jump to beginning previous thread #271 Showing Logic-OT Digest 272 of 277 next thread #273 jump to end

Forum Index | Read L-OT: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 at 7:56:15 PM
Subject: [L-OT] Does Logic 8 have a new full manual or just an addendum?
Message #6776
I'm on Logic 7. Logic 8 seems to be quite different in many ways to 7. Just wondering if it justified a whole new manual. Unlikely I would assume. An addendum seems much more likely, unless parts of the Logic 7 manual became obsolete or needed updating. Roman.
Viewed 502 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "mt100uk" <miketaylor100@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 at 8:44:25 PM
Subject: [L-OT] Re: Does Logic 8 have a new full manual or just an addendum?
Message #6777
This is a reply to #6776.
--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Roman Pirie <romanp@...> wrote: > > I'm on Logic 7. Logic 8 seems to be quite different in many ways to 7. > Just wondering if it justified a whole new manual. Unlikely I would > assume. An addendum seems much more likely, unless parts of the Logic 7 > manual became obsolete or needed updating. > Roman. > Hi Roman, you get about 5Kg of manuals, and they're all complete, no addendums, certainly better than the old emagic binder.... ;-) Mike
Viewed 501 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 at 9:08:13 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Re: Does Logic 8 have a new full manual or just an addendum?
Message #6778
This is a reply to #6777.
I am on Logic 7. I got full new manuals with the Logic 7 upgrade. If I upgrade from 7 to 8 do I get full new manuals again? Roman. On 29/11/2007, at 3:44 PM, mt100uk wrote: > --- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Roman Pirie <romanp@...> wrote: >> >> I'm on Logic 7. Logic 8 seems to be quite different in many ways to 7. >> Just wondering if it justified a whole new manual. Unlikely I would >> assume. An addendum seems much more likely, unless parts of the Logic >> 7 >> manual became obsolete or needed updating. >> Roman. >> > > Hi Roman, you get about 5Kg of manuals, and they're all complete, no > addendums, certainly > better than the old emagic binder.... ;-) > > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > _ > Logic OT - new web forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L-OT > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-OT/search > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-ot-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Viewed 518 times, 1 reply, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "mt100uk" <miketaylor100@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 at 9:30:41 PM
Subject: [L-OT] Re: Does Logic 8 have a new full manual or just an addendum?
Message #6779
This is a reply to #6778.
--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Roman Pirie <romanp@...> wrote: > > I am on Logic 7. I got full new manuals with the Logic 7 upgrade. If I > upgrade from 7 to 8 do I get full new manuals again? > Roman. Yep!
Viewed 504 times, 0 replies, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 at 1:39:35 AM
Subject: [L-OT] Hey yall, can a graphics person add some vertical lines to this musical staff pdf
Message #6780
Here's the link to the music staff pdf file that i am printing to have manuscript paper: http://www.dolmetsch.com/blankmanuscript12.pdf I am currently drawing lines on this manuscript to evenly divide each line into 4 bars. I don't have any graphics software just heaps of music software. If one of you is capable of adding some thin black vertical lines to evenly divide each line into 4 bars it would save me drawing them manually and I can just print it. Thanks, Roman.
Viewed 508 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Bill Canty <kingkey@optusnet.com.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 at 8:04:05 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Hey yall, can a graphics person add some vertical lines
Message #6781
This is a reply to #6780.
Roman Pirie wrote: > Here's the link to the music staff pdf file that i am printing to have > manuscript paper: > http://www.dolmetsch.com/blankmanuscript12.pdf > I am currently drawing lines on this manuscript to evenly divide each > line into 4 bars. I don't have any graphics software just heaps of > music software. > If one of you is capable of adding some thin black vertical lines to > evenly divide each line into 4 bars it would save me drawing them > manually and I can just print it. > Thanks, > Roman. It'd be easier do it in Logic. Use a "No clef 5" clef, put a semibreve with an invisible head in each bar, hide the time signature, set the max number of bars in each line to "4"... Ummm, I think that's it...
Viewed 540 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Ted Shuttlesworth <dayufpasta@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 at 10:53:44 AM
Subject: Looking for the humanizer in Ultrabeat
Message #6782
I am a new Logic user and I am creating drum tracks but wondering how to turn up the humanizer function so the grooves don't sound so robotic.
