator has now spotted the bug. So in some cases you could ignore the validator's suggestion not to use the plugin and force Logic to use it anyway... and it might still work without obvious incident (not all bugs are serious and cause crashes and death and pestilence and monkey lung). f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>
Viewed 541 times, 0 replies, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: David Bulog <d2ba@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 2:04:07 PM
Subject: [L-TDM] Wanted to Buy Logic Pro 7.0 media disks
Message #25356
This is a reply to #25353.
Hi Im trying to downgrade my Logic Pro 7.2 and are after a set of Version 7.0 disks so i can use OSX 10.3.9 and TDM Mix hardware Any sets for sale thanks Dave
Viewed 556 times, 1 reply, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Eddie Sullivan <esullivan@imsproav.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 5:23:58 PM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Wanted to Buy Logic Pro 7.0 media disks
Message #25357
This is a reply to #25356.
Have you tried Apple? Apple is pretty good about supplying old media kits to registered users, they are usually about $20 or so. On Oct 2, 2007, at 3:04 PM, David Bulog wrote: > Hi Im trying to downgrade my Logic Pro 7.2 and are after a set of > Version 7.0 disks so i can use OSX 10.3.9 and TDM Mix hardware > Any sets for sale > > thanks Dave Eddie IMS ProA/V
Viewed 540 times, 1 reply, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@goodmedia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 7:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Wanted to Buy Logic Pro 7.0 media disks
Message #25358
This is a reply to #25357.
David Bulog <d2ba@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > Hi Im trying to downgrade my Logic Pro 7.2 and are after a set of > Version 7.0 disks so i can use OSX 10.3.9 and TDM Mix hardware > Any sets for sale Seek out Logic Pro 7.1 instead (and then software-update to 7.1.1). Works better. Compatible with MIX and 10.3.9 f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>
Viewed 549 times, 1 reply, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: David Bulog <d2ba@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 at 2:12:47 AM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Wanted to Buy Logic Pro 7.0 media disks
Message #25359
This is a reply to #25358.
Thanks to all who replied Im very pleased that 7.1.1 is supported with PT MIX On 3/10/2007, at 12:24 PM, f-erenc szabo wrote: > David Bulog <d2ba@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > > Hi Im trying to downgrade my Logic Pro 7.2 and are after a set of > > Version 7.0 disks so i can use OSX 10.3.9 and TDM Mix hardware > > Any sets for sale > > Seek out Logic Pro 7.1 instead (and then software-update > to 7.1.1). Works better. Compatible with MIX and 10.3.9
Viewed 550 times, 0 replies, 17 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "Toni" <toni@kv5.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 at 6:27:29 AM
Subject: [L-TDM] Global Edits Logic 8
Message #25360
Upgraded, All cool with TDM etc. Has anyone noticed that Global edits (Insert Time, Cut Time etc.) No longer shifts the automation ? I've checked the documentation but can't seem to find a solution. This is a big problem for me, I had a track with plenty of automation and had to go back to 7 just to add 8 bars. Anyone no if this is a bug or an "improvement" Thanks Pt's HD3 7.3.1cs4, Logic 8, G5 Dual 2.7, OS 10.4.10
Viewed 440 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Jonathan Perl <jon.perl@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 at 7:12:27 AM
Subject: [L-TDM] Re:Global Edits Logic 8
Message #25361
> Has anyone noticed that Global edits (Insert Time, Cut Time etc.) No > longer shifts the automation ? > I've checked the documentation but can't seem to find a solution. > > This is a big problem for me, I had a track with plenty of automation > and had to go back to 7 just to add 8 bars. > > Anyone no if this is a bug or an "improvement" Works here. Check your automation settings "move Automation With Regions" option - it should be set to Always or Ask. ________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Jonathan Perl • Associate Director, Sonic Arts Center at the City College of New York. sonic.arts.ccny.cuny.edu • Apple Certified Trainer for Logic Pro. Apple Authorized Training Center. www.macaudiotrainers.com • Get the ultimate Logic training DVD, Inside Logic Pro 7.1. www.digitalmediatraining.com/products/logicpro7/ • Get the Wired Planet CD: http://cdbaby.com/cd/wiredplanet ______________________________________________________________________
Viewed 485 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "Toni" <toni@kv5.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 at 3:37:28 PM
Subject: [L-TDM] Re:Global Edits Logic 8
Message #25362
This is a reply to #25361.
