show first message show previous message Showing Logic-TDM Message 25107 of 25802 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read L-TDM: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "shadowboxnyc" <shadowboxnyc@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 at 4:22:27 PM
Subject: [L-TDM] Re: Logic and Apogee Symphony.....any users?
Message #25107
This is a reply to #25106.
Very true. Good point. In thinking about it. I don't think it is sloppy code. Its just the way the L3 works. It's a look ahead limiter. So perhaps a buffer setting of 32 doesn't give it enough of a look. And it needs more like 512. (But it is amazing how incredibly efficient the Logic Plugs are compared to many Waves or Native Instrument plugs.) --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Bob DeMaa <bobdemaa@...> wrote: > > There's another way to look at this too. Let's say it is sloppy code > or whatever... If you're popping an L3 on something like your mix > bus, hopefully your in mixing mode, and the buffer setting isn't > going to matter. Pick and choose your tools as you go. personally > I'd never consider using an L3 during tracking, or if a mix was in > place turn it off and find a suitable replacement for the overdubs... > > Some folks like to argue about the "hassle" of switching your buffer > around. But if you're mixing it only makes sense to do this. You can > get a lot more cycles in at 1024 than you can at 32. I'ts not a big > deal IMHO. > > best, > > bd > > On May 3, 2007, at 1:39 PM, shadowboxnyc wrote: > > > Thus making you think that Logic or Symphony was the problem > > instead of Waves. There is > > no reason you should have to set your buffer to 512 if you have a > > Symphony card and a Mac > > Pro 3ghz. That's crazy. Unless maybe you are also running a bunch > > of convolution reverbs > > as well. I saw a demo of Symphony on a Mac Pro Quad 2.66 running a > > ton of tracks with a > > ton of plug-ins (including several Absynths, Space Designers, > > Sculptures and Ultrabeats) and > > a buffer setting of 32. That's kind of the point of the Symphony > > system. Obviously any > > native system is going to have its limits, but there's no way one > > plug in should require a > > buffer of 512. Especially a limiter. I like Waves plugs and use > > them all the time but I wonder > > how sloppy that code is when they went from PowerPC to Universal > > format??? > > > > > > --- In logic-tdm@yahoogroups.com, Paul Hartwig <paul@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> I have the Mac pro Intel 3 ghz with symphony, rosetta 800 & Big Ben, > >> its fantastic, but I was told by waves to set the buffer to 512 > >> > >> I was getting jitter with the L3 > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > __ > > Logic TDM Users Group - new forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L- > > TDM > > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-tdm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-TDM/ > > search > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Viewed 776 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read L-TDM: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.