jump to beginning previous thread #240 Showing Logic-OT Digest 241 of 277 next thread #242 jump to end

Forum Index | Read L-OT: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: Andris Sice <hasice@...>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 at 12:46:20 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Re: Logic 7 -> ProBand ??
Message #6001
This is a reply to #5995.
waxenpolyester wrote: > The only down side > I can see > to this is loss of the name. It sounds silly but there is so much history in > it. In all honesty, I > wouldn't want to switch from Logic to "ProBand" (what a lame name) I agree that Pro Band is a pretty lame name, but personally, I think Logic is even worse, almost the opposite of "creative". What about Contra Band? OK, I admit it, now I'm being stupid. Seriously though, I think Apple should have run a naming competition on this list. Andris
Viewed 1143 times, 1 reply, 10 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Murray McDowall <murraymc@...>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 at 1:18:38 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Logic/Mac
Message #6002
This is a reply to #6000.
At 09:46 PM 9/23/04 +0000, you wrote: >Thanks, I use 4.81 in my studio and i have 5.1 on my personal >machine. for my purposes, being all midi related, they both do the >job. i haven't seen the newer versions since it became mac and don't >really know anybody else that uses logic in my little part of the >world. >Gary Hi Gary The only real enhancement I can think of which (indirectly) effects the midi sequencing in Logic is the Multi-level undo which (I think) came in before Logic 5. I can't fire up 4.8 any more because I am on PC and they didn't want to assist crackers - LOL. There may be a few minor score improvements but in general the improvements to Logic since 4.8 have been Audio related features in the audio plugins, the Plugin Delay compensation, Freeze (Logic 6) etc in the audio engine. If you are working with outboard midi you have the state of the art sequencer already (nothing - Cubase/Nuendo, Samplitude, Sonar comes close) and you can run it as long as you can find a box which will run a compatible version of Windows. Regards, Murray
Viewed 1075 times, 0 replies, 4 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "gswerner2002" <gswerner2002@...>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 at 5:54:24 AM
Subject: Multiple MIDI Interfaces
Message #6003
Hi, I was wondering if anbody has ever used more than one interface with Logic at one time. My setup is Logic 4.8 for Windows, I have 98SE, an ASUS TUSL MB, 1.2ghz. Intel Processor and 512mg. of ram. I use a Unitor 8 MKII hooked up to the serial port, but am all filled up and still want more instruments. I still have an open serial port available but I'm not sure if this will work efficiently. Any first hand experience? Thanks, Gary
Viewed 1091 times, 2 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: niall munnelly <aleph@...>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 at 7:37:43 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Multiple MIDI Interfaces
Message #6004
This is a reply to #6003.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:54:24AM -0000, gswerner2002 wrote: > > Hi, > I was wondering if anbody has ever used more than one interface with > Logic at one time. My setup is Logic 4.8 for Windows logic 6 for mac os X supports my two interfaces quite nicely. -- yours, niall. .. . . . . . . . . . aleph null. a simple insinuation around silence. http://syncretism.net .. .. gpg public key - http://www.aleph-null.net/niall.gpg .. ..
Viewed 1121 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Andy Hardwake <digitalmechanics@...>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 at 8:06:56 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Multiple MIDI Interfaces
Message #6005
This is a reply to #6003.
On Sep 24, 2004, at 2:54 PM, gswerner2002 wrote: > I still have an open serial port available but I'm not sure if this > will work efficiently. Any first hand experience? A battery of 1 Unitor8 + several AMT8s chained via their own serial ports here. Works perfectly. Best, Andy
Viewed 1089 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: mars@...
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 at 7:08:43 PM
Subject: re: [L-OT] Logic 7 -> ProBand ??
Message #6006
> ** Original Message follows... > From: Andris Sice <hasice@...> > Subject: Re: Re: Logic 7 -> ProBand ?? > > waxenpolyester wrote: > > > The only down side > > I can see > > to this is loss of the name. It sounds silly but there is so much history in > > it. In all honesty, I > > wouldn't want to switch from Logic to "ProBand" (what a lame name) > > I agree that Pro Band is a pretty lame name, but personally, I think Logic > is even worse, almost the opposite of "creative". It's not any worse than "ProTools". Mars
Viewed 1124 times, 1 reply, 8 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "kevqno" <kevqno@...>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 at 1:28:04 PM
Subject: ProBand??
Message #6007
Has anyone heard anything regarding the release of the new instruments/processors that were shown at last year's Winter NAMM show? Apple showed a guitar processor and drum programming interface for Logic. Sounded very exciting. I would have expected their release by now, particularly with only several months to go to the next winter NAMM. Thanks.
