show first message show previous message Showing Logic-OT Message 3224 of 6923 show next message show last message

Forum Index | Read L-OT: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!

From: "yoonchinet" <yoonchinet@...>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 at 5:15:34 AM
Subject: Re: New VST Instruments
Message #3224
This is a reply to #3221.
--- In logic-ot@y..., "Martin, Jeremy" <MartJe@n...> wrote: > *Hopefully* there are people developing such beasts secretly right now. > Maybe at that German music convention soon where Emagic will hopefully > announce the 5.0.1-or-whatever features some new 90'ish digital VSTi synth > will be unleashed by someone. I hope there is someone out there making a Wavestation in VSTi format. It would be cool to have a vector synth out there with not only samples but also with FM and additive synth. I would be willing to pay for that. If anyone has a Wavestation for sale, mail me. I really loved that sound, but never got the opportunity to buy one. > About selling custom built instruments... IMO it's just like the Swiftkick > stuff Len sells. Many great environment objects and Reaktor ensembles are > available for free yet for very high quality stuff (the whole Swiftkick > collection, or professional-quality synths like some of the ones Dash has > created) cost a bit extra... $100's would be too much for anything short of > *SPECTACULAR* but a small US$10-$25 fee seems reasonable to me for hours and > hours and hours of virtual construction work and ideally good documentation. > For the Creamware Scope and Pulsar range there are synths out there for less than $100. And some of these are even by John Bowen (www.zargmusic.com), a co-designer of some well known Korg synths, like the Wavestation. These synths are like the real hardware thing, all run on DSPs. What I'm wondering is, that you can not implement a certain technique in these VSTi, just like that. Some of the synths methods are still patented. FM's patent expired about some years ago, and so NI could implement a FM synths, so did Creamware( but not as well, I'm afraid, :-(). Additive synth has still patent going, if I'm not mistaken, but what about vectorsynthesis? Creamware developed a vectorsynth, but maybe they co-developed it with John Bowen, who may have licenced the rights to Creamware. I don't know. What about phase modulation? The technique that Casio used for it's early CZ series? These are incredible times. I couldn't imagine owning such an amount of synths for such a low fraction of the price of the hardware equivalent. Yoonchi.
Viewed 1384 times, 0 replies, 2 messages in thread. Reply to this message. Read this thread.

Forum Index | Read L-OT: Policy/Rules Messages Threads Digests | Post New Message | Search!


© 1994-2008, All Rights Reserved.