Thanks for that. I am aware that it works that way but the problem is, if you have automation on say an aux channel with no regions on the track that automation wont move. In logic 7 it worked independently of the automation settings, I would go to the small region menu and select 'insert time and move by locators' and absolutely everything would shift. The other adavantage of course was that you didn't need to adjust the automation settings every time you did a global edit. I guess a workaround is to put long blank regions on any aux channels in the arrange page that have automation on them. --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Jonathan Perl <jon.perl@...> wrote: > > > Has anyone noticed that Global edits (Insert Time, Cut Time etc.) No > > longer shifts the automation ? > > I've checked the documentation but can't seem to find a solution. > > > > This is a big problem for me, I had a track with plenty of automation > > and had to go back to 7 just to add 8 bars. > > > > Anyone no if this is a bug or an "improvement" > > Works here. Check your automation settings "move Automation With > Regions" option - it should be set to Always or Ask. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________ > Jonathan Perl > > • Associate Director, Sonic Arts Center at the City College of New > York. sonic.arts.ccny.cuny.edu > > • Apple Certified Trainer for Logic Pro. Apple Authorized Training > Center. www.macaudiotrainers.com > > • Get the ultimate Logic training DVD, Inside Logic Pro 7.1. > www.digitalmediatraining.com/products/logicpro7/ > > • Get the Wired Planet CD: http://cdbaby.com/cd/wiredplanet > ______________________________________________________________________ >
Viewed 504 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "Toni" <toni@kv5.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 at 5:28:31 PM
Subject: [L-TDM] L8 No Sub Group solo
Message #25363
Another gripe in L8. If I subgroup my drums say to an aux channel I lose all channel strip solo capabilities for both the aux channel and anything bussed to it. I can then only solo from the arrange page which as we know is not instant. Anyone else noticed this ?
Viewed 493 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Peter Duemmler <merlin@merlinsound.de>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 at 5:27:50 AM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] L8 No Sub Group solo
Message #25364
This is a reply to #25363.
Yes. Also the hardwired "prelisten" from the sample editor is silly, especially on the TDM side where there's no universal trackmode. Changed for the bad. :-( Peter --- http://www.merlinsound.de Am 07.10.2007 um 00:28 schrieb Toni: > Another gripe in L8. > If I subgroup my drums say to an aux channel I lose all channel strip > solo capabilities for both the aux channel and anything bussed to it. > I can then only solo from the arrange page which as we know is not > instant. > Anyone else noticed this ?
Viewed 499 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Jonathan Perl <jon.perl@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 at 9:32:26 PM
Subject: [L-TDM] Re:Global Edits Logic 8
Message #25365
> the problem is, if you have > automation on say an aux channel with no regions on the track that > automation wont move. > > In logic 7 it worked independently of the automation settings Sounds like a bug... I'd report via the Logic Feedback form. There's lots of little gotchas (though I've noticed that some problems that happen in older songs opened in L8 don't happen with fresh songs started in L8)...
Viewed 436 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: martin <mbox@online.no>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 at 8:52:46 AM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] L8 No Sub Group solo
Message #25366
This is a reply to #25364.
> Also the hardwired "prelisten" from the sample editor is silly, > especially on the TDM side where there's no universal trackmode. I kind of like the new prelisten setup, the way it uses the environments last two TDM channels and pans them automatically according to if you're editing a mono or stereo recording. If you have the environment open simultaneously you can see how it works. But the downside is that you can't preview through the track where the recording belongs, with fx and all anymore, not that I use that feature much myself in L7. M
Viewed 487 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: martin <mbox@online.no>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 at 9:38:18 AM
Subject: [L-TDM] Recording file name gone in L8
Message #25367
Logic 8 can't set record filename anymore. You have to name every track first. Not good. I mean, if you're going to record a guitarist on an unknown number of tracks for the rest of the day, you just want to set a location and a name, and record away on as many tracks as you want. No need to remember to name every new track, unless you want all your files to be Audio 1, Audio 2, Audio 3... In L7 you have the choice between setting a filename and "use audio object name for filename". That's perfect, so they had to remove it. Was it to advanced for potential ProTools converts ?? ;-) Reported to Feedback, if you feel the same, please report again. M
Viewed 506 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "f-erenc szabo" <zerobeat@goodmedia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 at 10:09:47 AM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Recording file name gone in L8
Message #25368
This is a reply to #25367.