Viewed 1100 times, 2 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Andy Hardwake <digitalmechanics@...>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 at 3:27:04 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] ProBand??
Message #6008
This is a reply to #6007.
kevqno wrote: > I would have expected their > release by now, particularly with only several months to go to the > next winter NAMM. They won't tell you anything before the product is ready. I personally don't expect anything before the winter NAMM, and AFAIU they will do their best to release LPro 7 (or whatever it will be called) or at least a functional beta version by then. Pure speculation based on nothing other than intuition :-) . Best, Andy
Viewed 1030 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: james page <jimmymio@...>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 at 3:05:25 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] ProBand??
Message #6009
This is a reply to #6007.
--- kevqno <kevqno@...> wrote: > Has anyone heard anything regarding the release of the new > instruments/processors that were shown at last year's Winter NAMM > show? Apple showed a guitar processor and drum programming interface > for Logic. Sounded very exciting. I would have expected their > release by now, particularly with only several months to go to the > next winter NAMM. > Well welcome to the club! You'll find plenty of rumors but Apple has always excelled at proving rumors wrong. Grab a chair and wait with the rest of us. JP
Viewed 1059 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: james page <jimmymio@...>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 at 3:48:50 PM
Subject: [LUG] East West Steinway B crashes Logic
Message #6010
Ever since I added this GigaSample, Logic crashes every 20-30minutes. (I have virtual memory active in EXS.) Does anyone use this instrument with Logic? What could be causing this? Thanks, JP Logic Pro 6.4.2 G5 Dual 2gig w/10.3.5 1.5 gig rqm
Viewed 1058 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "HKC" <hkc@...>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 at 9:53:14 AM
Subject: Buying PC
Message #6011
I am going to buy a PC which is going to be used for audio mainly. It´s not for myself and it´s got to be cheap, is there anything in particular that I should look out for, chipsets, graphic cards...... As far as I know this whole PC buying business has become much less troublesome over the years but since my next computer will be a Mac I haven´t really followed the "what in and what´s out" on the PC scene for a couple of years. I still use my 5.51 on my 1800 P4 which runs perfectly so speed is not that important as the person who´s going to use this will use it as a demoing tool probably running Cubase I´m afraid. Henrik Krogh henrikkrogh@...
Viewed 990 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "lukas_burton" <lukas_burton@...>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 at 10:23:15 AM
Subject: Writing CD IDs to SDII file
Message #6012
Can anyone suggest anything for the following: I have a dithered 16 bit 44.1k SDII file that runs continuously for an hour and I need to impose CD ID points (about 25 of them) onto the file so that the eventual audio CD has a series of normal CD IDs even though there's no break in the music . I can rebounce the file in Logic if there's a way of writing these IDs to the file in Logic or is there some kind of CD-burning utility that allows you to do this before or as you're burning the audio CD. I'm using Mac OS 9.2 on a G4 with Logic 5.3.1 and I would normally burn an audio CD using Toast Titanium and the Mac's internal CD writer. I see how I could do it with a stand-alone CD Recorder but I presume that would involve writing the IDs manually and I don't have one anyway... Hope someone can help. Thanks, LB
Viewed 1152 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Per Boysen <per@...>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 at 1:13:23 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Writing CD IDs to SDII file
Message #6013
This is a reply to #6012.
On Sep 30, 2004, at 17:23, lukas_burton wrote: > Can anyone suggest anything for the following: I have a dithered 16 > bit 44.1k > SDII file that runs continuously for an hour and I need to impose CD > ID points > (about 25 of them) onto the file so that the eventual audio CD has a > series of > normal CD IDs even though there's no break in the music . I can > rebounce > the file in Logic if there's a way of writing these IDs to the file in > Logic or is > there some kind of CD-burning utility that allows you to do this > before or as > you're burning the audio CD. I'me doing that in JAM (Roxio). Right now it is not the very best time to invest in Jam as a complement to Logic, since Logic 7 will comes with Waveburner for cd-mastering (if you go OS X, that is) All the best Per Boysen --- http://www.boysen.se http://www.looproom.com
Viewed 1158 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "HKC" <hkc@...>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 at 2:39:37 PM
Subject: Synchro errors from D drive
Message #6014
All of a sudden my audio HD is starting to give me problems, everything coming from the D drive is giving "synchronization errors". It started yesterday when the disk too slow message started to pop up every now and then. Then today it developed into this very annoying state. Is this the much dreaded IBM deskstar problem (they seem to just break down) or what else could bewrong? If I move the files to the main drive everything is ok so it´s not a matter of drivers. I´m on windows but so were half of this list 2 years ago so I thought this was a good place to ask. A new drive doesn´t cost much so that´s not really an issue but I don´t want to buy it if something else is causing the errors. PS If I run all audio tracks from the C drive and add one audio instrument where the samples are located on the D drive then the problem occurs when Iplay the instrument, as soon as I stop things are back to normal. Henrik Krogh henrikkrogh@...
