Thoughts from the mind of Jeremy Martin, 26-10-2002: >At 09:17 AM 10/26/2002, you wrote: >>--- In logic-ot@y..., Jeremy Martin <martje@n...> wrote: >> > At 08:09 PM 10/25/2002, you wrote: >> >I think it's a shame everyone >> > enjoys arguing so much over here that it has come to this. I >> >wonder if there's a name for a psychological disease in which >> >people are addicted to arguing? >> >>Are you making a value judgment on whether it's good to argue >>or not? I'd like to argue about that, if you don't mind. Your >>argument that arguing is bad, mmmm-k, is a bit weak since it's >>an argument. > >I'm simply making the point that all of our lists are private lists, >"owned" by the admins. We are free to have whoever we want as moderators. >If you don't like what we're doing, or don't think we should be moderators, >feel free to bring it to our attention (we are all very open minded >people), but never forget you can always simply leave if you don't like it >here. I'm sorry Jeremy, but some people here are trying to do exactly that: bring something to your attention, namely the fact that they don't like the prospect of having a "strictly musical" moderated L-OT list. Many of your replies to some valid arguments that have been made are somewhat weak in my opinion, and (thus?) spark even more reactions, etc, etc, ad nauseam. And then you go about saying that people who like arguing have some sort of psychological disease. I don't think I quite like that to be honest. And then I'm even ignoring the fact that you seem to be as keen on an argument as the next guy... -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra <h@...> Omega Art: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.html