----- Original Message ----- From: To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:29 AM Subject: Re: [exs] Re: INTAKT??? > Matt McKenzie-Smith wrote: > > > > > This rant may well be getting out of hand. Art may have nothing to do > > with this. > Murray McDowall <murraymc@...> replied: > This seems to be the case: since his original "no comment" on the Bitshift > Forum Art posted the following -- > ____________ > > > > > Sorry, that 'no comment' has caused a lot of trouble off the forum. > > To clear things up, however: We had NOTHING whatsoever to do with Intakt > > (well, I mean, obviously we seem to have influenced them quite a bit, and I'm > > bumming about that NFR I sent to one of their developers (haha Well it was bound to happen. Any new beatslicing/playing vsti is going to look pretty similar to P-Pro as as the choice of features is fairly obvious (waveform slicing display-transpose/tuning-vcf-vca-fx and some mod.). The root cause of this collective mini-rant is the total lack of updates and Art could have avoided this if he wanted. If P-Pro was a polished product, nobody would be complaining. Regards, Hector.