Viewed 1103 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Brian Pylant <bappo@...>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 at 9:07:28 PM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Writing CD IDs to SDII file
Message #6015
This is a reply to #6013.
> I'me doing that in JAM (Roxio). Right now it is not the very best time > to invest in Jam as a complement to Logic, since Logic 7 will comes > with Waveburner for cd-mastering (if you go OS X, that is) Not to mention that Jam is so very difficult to work with, it just doesn't offer a robust set of redbook authoring tools as CD Architect or Waveburner. If it's all that's available it will get the job done, but not efficiently nor easily. Brian :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Logic Audio Pro 6.4.2 PowerMac G4 933MHz OS X 10.3.4 1 GB RAM MOTU 828mkII - driver v1.09 - CueMix v1.4
Viewed 1159 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "gswerner2002" <gswerner2002@...>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 at 8:36:36 PM
Subject: Re: Synchro errors from D drive
Message #6016
This is a reply to #6014.
--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, "HKC" <hkc@s...> wrote: > All of a sudden my audio HD is starting to give me problems, everything coming from the D drive is giving "synchronization errors". It started yesterday when the disk too slow message started to pop up every now and then. Then today it developed into this very annoying state. Is this the much dreaded IBM deskstar problem (they seem to just break down) or what else could be wrong? > If I move the files to the main drive everything is ok so it´s not a matter of drivers. I´m on windows but so were half of this list 2 years ago so I thought this was a good place to ask. A new drive doesn´t cost much so that´s not really an issue but I don´t want to buy it if something else is causing the errors. > PS If I run all audio tracks from the C drive and add one audio instrument where the samples are located on the D drive then the problem occurs when I play the instrument, as soon as I stop things are back to normal. > Henrik Krogh Is this the first time you've tried to use audio files from the D drive, or combined with the C drive? Or do you have a different audio driver active that you dont usually use? I get sync errors with certain audio drivers at times
Viewed 1143 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "lukas_burton" <lukas_burton@...>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 at 1:24:08 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Writing CD IDs to SDII file
Message #6017
This is a reply to #6015.
--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Brian Pylant <bappo@b...> wrote: > > I'me doing that in JAM (Roxio). Right now it is not the very best time > > to invest in Jam as a complement to Logic, since Logic 7 will comes > > with Waveburner for cd-mastering (if you go OS X, that is) > > Not to mention that Jam is so very difficult to work with, it just > doesn't offer a robust set of redbook authoring tools as CD Architect > or Waveburner. If it's all that's available it will get the job done, > but not efficiently nor easily. Thanks for the help. I tried to buy a Jam 6 stand-alone download today since it looked like a relatively fun app. but Roxio's crappy online shop screwed up my credit card processing... What about those CD Architect and Waveburner - Are they still around anywhere? LB
Viewed 1767 times, 1 reply, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Per Boysen <per@...>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 at 6:59:52 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Writing CD IDs to SDII file
Message #6018
This is a reply to #6017.
On Oct 1, 2004, at 8:24, lukas_burton wrote: > --- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Brian Pylant <bappo@b...> wrote: >>> I'me doing that in JAM (Roxio). Right now it is not the very best >>> time >>> to invest in Jam as a complement to Logic, since Logic 7 will comes >>> with Waveburner for cd-mastering (if you go OS X, that is) >> >> Not to mention that Jam is so very difficult to work with, it just >> doesn't offer a robust set of redbook authoring tools as CD Architect >> or Waveburner. If it's all that's available it will get the job done, >> but not efficiently nor easily. > > Thanks for the help. I tried to buy a Jam 6 stand-alone download > today since it looked like a relatively fun app. but Roxio's crappy > online shop screwed up my credit card processing... What about those > CD Architect and Waveburner - Are they still around anywhere? LB CD Architect now comes bundled with the latest version of SoundForge. Just remember you need a pc to run it ;-) Sony recently bought Sonic Foundry so I'm not quite sure about the future of SoundForge and CD ARchitect. Waveburner is an old Emagic software and not ported to OS X until now, with the upcoming Loigc 7. Old Waveburner was available for OS 9 and a really good appl. You must be able to find it at music stores! A third alternative is Steinbergs Wavelab. All the best Per Boysen --- http://www.boysen.se http://www.looproom.com
Viewed 1275 times, 0 replies, 5 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "HKC" <hkc@...>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 at 11:56:55 AM
Subject: Lyrics, very OT
Message #6019
I have a son who´s rather fond of Oasis and in their song the Masterplan there is a line that just doesn´t make any sense to us. And sail them home with Acquiesce, On a ship of hope today, What does that mean, why is Acquiesce spelling with a capital a. I know what acquiesce means but in that particular line there must be some other meaning to it. Henrik Krogh henrikkrogh@...