Viewed 673 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "Andrea TONI" <Andrea.Toni@rssd.esa.int>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 at 8:29:27 AM
Subject: [L-OT] -- what mac ? --
Message #6783
hello i am very new to mac world i used for years logic on atari and win but have been thinking to move to mac in order to run the latest logic. first of all .. is it worthed ? Is it a huge improvement over 5.5 ? is there any soundiver editing capability for synths in the new logic ? and also what is a usable HW platform to run the latest logic on ? 2g ram or 4 gb ? mac mini ? imac ? mac pro ? i dont use many vst but i would hate to spend 2000 euros or more and have a non working/slow system tnx in advace for the tips Andrea
Viewed 450 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Drew Down <automate2005@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 at 2:29:42 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] -- what mac ? --
Message #6784
No Sounddiver application is available anymore they stopped that once Apple took over the software. You will have to use 6.5, sound diver is still available on the web and you can use it but it has no integration with Logic any more from what I understand. I used it to manage my patches as well. Andrew R. Szczygiel (404) 693-3112
Viewed 442 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Drew Down <automate2005@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 at 2:27:17 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] -- what mac ? --
Message #6785
hello i am very new to mac world i used for years logic on atari and win but have been thinking to move to mac in order to run the latest logic. first of all .. is it worthed ? Is it a huge improvement over 5.5 ? is there any soundiver editing capability for synths in the new logic ? and also what is a usable HW platform to run the latest logic on ? 2g ram or 4 gb ? mac mini ? imac ? mac pro ? i dont use many vst but i would hate to spend 2000 euros or more and have a non working/slow system tnx in advace for the tips Andrea Yes, I would suggest going to someones studio who has it so you can see. Also if you are in the NY area you can visit a apple pro dealer and have them demo Logic Studio Like B&H or even a studio with a pro consultant. Apple Store also has tests they can run to show you performance and the integration between the apple computer and apple logic studio. Becareful with apple store people cause they are very similar to guitar center employees most of them seem to know very little in regards to practical applications and usage of the solutions they sell. They know what the reps and managers tell them to say. Apple is even worse because they seem not to employ logic professionals in the stores more pros and reps geared toward iphoto and consumer applications. NO offense to apple employee's but I have never once had anyone at an apple store be of assistance in regards to Logic. Andrew R. Szczygiel (404) 693-3112
Viewed 437 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Andre Favreau <aliasjunkmail@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 at 12:59:44 PM
Subject: Loop Clip
Message #6786
Does anyone know how to loop a file and avoid a clip when it loops back to the beginning? I need to make a 30sec of music that will loop for a website. Thanks
Viewed 406 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: per@boysen.se
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 at 7:48:48 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Loop Clip
Message #6787
This is a reply to #6786.
> Message posted by Andre Favreau <aliasjunkmail@mac.com>: > > Does anyone know how to loop a file and avoid a clip when it loops back to > the beginning? > I need to make a 30sec of music that will loop for a website. > > Thanks Yes, I've done that a lot. Simply make at least three copies of the loop on a track in Logic (or any other DAW). Then smooth the transitions by audio crossfade and finally cut out the a full loop in the middle (loop nr 2 if using 3 in total). Then this loop should loop with no glitches. Export it to you preferred multi media format. Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.ilike.com/artist/Per+Boysen
Viewed 382 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 at 12:50:45 AM
Subject: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6788
The Apogee Ensemble has 8 in and 8 out digital conversion. Are the extra 4 mic pre's actually an extra 4 A/D's. This would make the Ensemble 12 in, 8 out. It seems a little misleading the way the advertising states it's features. Especially seeing how much money Apogee converters cost. Thanks, Roman.
Viewed 387 times, 1 reply, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Brian Mikiten <bmikiten@idworld.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 at 6:43:24 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6789
This is a reply to #6788.
On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Roman Pirie wrote: > The Apogee Ensemble has 8 in and 8 out digital conversion. Are the > extra 4 mic pre's actually an extra 4 A/D's. This would make the > Ensemble 12 in, 8 out. It seems a little misleading the way the > advertising states it's features. Especially seeing how much money > Apogee converters cost. > Thanks, > Roman. Nothing misleading when I read it. The quality is way above most other equipment in that class. Brian
Viewed 393 times, 2 replies, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 at 5:05:27 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6790
This is a reply to #6789.