martin <mbox@online.no> wrote: >Logic 8 can't set record filename anymore. You have to name every track >first. Not good. I mean, if you're going to record a guitarist on an unknown >number of tracks for the rest of the day, you just want to set a location >and a name, and record away on as many tracks as you want. No need to >remember to name every new track, unless you want all your files >to be Audio 1, Audio 2, Audio 3... Correct. "Use Audio Object As Filename" used to be an option, but now it's the way it is all the time. Like ProTools and others. If you really want many tracks to bear a similar name ahead of time, just select them all in the environment, then name once, say "Guitar". Then you'll have Guitar 1, Guitar 2, Guitar 3 etc... f-erenc szabo, smarty pants Z+E+R+O+B+E+A+T "NOW POWERED BY THE MIRACLE OF THE TRANSISTOR!" <http://home.goodmedia.com/~zerobeat>
Viewed 504 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: martin <mbox@online.no>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 at 2:51:11 PM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Recording file name gone in L8
Message #25369
This is a reply to #25368.
> From: f-erenc szabo <zerobeat@goodmedia.com> > Correct. "Use Audio Object As Filename" used to be > an option, but now it's the way it is all the time. Like > ProTools and others. > > If you really want many tracks to bear a similar name > ahead of time, just select them all in the environment, > then name once, say "Guitar". Then you'll have Guitar 1, > Guitar 2, Guitar 3 etc... I know, but then my mixer becomes cluttered with strange words, like "GuitBobAcc_day2_dwntuned". I certainly don't want that in my mixer. So I have to rename the tracks back once again. Set and forget is easier. My concern is that they remove a choice that was useful to some, just because ProTools and others don't have it (?) I haven't seen Digi remove a feature from ProTools because Logic didn't have it. They can just switch the way it works in L7 for L8. Object filename as default, with the option to set session filename for those who need it. M
Viewed 511 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: David Frank <rgvd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 at 12:06:12 AM
Subject: [L-TDM] logic 8 + HD3 with G5
Message #25370
This is a reply to #25300.
I have a G5 dual 2.something..logic 8 and protools HD3 work perfectly ,no problems...as long as i have it in auto input. Core audio and tdm audio are still slightly arbitrarily out of sync though On Sep 19, 2007, at 7:25 AM, Mark Henderson wrote: > Any one confirm whether it will work on PPC machines? I had seen > several early posts on Blue Lounge and some other forums saying TDM > systems were working OK with Logic 8 on PPC machines, but PT 7.4 > would be required on Intel machines. I dug through a bunch of posts > last night on the Apple Logic 8 discussion forums and a couple people > said that had not been able to get it running reliably on PPC > machines either. One contacted Apple tech support (for what that's > worth) and was told you absolutely need PT 7.4 installed (hello..... > where is it?) to run Logic 8 on HD systems on all machines. Now I am > confused. > > -mark > >  > Mark Henderson > >  > > mark(at)dirtydogproductions.net > 952.210.4801 > > > > > David Frank @davidfrankmusic.com
Viewed 623 times, 1 reply, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: James Richmond <yahoogroups@jamesrichmond.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 at 8:56:52 AM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] logic 8 + HD3 with G5
Message #25371
This is a reply to #25370.
I have 7.3.x version of protools and Logic 8 running fine on my system (HD3, Dual 2ghz 4gb ram). No problems with coreaudio or indeed anything at all except the usual esb distortion thing from time to time. Jim On Oct 11, 2007, at 1:06 AM, David Frank wrote: > > Any one confirm whether it will work on PPC machines? I had seen > > several early posts on Blue Lounge and some other forums saying TDM > > systems were working OK with Logic 8 on PPC machines, but PT 7.4 > > would be required on Intel machines. I dug through a bunch of posts > > last night on the Apple Logic 8 discussion forums and a couple > people > > said that had not been able to get it running reliably on PPC > > machines either. One contacted Apple tech support (for what that's > > worth) and was told you absolutely need PT 7.4 installed (hello..... > > where is it?) to run Logic 8 on HD systems on all machines. Now I am > > confused.
Viewed 625 times, 1 reply, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Peter Duemmler <merlin@merlinsound.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 at 7:36:16 AM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] logic 8 + HD3 with G5
Message #25372
This is a reply to #25371.