Viewed 1165 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "jack12250" <jackweaver1@...>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 at 10:36:39 PM
Subject: Rubato tempo maps
Message #6020
Hello, I would like to know how to create rubato tempo maps. My plan is to record a guide vocal and guide keyboard track without a click track. Then I need to create a MIDI beat structure based upon this performance so I can build a MIDI orchestration around this guide performance. Any helpful hints would be appreciated. Thanks, Jack Weaver
Viewed 1093 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: james page <jimmymio@...>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 at 1:29:57 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Lyrics, very OT
Message #6021
This is a reply to #6019.
--- HKC <hkc@...> wrote: > > I have a son who´s rather fond of Oasis and in their > song the Masterplan there is a line that just > doesn´t make any sense to us. And sail them home > with Acquiesce, On a ship of hope today, > > What does that mean, why is Acquiesce spelling with > a capital a. I know what acquiesce means but in that > particular line there must be some other meaning to > it. > Wish I had some brilliant interpretation but being a somgwriter, I've come to accept that lyrics don't always lend themselves to literal interpretations. Sometimes they just "sound" beautiful and we have to "acquiesce" to that being good enough. JP
Viewed 1153 times, 1 reply, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "HKC" <hkc@...>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 at 4:28:19 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Lyrics, very OT
Message #6022
This is a reply to #6021.
I got this replay concerning what these lines mean: sail them home with Acquiesce, on a ship of hope today Wish I had some brilliant interpretation but being a > songwriter, I've come to accept that lyrics don't > always lend themselves to literal interpretations. > Sometimes they just "sound" beautiful and we have to > "acquiesce" to that being good enough. JP I still don´t get it, why is Acquiesce spelled with capital A, I thought maybe it was something historic like maybe a ship. I do understand that many lyrics are chosen just because they sound good and I quite like that but this is just so strange because the right word would be acquiescense, it wouldn't make much sense but at least it would mean something. Henrik Krogh henrikkrogh@...
Viewed 1216 times, 0 replies, 3 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Bill Canty <Bill@...>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 at 3:59:35 AM
Subject: Re: [L-OT] Rubato tempo maps
Message #6023
This is a reply to #6020.
jack12250 wrote: > > > Hello, > > I would like to know how to create rubato tempo maps. > > My plan is to record a guide vocal and guide keyboard track without > a click track. Then I need to create a MIDI beat structure based > upon this performance so I can build a MIDI orchestration around > this guide performance. > > Any helpful hints would be appreciated. Check out "Reclock Song"
Viewed 1083 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: Hans Hafner <hanshafner@...>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 7:08:07 AM
Subject: Re: [LUG] OT: typical dB values
Message #6024
At 9:10 Uhr +0100 08.10.2004, christian obermaier wrote: > > I know some here knows the typical dB values of acoustic guitar > >Hehe, i can imagine the conversation: > > "But Mr. Landlord, you know, a typical guitar played in western style >is only 65dBA, which, when permeating through a 22cm brickwall with >wallpaper on but one side, will be reduced to 58dBA weighted." > >"58dBA ? I don't care if it's 100dBA or not, turn that fucking thing OFF >!" As much as I appreciate the joke, but is that a correct value? Seems a bit soft, or did you take into account the style-dB ratio after Dr. Taste? Anyway, if there's someone who knows, or knows of a resource on this, lemme know... Cheers Hans
Viewed 1021 times, 0 replies, 1 message in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
From: "gcyaid53" <gcyaid53@...>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 4:02:59 PM
Subject: Off enough...?
Message #6025
Hi: I am new to this group and guess I can tell you this. Recently purchased an upgrade from Logic Platinum 5 to LogicPro 6 from Sweetwater Sound. Well , due to my actual address (venezuela) I am still waiting for it to come to my hands, wich is not a problem itself, the issue is that two days after I had notification of the arrive of the box to Miami (there, a courrier send it down to me...) i also get an e-mail about the new Por 7, wow!! wonderful. Bad news is that I ´ll have to wait until it arrived in Venezuela for make another "upgrade" to Por 7. It is good enough so I have to do all the bureaucracy again...??? I mean, in order to get that "all new" Por 7 ???? Well, thanks anyway, it had been kind of terapy... P.D. Please forget my english.
Viewed 1088 times, 1 reply, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.
jump to beginning previous thread #240 Showing Logic-OT Digest 241 of 277 next thread #242 jump to end

Forum Index | Read L-OT: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.