But you haven't answered my question. Are the extra four pre's A/D converters making the total A/D inputs 12 not just 8? On 21/12/2007, at 1:43 AM, Brian Mikiten wrote: > > > On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Roman Pirie wrote: > >> The Apogee Ensemble has 8 in and 8 out digital conversion. Are the >> extra 4 mic pre's actually an extra 4 A/D's. This would make the >> Ensemble 12 in, 8 out. It seems a little misleading the way the >> advertising states it's features. Especially seeing how much money >> Apogee converters cost. >> Thanks, >> Roman. > > Nothing misleading when I read it. The quality is way above most other > equipment in that class. > > Brian > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > _ > Logic OT - new web forums! http://logic-users.org/forums/L-OT > - Search the entire archive: http://logic-users.org/forums/L-OT/search > - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email logic-ot-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Viewed 380 times, 1 reply, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Brian Mikiten <bmikiten@idworld.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 at 10:16:48 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6791
This is a reply to #6790.
On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Roman Pirie wrote: > But you haven't answered my question. Are the extra four pre's A/D > converters making the total A/D inputs 12 not just 8? > On 21/12/2007, at 1:43 AM, Brian Mikiten wrote: > >> >> >> On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Roman Pirie wrote: >> >>> The Apogee Ensemble has 8 in and 8 out digital conversion. Are the >>> extra 4 mic pre's actually an extra 4 A/D's. This would make the >>> Ensemble 12 in, 8 out. It seems a little misleading the way the >>> advertising states it's features. Especially seeing how much money >>> Apogee converters cost. >>> Thanks, >>> Roman. >> >> Nothing misleading when I read it. The quality is way above most >> other >> equipment in that class. >> >> Brian Yes, there are 4 pre inputs with phantom power. From the site: Ensemble features 36 channels of simultaneous audio, including 8 channels of Apogee’s legendary A/D and D/A conversion, 4 transparent, digitally controlled 75db mic preamps, 8 channels of ADAT I/O, 2 channels of S/PDIF coax and optical I/O, and FireWire connectivity to and from the computer The preamps feed the A/D side or you can go direct through the rear channel inputs. Brian
Viewed 386 times, 1 reply, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 at 1:37:47 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6792
This is a reply to #6791.
On 21/12/2007, at 5:16 PM, Brian Mikiten wrote: > > > On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Roman Pirie wrote: > >> But you haven't answered my question. Are the extra four pre's A/D >> converters making the total A/D inputs 12 not just 8? >> On 21/12/2007, at 1:43 AM, Brian Mikiten wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Roman Pirie wrote: >>> >>>> The Apogee Ensemble has 8 in and 8 out digital conversion. Are the >>>> extra 4 mic pre's actually an extra 4 A/D's. This would make the >>>> Ensemble 12 in, 8 out. It seems a little misleading the way the >>>> advertising states it's features. Especially seeing how much money >>>> Apogee converters cost. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Roman. >>> >>> Nothing misleading when I read it. The quality is way above most >>> other >>> equipment in that class. >>> >>> Brian > > > Yes, there are 4 pre inputs with phantom power. From the site: > > Ensemble features 36 channels of simultaneous audio, including 8 > channels of Apogee’s legendary A/D and D/A conversion, 4 transparent, > digitally controlled 75db mic preamps, 8 channels of ADAT I/O, 2 > channels of S/PDIF coax and optical I/O, and FireWire connectivity to > and from the computer > > The preamps feed the A/D side or you can go direct through the rear > channel inputs. > > Brian > Still slightly ambiguous. So you are saying that the 4 mic pre's are not an additional 4 A/D converters?
Viewed 376 times, 1 reply, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Brian Mikiten <bmikiten@idworld.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 at 6:40:41 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6793
This is a reply to #6792.
On Dec 21, 2007, at 1:37 AM, Roman Pirie wrote: > > On 21/12/2007, at 5:16 PM, Brian Mikiten wrote: > >> >> >> On Dec 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Roman Pirie wrote: >> >>> But you haven't answered my question. Are the extra four pre's A/D >>> converters making the total A/D inputs 12 not just 8? >>> On 21/12/2007, at 1:43 AM, Brian Mikiten wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 20, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Roman Pirie wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Apogee Ensemble has 8 in and 8 out digital conversion. Are the >>>>> extra 4 mic pre's actually an extra 4 A/D's. This would make the >>>>> Ensemble 12 in, 8 out. It seems a little misleading the way the >>>>> advertising states it's features. Especially seeing how much money >>>>> Apogee converters cost. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Roman. >>>> >>>> Nothing misleading when I read it. The quality is way above most >>>> other >>>> equipment in that class. >>>> >>>> Brian >> >> >> Yes, there are 4 pre inputs with phantom power. From the site: >> >> Ensemble features 36 channels of simultaneous audio, including 8 >> channels of Apogee’s legendary A/D and D/A conversion, 4 transparent, >> digitally controlled 75db mic preamps, 8 channels of ADAT I/O, 2 >> channels of S/PDIF coax and optical I/O, and FireWire connectivity to >> and from the computer >> >> The preamps feed the A/D side or you can go direct through the rear >> channel inputs. >> >> Brian >> > Still slightly ambiguous. So you are saying that the 4 mic pre's are > not an additional 4 A/D converters? It has 8 A/D converters. The other channels are digital (ADAT, etc) and so they don't need converters. Brian
Viewed 394 times, 1 reply, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 at 6:51:19 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6794
This is a reply to #6793.