Does the solo function work for you in the TDM environment when you route audio through busses/auxes/I/O (the solo function on the audio object in the environment, not on the tracks in the arrange). Can you still solo auxes (e.g. for only listening to a reverb on an aux)? Peter --- http://www.merlinsound.de Am 11.10.2007 um 15:56 schrieb James Richmond: > I have 7.3.x version of protools and Logic 8 running fine on my > system (HD3, Dual 2ghz 4gb ram). > > No problems with coreaudio or indeed anything at all except the usual > esb distortion thing from time to time. > > Jim > > On Oct 11, 2007, at 1:06 AM, David Frank wrote: > >>> Any one confirm whether it will work on PPC machines? I had seen >>> several early posts on Blue Lounge and some other forums saying TDM >>> systems were working OK with Logic 8 on PPC machines, but PT 7.4 >>> would be required on Intel machines. I dug through a bunch of posts >>> last night on the Apple Logic 8 discussion forums and a couple >> people >>> said that had not been able to get it running reliably on PPC >>> machines either. One contacted Apple tech support (for what that's >>> worth) and was told you absolutely need PT 7.4 installed (hello..... >>> where is it?) to run Logic 8 on HD systems on all machines. Now I am >>> confused.
Viewed 628 times, 1 reply, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "rafmaymusic" <rafmaymusic@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 at 4:39:52 AM
Subject: [L-TDM] Solo Function Not Working logic 8 + HD3 with G5
Message #25373
This is a reply to #25372.
Hi There, Solo on the mixer is NOT working here through buses etc. Raf logic 8, HD3, GSDual2g. 10.4.10 :--- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Peter Duemmler <merlin@...> wrote: > > Does the solo function work for you in the TDM environment when you > route audio through busses/auxes/I/O (the solo function on the audio > object in the environment, not on the tracks in the arrange). Can you > still solo auxes (e.g. for only listening to a reverb on an aux)? > > Peter > --- > http://www.merlinsound.de > > > Am 11.10.2007 um 15:56 schrieb James Richmond: > > > I have 7.3.x version of protools and Logic 8 running fine on my > > system (HD3, Dual 2ghz 4gb ram). > > > > No problems with coreaudio or indeed anything at all except the usual > > esb distortion thing from time to time. > > > > Jim > > > > On Oct 11, 2007, at 1:06 AM, David Frank wrote: > > > >>> Any one confirm whether it will work on PPC machines? I had seen > >>> several early posts on Blue Lounge and some other forums saying TDM > >>> systems were working OK with Logic 8 on PPC machines, but PT 7.4 > >>> would be required on Intel machines. I dug through a bunch of posts > >>> last night on the Apple Logic 8 discussion forums and a couple > >> people > >>> said that had not been able to get it running reliably on PPC > >>> machines either. One contacted Apple tech support (for what that's > >>> worth) and was told you absolutely need PT 7.4 installed (hello..... > >>> where is it?) to run Logic 8 on HD systems on all machines. Now I am > >>> confused. > > > > >
Viewed 588 times, 0 replies, 6 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Magnus Frykberg <mf@bahnhof.se>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 at 10:39:11 AM
Subject: Re: Final Word re. Logic 8/PT compatability?
Message #25374
This is a reply to #25316.
I installed the last Pro Tools 7.4 Beta (my partner is a Beta-tester for Pro Tools) and Logic 8 on my brand new Mac Pro and the DTDM still doesn't work. I KNOW it's a Beta, but the last beta-version was very close to be the final version. (DAE 7.4x287) Will there be another wait for Logic to come out with an update before we can run DTDM? I'm afraid it is....
Viewed 495 times, 1 reply, 24 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Bob DeMaa <bobdemaa@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 at 2:03:07 PM
Subject: Re: [L-TDM] Re: Final Word re. Logic 8/PT compatability?
Message #25375
This is a reply to #25374.
Do yourself a HUGE favor, which I did over a year ago. Abandon DTDM. It was always crippled and buggy anyway. Pick up a cheap I/O with Adat out and pipe the core audio back into your DIGI interface. Or you could wait forever for something that I don't think is ever going to happen. whatever works for you. bd On Oct 22, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Magnus Frykberg wrote: > Message posted by Magnus Frykberg <mf@bahnhof.se>: > > I installed the last Pro Tools 7.4 Beta (my partner is a Beta- > tester for Pro Tools) and Logic 8 on my brand new Mac Pro and the > DTDM still doesn't work. > > I KNOW it's a Beta, but the last beta-version was very close to be > the final version. (DAE 7.4x287) > > Will there be another wait for Logic to come out with an update > before we can run DTDM? > I'm afraid it is.... > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > __ > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > TDM > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > search > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Viewed 603 times, 0 replies, 24 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
jump to beginning previous thread #1014 Showing Logic-TDM Digest 1015 of 1031 next thread #1016 jump to end

Forum Index | Read L-TDM: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.