Are the extra 4 mic pre's A/D converters also? Yes or No?
Viewed 372 times, 3 replies, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Roman Pirie <romanp@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 at 9:16:38 PM
Subject: [L-OT] My TR-Rack's instruments aren't categorised, are the Motif ES Rack's?
Message #6795
I have a Korg TR-Rack. It's my only ROMpler sound module. It has four banks of 128 sounds. The instruments are not categorised. I find this annoying because if I want a certain type of sound, say a bass sound, I would like to audition all the basses by changing the program number and going through the basses category. Basically I want a module that has all the instruments categorised next to each other in multi mode, which is the mode I use because I sequence with MIDI. Also, is it possible to save the Motif's set up for a song eg the instruments used and effects parameters edited for a particular song within the Motif or to a flash drive (I notice the Motif has a USB port)? If I used my MPC60II for sequencing instead of my Logic/Mac set up I could save the MOTIF set up without having to do a sysex dump from my computer. To set up my TR-Rack I had to sysex dump from Logic to get the internal effects parameters set up for each song. Roman.
Viewed 331 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Brian Mikiten <bmikiten@idworld.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 at 7:04:45 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6796
This is a reply to #6794.
On Dec 21, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Roman Pirie wrote: > Are the extra 4 mic pre's A/D converters also? > Yes or No? Don't believe so. They are one of 8 inputs on the back panel. Brian
Viewed 374 times, 0 replies, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Brian Mikiten <bmikiten@idworld.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 at 8:04:32 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6797
This is a reply to #6794.
On Dec 21, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Roman Pirie wrote: > Are the extra 4 mic pre's A/D converters also? > Yes or No? > No. The information clearly states 8 independent A/D converters. Brian
Viewed 387 times, 0 replies, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Andy Hardwake <andyhardwake@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 at 6:09:27 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6798
This is a reply to #6794.
On Dec 21, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Roman Pirie wrote: > Are the extra 4 mic pre's A/D converters also? > Yes or No? How can you input a signal from ***any*** analog device without a converter? Best, Andy
Viewed 377 times, 1 reply, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Brian Mikiten <bmikiten@idworld.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 at 8:16:26 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6799
This is a reply to #6798.
On Dec 22, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Andy Hardwake wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Roman Pirie wrote: > >> Are the extra 4 mic pre's A/D converters also? >> Yes or No? > > How can you input a signal from ***any*** analog device without a > converter? > > Best, > > Andy If you look at the back of the unit on the we site (or in person) you'll see that the back of it has 8 inputs, 4 of which can be 1/4 or xlr. All 8 go to A/D converters. The ones with the xlr inputs are the preamp inputs. Not to be rude but this is pretty darn clear on the site and I'm sure everyone is a bit bored with the discussion of non- logic issues. Please feel free to contact me off-line if I can help. Brian
Viewed 381 times, 1 reply, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Andy Hardwake <andyhardwake@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 at 10:57:20 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Are the 4 mic pre's on an Apogee Ensemble extra A/D's?
Message #6800
This is a reply to #6799.
> > On Dec 22, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Andy Hardwake wrote: >> >> How can you input a signal from ***any*** analog device without a >> converter? >> >> On Dec 22, 2007, at 6:16 AM, Brian Mikiten wrote: >> > If you look at the back of the unit on the we site (or in person) > you'll see that the back of it has 8 inputs, 4 of which can be 1/4 or > xlr. All 8 go to A/D converters. The ones with the xlr inputs are the > preamp inputs. I meant the same by asking this retorical question addressing it to the original poster... > Not to be rude but this is pretty darn clear on the > site and I'm sure everyone is a bit bored with the discussion of non- > logic issues. That was a hidden maning of my post... Pretty rude on my part... Sorry... Best, Andy
Viewed 509 times, 0 replies, 13 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
jump to beginning previous thread #271 Showing Logic-OT Digest 272 of 277 next thread #273 jump to end

Forum Index | Read L-OT: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.